Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Can one be a truly good golfer (<3 handicap) if they are also a good tennis player (5.0+)?


Note: This thread is 3520 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yup. I do have to admit golfers and tennis players have an excuse for every thing bad that happens to them. But, I am going lefty next offseason so I can eliminate that excuse.

Posted

I find one of my problems is there is too much time in between shots in golf,

In tennis   , if  think too often between points  I start getting these mechanical thought and play poorly.

same thing happen in golf, so routine is important for me in golf so I can stop thinking too much on technique.

I still think too much in tennis , especially after a missed serve,  I try  S+V  if I miss too many serve as it reduces conscious mechanical tennis thoughts for me.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

I'm  4.5 and 8-9 HCP and feel that the two sports really conflict each other.  I feel tennis allows for more lateral head movement, less wrist use through the shot, and a different swing plane. But to see Sergio and Matt Kuchar play, you have to wonder why their golf isn't affected.  If I had to give up one, I'd unfortunately give up tennis - and where I live, we have some beautiful har-tru courts that would go to waste.


Posted

Maybe that's why they've never won majors :D

The biggest issue for me continues to be a very flat shoulder turn on the downswing with my right hip slinging across to the left. The "feeling of vertical shoulder plane" just does not exist in the tennis forehand. One of my playing partners today brought up that my hips open up so fast and my shoulders are so darn flat sometimes. Continues to be frustrating for sure.


  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

You could have some tennis swing tendencies that bleed into golf, but I'd agree the biggest factor is time devoted to each.

The 'reverse hand' trend makes a bit of sense for the tennis pros you mentioned who for the most part hit right handed forehands in the open body / semi-western swing style where they were essentially hitting off the back foot, while their backhands had a more golf-like turn of the back to the target and hitting into a firm lead foot.

Here's Sampras as an example:

If you decide not to switch sides for golf, you might just emphasize some of the correct feels (trail-lead side weight transfer, full turn, solid base in feet e.g.) in your routine / practice swings to help cue your brain and body.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3520 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.