• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
Alohaed

New driver and 3 wood?

Recommended Posts

Alohaed    0
Hey all, I currently play a Ping G10 driver, and K15 3 wood, bothe purchased from TGW. I assume the driver is what(?), 4 - 5 years old? Anyways, would the avg joe golfer like myself really benefit by buying a new driver? I am sure the technology has improved over the past years. Or can I get similar benefits by being fitted for a new shaft, rather than spend the $300 - $400 for a new driver? At age 57, on a good day, I can drive a total distance of 260. And a new driver, whatever the technology, I doubt will give me 30 - 40 more yards. More accuracy, perhaps. But I guess with a decent shaft, maybe for < $100, I can gain maybe 10 - 15 yards and accuracy just the same? Similary with my 3 wood? Which I might just reshaft, since I hit this a mile, very accurate both off the deck and from the tee. Whay say you all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Jakester23    64
One of the biggest changes I noticed going from an Adams redline driver (2000 ish) to a R11 was how much better the off center hits preformed. Im probably going to be upgrading again this year i kinda feel in love with the X Hot last year. The X Hot seemed even more forgiving than my R11. I don't think the distance between a new driver and your ping will be much different but I'd bet you could tell the difference when you slightly miss hit the newer equipment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

saevel25    1,075

Hey all,

I currently play a Ping G10 driver, and K15 3 wood, bothe purchased from TGW. I assume the driver is what(?), 4 - 5 years old? Anyways, would the avg joe golfer like myself really benefit by buying a new driver? I am sure the technology has improved over the past years. Or can I get similar benefits by being fitted for a new shaft, rather than spend the $300 - $400 for a new driver? At age 57, on a good day, I can drive a total distance of 260. And a new driver, whatever the technology, I doubt will give me 30 - 40 more yards. More accuracy, perhaps. But I guess with a decent shaft, maybe for < $100, I can gain maybe 10 - 15 yards and accuracy just the same? Similary with my 3 wood? Which I might just reshaft, since I hit this a mile, very accurate both off the deck and from the tee. Whay say you all?

http://www.golfsmith.com/product/30084519/taylormade-r1-driver

One of the longest drivers in the past 5 years, at $200 dollars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

tooc    2
Alohaed definitely worth getting an adjustable driver, and it is fun getting the setting right, I got an mizuno MP.630 on ebay for 40 pounds, put 10 yards on my drive and much more accurate. Also another advantage is on windy days slide the weights forwards for low trajectory, if the course has all the trouble on a particular side change the bias, I'm after now a 3 wood to do the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WUTiger    454

For both driver and 3W, do a side-by-side with newer models to see which works better. The G10 driver might lose out to some of the newer models.

As for the K15, this low-profile 16* 3W gets the ball up nicely for players with moderate swing speeds. You might find something better, but I wouldn't be surprised if you end up keeping it.

I got solid test hits from the K15 FWs when the model came out, but never did buy any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • The entire purpose of rules are to make things fair... Someone breaching a rule could literally make it unfair. 
    • A meh, but fairly satisfactory 84 considering the break. I had like 9-10 pars or better. got lucky on more than a few scrambles, but a lot of doubles+. My biggest lesson learned after a long break: don't try to go after it.  it cost me a bunch of penalties trying to rope a few out there.  Aviara's beautiful tho, almost disneyland like.  Watching LPGA highlights there on youtube made us all sad about ourselves.
    • So.....you're sayin' it's physically mental......or mentally physical or is it feel vs mechanical or is it a sport or a hobby all I know is I want to golf that ball with my fairway metal while sporting my cargo shorts and rocking my driving hat while hitting a golf shot and being a great driver of the golf ball while someone mumbles 'shot' after a good golf strike of the golf ball and driving the golf cart and drinking the golf bloody mary
    • I don't know if golf is more mental than physical or vice versa.  But I am convinced that a different mental approach/focus can help many problems in the game that many, if not most, instructors view as purely physical/swing related issues.  A correct mental picture/intent can help golfers improve, and combining a mental approach with physical swing training can greatly accelerate improvement.      Take an over the top swing as an example.  With the pure physical approach, the instructor watches the player hit a few balls and dissects the swing into component parts.  The instructor gives a bunch of physical causes:  you take the club too inside or outside, you have too much weight on the front or back foot, you should be supinating your wrist or pronating it, your hips are firing too soon or too late.  The instructor has the player work on a different take away for the first week.  When that gets better, they move onto the next problem and try to fix it.  Two months late, the player is hitting it much better on the range, but still frequently comes over the top on the course.  The more the student focuses on the ball, the more likely a OTT swing will show up.     The other approach:  the instructor watches the student take some practice swings and then hit some balls.  The instructor notices that the student rarely comes over the top for a practice swing but does so on most, but not all swings with a ball.  Okay, she asks, why is the player sometimes coming over the top?  Why is it worse when a ball is present?  The instructor asks what the player is focused on.  The ball of course.  I want to hit the ball, make sure the club head makes good contact.  The instructor then changes the focus of the player from hitting the ball to swinging through the ball to a target.  The instructor explains that OTT is the default when the ball is the target.  She gives some drills to improve focus away from the ball:  the player hits whiffle balls to warm up, the player has to verbally identify the target and intermediary target and rehearse swinging out to the target, the instructor gives the student a mental image of swinging through the ball instead of hitting at the ball.  After a week, the over the top move shows up less often and is not as pronounced.  The instructor continues to have the student work on the mental side of swinging to the target and combines that with swing changes.     In the physical only approach, the physical changes will be harder to adopt because the physical swing is fighting against the students mental image of what is needed and the student's primary focus.  When the mental and physical are aligned, progress will be faster.  Another way to say it:  the mind directs the body. The mind is telling the body to swing one way when the ball is the target and a different way when swinging to the pin.      In any case, an instructor who ignores the student's thoughts is short changing the student by focusing only on the physical.  There's an old saying, if the only tool you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail.  If the instructor only deals with physical swing changes, every problem looks like a physical problem.     On the course, which is more important, the physical or the mental?  I don't know, but it is important that the mental image/goal/focus aids the physical side instead of fighting against it.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (52 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (25 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (39 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon