Jump to content
IGNORED

Getting started in Photography


butt3r3dt0ast
Note: This thread is 3749 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I have always had a great appreciation for photography, and could spend countless hours roaming the internet looking at all kinds of photography. I have taken some pretty cool photos on my iPhone over the years, but recently I have decided that I'd like to get into photography more seriously and start taking some awesome pictures.

I am starting this thread because aside from my iPhone, I have no photography gear or real experience. I understand the basics of photography such as aperture, ISO, shutter speed, and depth of field. But I am hoping to hear from some of you about cameras that you currently have or recommend (I'd like to get one soon), tips about starting to take better pictures, how you learned as a photographer, etc...

I enjoyed looking at some of the member pictures in the "share your photos" thread, which hasn't been active for a while. Hopefully, this will spark some life into this forum group!

In the Bag:
:titleist: 913 D3 - 9.5* - Diamana Stiff 62g
:mizuno: MP 64s 3-PW - DGS300
:cleveland: CG12 52* & 56*
:tmade: Rosa

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

@butt3r3dt0ast

http://barzeski.com/dslru/e1001.html - DSLRU Buying Guide

http://barzeski.com/dslru/g1001.html - Introduction to Photography

http://barzeski.com/dslru/g1002.html - Introduction to Composition

These were from a site I ran for a little while called DSLRU. Some of the links won't work (the glossary I didn't bother to recover, for example). If you appreciate the work that went into these and find them useful, you can send a few bucks via PayPal to me at erik@barzeski.com.

If you don't, I apologize. :) They're a few years old, but they should still be pretty relevant.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I first started in photography in the 1970's when I bought a Minolta SRT-201 35mm SLR.  I stayed with it until the early 90's, sort of went into snapshot mode for 20 years, then got the bug again in 2010.  With digital photography I had a lot to learn because there are big differences.  3 years later I"m still learning, and probably will be until I can't get out to shoot any more.

I started trying to be serious about it (as a hobbyist, never a consideration to be a pro) again after deciding to get a DSLR.  What I got at the time was Canon T1i with the 18-55mm zoom kit lens.  Over the next year I replaced the kit lens with an EF 17-40 f4.0 L, then replaced that with what I still have, the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS.  Then I upgraded the body, and along the way I added to my lens collection.  My current kit is:  Canon 60D body; EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS; EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5, EF-S 60mm f2.8 macro; EF 70-200 f4 L IS; EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro.  At least 75% of my shooting is done with the 17-55 lens.

The other consideration for photography, either as a hobby or as a profession, is post processing.  You will probably reach a point where you want to shoot in the RAW format, and that requires that you obtain and learn to use quality post processing software.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@butt3r3dt0ast

http://barzeski.com/dslru/e1001.html - DSLRU Buying Guide

http://barzeski.com/dslru/g1001.html - Introduction to Photography

http://barzeski.com/dslru/g1002.html - Introduction to Composition

These were from a site I ran for a little while called DSLRU. Some of the links won't work (the glossary I didn't bother to recover, for example). If you appreciate the work that went into these and find them useful, you can send a few bucks via PayPal to me at erik@barzeski.com.

If you don't, I apologize. :) They're a few years old, but they should still be pretty relevant.

Thanks for the info Erik. Sounds like you were pretty serious about it back then. Are you still big into photography, now that you're so busy with golf-related work and activities? I don't currently have a paypal, but perhaps I should try to set one up.

PS - I ended up going with the Nikon D3200 w/ the 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 VR kit lens. I think I'm also going to invest in a 55-200mm lens soon too.

I first started in photography in the 1970's when I bought a Minolta SRT-201 35mm SLR.  I stayed with it until the early 90's, sort of went into snapshot mode for 20 years, then got the bug again in 2010.  With digital photography I had a lot to learn because there are big differences.  3 years later I"m still learning, and probably will be until I can't get out to shoot any more.

I started trying to be serious about it (as a hobbyist, never a consideration to be a pro) again after deciding to get a DSLR.  What I got at the time was Canon T1i with the 18-55mm zoom kit lens.  Over the next year I replaced the kit lens with an EF 17-40 f4.0 L, then replaced that with what I still have, the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS.  Then I upgraded the body, and along the way I added to my lens collection.  My current kit is:  Canon 60D body; EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS; EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5, EF-S 60mm f2.8 macro; EF 70-200 f4 L IS; EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro.  At least 75% of my shooting is done with the 17-55 lens.

The other consideration for photography, either as a hobby or as a profession, is post processing.  You will probably reach a point where you want to shoot in the RAW format, and that requires that you obtain and learn to use quality post processing software.

Thanks for sharing FourPutt. I certainly admire your lens collection, especially now that I am aware of how expensive some of these lens can get haha. So far I've just been doing some post-processing in iPhoto. I've read that Aperture is a good mac program to invest in once I get more advanced at processing.

In the Bag:
:titleist: 913 D3 - 9.5* - Diamana Stiff 62g
:mizuno: MP 64s 3-PW - DGS300
:cleveland: CG12 52* & 56*
:tmade: Rosa

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Probably the best program available for photo file management and editing is Adobe Lightroom.  Although there certainly are others, Lightroom not only has some powerful editing tools, but a great file management database, and information and tutorials are widely available.  The big advantage to using an application like LR is that it does non-destructive editing, meaning that the original file is never altered.  LR creates "recipes" detailing all of the steps you take in editing, and applies them for viewing within the program, but only modifies the image when you export a copy.  Your original "negative" is always left as it came out of the camera.

I also use Photoshop Elements when I need to make more extensive changes to an image.  Lightroom will create a copy of an image with the LR edits and send it to Elements, so you still never change the original.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've just been using the stock Canon software (DDP) for editing RAW images. It's pretty good but I've never used anything else to compare it too. My tips... Carry two memory cards, especially if you're shooting raw and/or shooting multiple shots at high shutter speeds (wildlife, sports etc). And invest in something that's NOT your computer to back up shots too, like an external hard drive and make sure to use it! I lost 18 months worth of shots due to a careless data backup and am only left with the crap low resolution shots I posted to Facebook.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...

I own Capture One, DXO Optics Pro, Photoshop CC and Lightroom 5 for Windows platforms.  Which one is best is dependent on your workflow and what you want to do.  For basic RAW processing and image management you can't beat Lightroom.  If you want to process RAW and get the best possible JPEG results then I'd suggest DXO Optics Pro.  If you want to process RAW files and do major enhancements then I'd suggest Adobe RAW with Photoshop CC.

I just upgraded to a Canon 70D and the RAW files it produces are huge so whatever software you use, you definitely want to have plenty of memory and fast drives (I use a 512GB SSD for all editing and store processed images to external USB 3.0 hard drives).

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3749 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I would never do the extended warranty on the $50 slow cooker.  I also routinely reject the extended service plans on those toys we buy for the grand-kids.  I do consider them on higher cost items and will be more likely to get one if the product has a lot of "Electronic Tech" that is often the problem longer-term.  I also consider my intended length of ownership & usage.  If my thought is it would get replaced in 2-3 years then why bother but if I hope to use it for 10 years then more likely to get the extension. I did buy out a lease about a year ago.  Just prior to the lease end date the tablet locked up and would not function.  I got it repaired under the initial warranty and would not have bought it out if they had not been able to fix it since IMO once electronic issues start in a car they can be hard to track down & fix.  They did fix it but when I bought out the lease I paid up for the extended warranty the would cover electronic failures because my intent is to keep that car for another 8-10 years and I just do not trust the electronics to last.  Last week the touch screen went black and was unresponsive.  It reset on the 2nd time I restarted the car but that is exactly how the last malfunction started.  I fully expect to have a claim on that on repair under the extended warranty.  I do not recall the exact cost to fix last time since I did not pay it but I think it was @ $700-$800 and I suspect that will be higher next time.
    • Have you looked at Model Local Rule F-9 Relief from Tree Roots in or Close to Fairway?  You could extend this to cover exposed rocks.  The rule is recommended to be used only for areas relatively near the fairway, a player who hits a shot 20 yards in the woods doesn't really deserve relief.   Players can always take Unplayable Ball relief, they're not required to play it from a rock or a root.  Of course, they hate to take the penalty stroke too.
    • I agree with @klineka, you're clearly doing something right.  Its always going to be a bit of a guessing game if you don't have any scoring history.  On the other hand, understanding that it takes only 54 holes to establish an actual handicap, and they have about 6 weeks in which to play and post enough scores, I don't think its at all unreasonable to require them to have an official handicap before they become eligible for prizes.  I don't know how you structure the fees for the series of competitions, but if its possible they'll play with the group without being eligible for prizes, you could consider a way to let them do that without contributing to the prize pool.
    • I run tournaments and want to put in a local rule that allows relief from tree roots and rocks that are not loose impediments. We have some really terrible lies in some of our courses in my area and nobody is getting paid enough to break clubs. Let me know if you think the verbage for this rule makes sense. Local Rule Roots and Rocks You may move your ball from a tree root or buried rock one club length for free relief no closer to the hole. However you may not use this rule to get relief from a tree, bush, boulder, or other foliage hindering your swing. Your only option here is to play it as it lies or take an unplayable for a one stroke penalty.
    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...