Jump to content
IGNORED

Anyone play a de-Signatured course


WUTiger
Note: This thread is 3830 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

A standard golf course costs a lot to build, but the Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus and Whoever Signature courses cost even more.

A lot of the Signature courses got built back in the late 1990s as part of a residential development - the idea being the lots will sell faster if next to a Signature course. If the lots sell out, you can take it from semi-private to private.

Well, Signature courses can be troublesome once they get up and running. If the owner has 90% of the lots unsold five years later, and it's basically a public course, the sig emblem can be a money pit.

If you want to change the course - remove bunkers, cut down significant trees, alter water hazards - you have to get permission of the designing guru, or you lose your sig designation. Usually these changes involve negotiations.

We have one sig course in the next county that didn't work out as a club, and got bought with the idea of reworking it into a public course. The famous guru didn't like the changes, so the new owner said fine, pull the sig.

Do any of you play at courses built by famous golfers which have de-Signatured themselves?

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We have one sig course in the next county that didn't work out as a club, and got bought with the idea of reworking it into a public course.

Curious, how does the layout of a signature private course typically differ from a public course (I've never been fortunate to play a signature course) ?       Wondering why it would need to be reworked to become a public course - would it be to intentially void the signature of the course for financial reasons (i.e. cheaper to operate without the associated signature costs) ?

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Curious, how does the layout of a signature private course typically differ from a public course (I've never been fortunate to play a signature course) ?       Wondering why it would need to be reworked to become a public course - would it be to intentially void the signature of the course for financial reasons (i.e. cheaper to operate without the associated signature costs) ?

Nothing specific about the layout that makes it a Signature design.  Both Jack and Arnie have various levels of personal input into the courses their firms design--a "Signature" design is essentially their highest level of personal involvement.  I saw a special on GC:  IIRC, for a Nicklaus Signature design course, Jack personally approves the architectural plans, and makes 4-5 personal visits to the course site as it's being built.  The early visits are to stake in the layout, and the later visits are to site in or tweak specific terrain features like mounds, bunkers, etc.

Since the "Signature" level of design has the most personal involvement of the big-name designer, it's also the most expensive package for the developer.

So, I'm guessing that as long as the course bears the "Jack Nicklaus Signature Design" label, Jack (or his firm) get's to personally approve re-designs, particularly if terrain features are moved or altered.  Sounds like a clever way to hold the developer hostage on future course improvements:  "If you don't pay my firm for the course upgrades, then you can't continue to use my name on your sign."

I'll further guess that "reworking" the course for public play involves filling in hazards and cutting down trees in order to make it more player-friendly (and faster).  It's understandable that Jack/Arnie wouldn't want their "Signature" name on a course that's built for mass/speed play.  They want their personal designs to be challenging and unique.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

ah ok - thanks !    Makes more sense now that I understand what goes into a true signature course...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

... I'll further guess that "reworking" the course for public play involves filling in hazards and cutting down trees in order to make it more player-friendly (and faster).  It's understandable that Jack/Arnie wouldn't want their "Signature" name on a course that's built for mass/speed play.  They want their personal designs to be challenging and unique.

I know of one course in west St. Louis County that went from private-equity to public. It wasn't a signature course, but a local newspaper or magazine interviewed the new manager on the "rework." It included widening the landing area on longer holes (cutting down trees). Also, the rework filled in some sand traps, to open up some tight greens a little more, and to cut down on maintenance.

The rework can also influence course grooming standards. If the main trace of play is mainly fairway lined by a generous swatch of "first-cut" rough, this helps speed up play: You not only can find your ball quicker, but it's easier to hit out of the rough.

I have run into two course superintendents who had re-evaluated their sand traps. If you have a trap that no one ever lands in, you may want to take it out (less maintenance). At Cardinal Creek G.C. on Scott Air Force Base, the superintendent did this about four years ago. The course had several dozen traps.

The course had big-time scrambles on consecutive days. The evening before the first day, the crews went out and raked all the traps. As the second day's scramble wrapped up, the crews went out and looked at the sand traps. Despite nearly 200 golfers coming through the course, a third of the sand traps were untouched. A number of these were filled in during the coming months.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sand traps are one of the biggest drains of a budget. I rake mine 4 times a week. and when it rains everyone washes out. takes 5 guys 8-10 hours to put them back together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm a member of a Palmer signature course, and we might have the most poorly designed bunkers I have ever seen. They have very high,steep faces covered in sand, and every time it rains, they wash out. To make matters worse, the drainage on the green complexes direct the water into the bunkers. When the guys fix the washouts, they put a lot of sand on the faces, and the sand on the bottom is very thin. I used to work at a Donald Ross course, and those bunkers, with grass faces and flat bottoms, were easy to maintain. Our course has filled and grassed a couple of the worst bunkers, but they had to get permission from Palmer's design company in order to continue calling it a Palmer Signature Course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3830 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...