Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6728 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I remember reading a while back either on golf.com or golftipsmag.com a lesson (can't remember under what category) discussing divots, their starting point and their relation to where you address/tee up the ball. I was hoping to work on the start point of my divot recently (my divot usually starts a bit behind the ball - of course there are shots where I do not take a divot at all) but cannot find the same lesson I was looking for.

Does anyone remember seeing this lesson? Also does anyone have good pointers on taking an ideal divot (starting AT the ball and not behind). I envy Tiger's ability to rip up the field, but even smaller "LPGA" divots will keep me happy.

 

 

 

 


Posted
Just try to hit the ball first with a downward blow. The divot will be in the right place - whether it's shallow or deep.

Driver: Superquad 9.5° - XS
3 Wood: Big Bertha II 15° - S
Irons: Mizuno MX-20
Wedges: Mizuno 50-06, 56-11, 60-05
Putter: Hog Mallet


Posted
Trying to make a perfect divot probably isn't going to help you hit the ball well. The right mechanics will produce a good divot. The first step is to have some foward shaft lean because without that, you won't be taking any divot.

Posted
There was a lesson online about divots and their position. I just figured tha since I do take a divot on some shots, I could use this lesson to work my mechanics towards pushing my divot forward and getting cleaner contact.

 

 

 

 


Posted
I take a ball and place it outside my swing path the same place in my stance as the ball I'm striking, this way you can see how fat you hit after your swing and not have to guess.

What's In The Bag
Driver: TM Burner stiff
3i Cleveland Hibore Hybrid
3-6: MX-23
7-PW: MP-60 Project X 5.5SW: Golden Bear hybridLW/GW Cleveland 60* and Tour Edge 50*Putter: two bar rifle malletBall: NXT TourHome Course: Raintree CC 70.7/126 North 71/130 Southhttp://stink.net


Posted
i made a threaad about this a while ago but just make a good swing and really fully extend your arms. a few weeks a go i couldnt make a divot with a sand wedge and now im destroying the turf. divots should be about and inch infront of the ball.
What's In My Custom Bagboy Fleicshmans Bag:
Driver: Hibore with Aldila NV 65
Irons: CG2 Irons 3-PW
Wedges: 56 degree Reg.588 Tour Action Chrome Finish, 60 degree Vokey Design, vokey design 52*
Putter: milled series #3Hybrid: Rescue Mid 25 degree3 Wood: War HawkGolf Balls: Serious Play ...

Posted
I saw an article in golf magazine, (this month or last) suggesting to put a tee next to the back of the ball. Then hit the shot, the begining of the divot shouldnt start before the tee. Keep adjusting till you get it right. This worked for me.

In the bag:

Burner 10.5
Rescue mid 16, 19, 22, 25
X-16 irons Forged+ Vintage 48, 54, 60 Circa 62 #3 A009125


Posted
I remember reading a while back either on golf.com or golftipsmag.com a lesson (can't remember under what category) discussing divots, their starting point and their relation to where you address/tee up the ball. I was hoping to work on the start point of my divot recently (my divot usually starts a bit behind the ball - of course there are shots where I do not take a divot at all) but cannot find the same lesson I was looking for.

To strike the ball properly, you must have a flat left wrist (for righties at impact) and the low point of your swing needs to be 4" past the ball. Because of that, your divot should begin AFTER the ball, with the low point 4" past the ball.

Driver- Geek Dot Com This! 12 degree Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 Stiff
Adams Tour Issue 4350 Dual Can Matrix Ozik Xcon 5

Hybrids- Srixon 18 deg
Srixon 21 deg Irons- Tourstage Z101 3-PW w/Nippon NS Pro 950 GH - Stiff Srixon i701 4-PW w/ Nippon NS Pro 950 GH-Stiff MacGregor...


Posted
This is probably really poor mechanics, but I hardly ever have a follow through when taking a divot. When I find myself 135 and in I find myself concentrating on striking down on the ball. This produces a nice high shot that stops and backs up everytime, and takes the perfect divots. My finish usually does not come up past my hip on my left side. The mechanics are likely off, but it has produced great results that leaves me with a two putt and the most.

EGS

910 D3 9.5* Aldila RIP S 70 g
Burner 3 wood 15 * S
Bruner Hybrid 19* S MP-60 S300 4-PW CG 14 52*/10* TP Z 56*/12* TP Z 60*/6* Studio Select Laguna 1.5


Posted
This is probably really poor mechanics, but I hardly ever have a follow through when taking a divot. When I find myself 135 and in I find myself concentrating on striking down on the ball. This produces a nice high shot that stops and backs up everytime, and takes the perfect divots. My finish usually does not come up past my hip on my left side. The mechanics are likely off, but it has produced great results that leaves me with a two putt and the most.

Nothing wrong with that that's a punch shot.

Driver- Geek Dot Com This! 12 degree Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 Stiff
Adams Tour Issue 4350 Dual Can Matrix Ozik Xcon 5

Hybrids- Srixon 18 deg
Srixon 21 deg Irons- Tourstage Z101 3-PW w/Nippon NS Pro 950 GH - Stiff Srixon i701 4-PW w/ Nippon NS Pro 950 GH-Stiff MacGregor...


Posted
I suppose that is it. For some reason I always had it in my head that a punch was a low flying ball resulting from a half swing further up in your stance, but I guess it has more to do with the follow through than anything. But like I said, it works!

EGS

910 D3 9.5* Aldila RIP S 70 g
Burner 3 wood 15 * S
Bruner Hybrid 19* S MP-60 S300 4-PW CG 14 52*/10* TP Z 56*/12* TP Z 60*/6* Studio Select Laguna 1.5


Posted
yea i always considered a punch shot to be a low shot thats used to get under/through trees, etc. id probably consider a really high shot with alot of spin from 130 in to be more of a pitch or flop shot. just my thoughts though.

as far as divots go i personally never take one. not for any shot but ive never had a big problem with GIR and if im not really having a problem i dont see any reason to change to divots.

Driver: Taylor Made Burner 9.5*
Woods: Callaway X 3 Wood 15*
Hybrids: Callaway X 2 Hybrid 18*
Irons: Callaway X Forged (3-9)
Wedges: Callaway X Tour 54*Wedges: Callaway Forged+ (52*, 56*)Putter: Heavy PutterBall: Callaway HX Tour


Posted
Thanks for the replies. At the range yesterday instead of worrying about my divot I worried about fine tuning the other parts of my swing (grip, shoulder tilt, spine angle etc) and it seemed that automatically set me up for a nice divot.

 

 

 

 


Posted
In Bobby Clampett's book he maintains that the deepest point of your divot needs to be 4 inches in front of the ball. He points to a study (sorry, don't have the book with me)which showed how player handicap was related to divots. Went something like: Pro 4 inches in front, scratch 2inches, single digits at the ball, double digits before the ball. Don't hold me to these, but you get the idea.

Ben

Posted
In Bobby Clampett's book he maintains that the deepest point of your divot needs to be 4 inches in front of the ball. He points to a study (sorry, don't have the book with me)which showed how player handicap was related to divots. Went something like: Pro 4 inches in front, scratch 2inches, single digits at the ball, double digits before the ball. Don't hold me to these, but you get the idea.

I don't know if your numbers are exact, but I'll tell you this. You will never see a TOUR player who regularly takes no divot, or takes one even with or in front of the ball.

Driver- Geek Dot Com This! 12 degree Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 Stiff
Adams Tour Issue 4350 Dual Can Matrix Ozik Xcon 5

Hybrids- Srixon 18 deg
Srixon 21 deg Irons- Tourstage Z101 3-PW w/Nippon NS Pro 950 GH - Stiff Srixon i701 4-PW w/ Nippon NS Pro 950 GH-Stiff MacGregor...


Note: This thread is 6728 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.