Jump to content
IGNORED

Personal stories about vaccinating your kids? Opinions?


Crim
Note: This thread is 3656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

My thoughts exactly.  I'm not a doctor, and I trust my kids doctor, so I'm going to defer to their advice over random people on the internet when it comes to my care and the care of my family.

The problem comes when other doctors, even the pediatrician I trust says things like "well, this vaccine isn't all that important compared to the others" Then I read the potential but rare side effects of it and it becomes a numbers game.

Thanks everyone, we're going to start on the vaccines but I still have questions like why does some vaccines only protect against 13 out of the 70 strands of a particular virus?

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The problem comes when other doctors, even the pediatrician I trust says things like "well, this vaccine isn't all that important compared to the others" Then I read the potential but rare side effects of it and it becomes a numbers game.

Thanks everyone, we're going to start on the vaccines but I still have questions like why does some vaccines only protect against 13 out of the 70 strands of a particular virus?

In many cases we're fortunate in the United States to not be exposed to many of the diseases we're inoculated for.  Part of the reason we don't have the problem here is because of inoculations.  My wife and I always considered that the potential side effects were lesser evils compared to the potential of catching smallpox, measles and the rest.  We don't do a lot of travel, but we did / do take cruises and fly on airplanes where the potential to be infected is greater due to the higher number of non US citizens and close quarters.

With regards to the strands, I was told that some strands are so rare that the cost to produce a vaccine is prohibitive with regards to the threat.  Let's also remember pharmaceuticals is a business, and they'd rather develop a better Viagra that they can sell for $20 a pill than a vaccine that will have to be produced at minimal profit for distribution.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

With regards to the strands, I was told that some strands are so rare that the cost to produce a vaccine is prohibitive with regards to the threat.  Let's also remember pharmaceuticals is a business, and they'd rather develop a better Viagra that they can sell for $20 a pill than a vaccine that will have to be produced at minimal profit for distribution.

That's actually what I figured, I figured the 13 strands it protected against were the most common. Thanks for that!

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Don't take this the wrong way--i mean no offense, but I have to say that I think the premise of this thread is problematic.  Its one thing to just be wondering what other people think, but personal stories about vaccinations should not play any role whatsoever in your decision.  Anecdotes by non-doctor strangers shouldn't be a factor in your decision.  That's sort of the problem with this debate in the first place--its a debate between people who know what they are talking about on the one side, and people who don't on the other.

That being said, my kids get every vaccination the doctor recommends.  I pay them for their expert opinions.

I jokingly told my best friend, who is a pediatrician, and my sister who is a pediatric nurse, that I was considering not having my kids vaccinated because of something a former porn star and MTV VJ said about them causing autism.  They were both very upset with me until I came clean.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Don't take this the wrong way--i mean no offense, but I have to say that I think the premise of this thread is problematic.  Its one thing to just be wondering what other people think, but personal stories about vaccinations should not play any role whatsoever in your decision.  Anecdotes by non-doctor strangers shouldn't be a factor in your decision.  That's sort of the problem with this debate in the first place--its a debate between people who know what they are talking about on the one side, and people who don't on the other.   That being said, my kids get every vaccination the doctor recommends.  I pay them for their expert opinions.   I jokingly told my best friend, who is a pediatrician, and my sister who is a pediatric nurse, that I was considering not having my kids vaccinated because of something a former porn star and MTV VJ said about them causing autism.  They were both very upset with me until I came clean.

Theoretically true; however, not all medical professionals agree, hence, the debate. All agree immunizations are necessary but there is some question around which, when, etc. Which is why the gov't shouldn't get involved. Folks should be free to heed the advice of those they trust.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Theoretically true; however, not all medical professionals agree, hence, the debate. All agree immunizations are necessary but there is some question around which, when, etc. Which is why the gov't shouldn't get involved. Folks should be free to heed the advice of those they trust.

I'll be honest--I don't think twice about any of this.  If a doctor tells me, its time for vaccine A, I say thank you and that's about it.  I don't research this stuff, partly because I trust the doctor and partly because I don't have the training or skills to evaluate the issue.  I know that they follow the AAP schedule, and as I suspected, it sounds like AAP put some thought into it:  http://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/Documents/Vaccineschedule.pdf  I'd be suspecious of a doctor who disagreed, not because I favor herd mentality but because I would wonder whether that doctor has the resources of AAP and has conducted as thorough an analysis.

I'm not sure to what extent the government is involved, and I tend to lean libertarian, but vaccinations have significant externalities that probably justify some level of government intervention.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Theoretically true; however, not all medical professionals agree, hence, the debate. All agree immunizations are necessary but there is some question around which, when, etc. Which is why the gov't shouldn't get involved. Folks should be free to heed the advice of those they trust.

You are free to follow whatever vaccination schedule for your child you like. No one is forced to vaccinate anyone. The government only gets involved when you enroll your child into a public school (which you also have the freedom to not do).

Because an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence supports the current immunization schedule, the vast majority of competent physicians recommend following it and public schools require it. It's sad that a fraudulent researcher, a moronic quasi-celebrity, and vague anecdotal evidence can trump the experience and opinion of trained physicians. It's even sadder when children get needlessly sick because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Agree. The next omission needs to be that ridiculous team concept. Nobody cares about a team when they really don’t represent anything except being a group of diminished morality and/or washed up pro golfers. Or wait, we’ve also got total nobodies who’ve accomplished nothing who now get a participation trophy! Doesn’t that sound invigorating!
    • LIV moving to 72 holes is a subtle admission that 54 holes was nothing but a joke all along. 
    • I was going to start a thread, but this seems like the place.  Yesterday I played my matchplay match at my local club.  My opponent is a notorious sandbagger by reputation.  The pro once pulled his tournament rounds from the past several years and said that it is impossible his tournament rounds are legit based on his handicap. here is what happened last night.  I am getting 4 shots from him.  His current handicap index is 15.3 i shot 45 on the front.   Was down 4 after nine, he had three birdies and shot even par. I was closed out on thirteen, we halved with a bogey.  That bogey put him one over par for his round.   He then took a triple on 14 and then left. As if that wasn’t bad enough, he lied about his score.   I wrote down on my scorecard what the score was.  He put higher values that didn’t affect the outcome of the match to pad his score and apparently make it not look as obvious.   He shot 36 on the front, but claimed 40.  The higher values for his score were in the online scoring app our club uses.  He did it this way: I won #7. He had a 2 foot putt for par that if he made would still lose the hole.   He picked up and said it didn’t matter since I won.  He took a 5 instead of a 4 after picking up a gimme. on #8 his approach shot on this par 4 was 8 inches.  I verbally conceded the putt but I had hit into a hazard.  I finished the hole with a 6.  Instead of birdie he put in for par. on #9, another par 4, his approach was to 18 inches.  I missed my par putt and then knowing how close I verbally conceded the putt.  I missed my bogey putt, he never conceded mine.  Instead of birdie he put down a bogey. He padded his score by 4 shots on the front.  And then did again on 10.  I rinsed one and made 6 on a par 4.  I putted out and he was fishing balls out of the lake so I drove off to the next tee.  He had 15 feet laying two but claimed a 5.     love to know the odds of a 15 handicap being even thru 12 holes on a round of golf. 
    • They've been chuckling since they hooked the shark. I think Greg doesn't realize the jokes on him.
    • to confirm, I'll need a hotel for Friday and Saturday, planning to share with you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...