• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Lihu

Are Golf Simulators biased for Righties? (AKA, Do longer readings on launch monitors make more sales?)

8 posts in this topic

Not that it matters to me at this point, but I found in the past that every time I would go get monitored all my shots go shorter than in real course conditions measured with a Galaxy IIIS cell phone GPS and Bushnell laser.

The optical systems are the ones that give me the worst readings, and the radar units where I need to align things within a few centimeters are the worst ones.

The swing speed monitors read the opposite for me. All the readings are really high.

I was wondering if any other lefties have had anything similar happen to them?

At this point, it's moot for me because I just get a DG S300 shaft or KBS Tour stiff in my irons, and a ridiculous X100/X200 shaft in my woods and Xstiff KBS hybrid Tour steel shafts. I just don't care if I am losing distance by potentially being so grossly misfitted, because the alternative is to have sky hooked balls when I used the results from numerous fittings.

I would like to note that I have never been monitored with a Flightscope or Trakman.

Any opinion or advice is welcome.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I've gotten some weird numbers, but I wasn't sure if that's just because I'm hitting new clubs that I'm not familiar with or aren't fit for me.  I couldn't get good numbers with a Cobra Amp Cell on a simulator but out on the range I hit it really well so I'm not sure if it's me or the Trakman.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've gotten some weird numbers, but I wasn't sure if that's just because I'm hitting new clubs that I'm not familiar with or aren't fit for me.  I couldn't get good numbers with a Cobra Amp Cell on a simulator but out on the range I hit it really well so I'm not sure if it's me or the Trakman.

I am assuming that you were fitted with a Trakman?

How much shorter were you hitting with the simulator versus the live course readings?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am assuming that you were fitted with a Trakman?

How much shorter were you hitting with the simulator versus the live course readings?

It was actually a Foresight system and the carry distances were about 20 yards different and overall about 30 yards shorter.  The system was reporting a slow swing speed too on a large number of swings.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was actually a Foresight system and the carry distances were about 20 yards different and overall about 30 yards shorter.  The system was reporting a slow swing speed too on a large number of swings.

This is the same optical system I used to measure my swing speed.

I assume that the 20 yards shorter is with a driver, which would probably translate to something like 10% to 15%?

That would correspond roughly with what I have seen as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have been working in the simulator industry and currently with bogolf. I agree that most of the systems are developed and tested for right handers and then tweaked a bit to work for the lefties. I am not in any way praising our system but it does perform in the same way for lefties as it does for righties as there are no infrared sensors and instead the motion is being captured using high speed cameras.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the same optical system I used to measure my swing speed.

I assume that the 20 yards shorter is with a driver, which would probably translate to something like 10% to 15%?

That would correspond roughly with what I have seen as well.

Yes it was with a driver.  My on course carry is typically 210 - 220 and the Foresight system had me around 190 - 200 and about 5 - 10 yards less rollout.  I'm 95% certain my on course carry distances are accurate because I use both GPS and laser.

The only other thing I could think it could be is tee height, I usually tee my ball a little lower than the tees on the simulator.  If I was hitting a higher angle of attack I might have lost carry and roll out due to ballooning.

One of my playing partners is a lefty and he has the same issue we're seeing so maybe it is the Foresight system.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have been working in the simulator industry and currently with bogolf. I agree that most of the systems are developed and tested for right handers and then tweaked a bit to work for the lefties. I am not in any way praising our system but it does perform in the same way for lefties as it does for righties as there are no infrared sensors and instead the motion is being captured using high speed cameras.


Interesting system.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • 27/6   Player Unable to Find His Ball Because Another Player Played It Q.A and B hit their tee shots into the same general area. A found a ball and played it. B went forward to look for his ball and could not find it. After a few minutes, B started back to the tee to put another ball into play. On the way, he found A's ball and knew then that A had played his (B's) ball in error. What is the ruling? A.In match play, A lost the hole (Rule 15-3a). In stroke play, A incurred a penalty of two strokes for playing a wrong ball and must then play his own ball (Rule 15-3b). A's ball was not lost even if A and B had been searching for more than five minutes because A had not "begun to search for it (his ball)"; the searching had been for B's ball - see Definition of "Lost Ball." On the other hand, B began to search for his ball as soon as he went forward to look for it. If less than five minutes had elapsed before B found A's ball, B should have placed a ball on the spot from which A had wrongly played his (B's) ball and continued play, without penalty - see last paragraph of Rule 15-3b. However, if five minutes had expired, B's original ball was lost and he was obliged to put another ball into play under penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1).
    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries