Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Strength and Depth of Field in Jack's Day and Tiger's Day


Strength and Depth of Field  

90 members have voted

  1. 1. Loosely Related Question (consider the thread topic-please dont just repeat the GOAT thread): Which is the more impressive feat?

    • Winning 20 majors in the 60s-80s.
      12
    • Winning 17 majors in the 90s-10s.
      150


Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

@iacas, that guy is an idiot. You can’t fix stupid

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 hours ago, Wally Fairway said:

Erik,
I give you a lot of credit for being willing to fight the good fight; although it is an odd torch to carry.

What's so "odd" about it?

5 hours ago, Wally Fairway said:

I'm also curious if you are out there trying to convert those in the flat earth society?

Recently, some guy on Twitter. Not too hard to find if you look back at my tweets last week. 🙂

That guy looooooooved the Bleacher Report article.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 2/2/2018 at 9:50 AM, Jack Watson said:

@mvmac

Here’s some numbers.  Won’t be posting about field strength again.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1687496-the-myth-of-deeper-pga-tour-fields-during-tiger-woods-era

Wow this is the dumbest article I think I have ever read.  What they are not picking up on is that the best players in the game did not get together but 4 times a year back then (and even then, many Americans didn't go to the Open).  During Tiger's era, it was 8 with the Players & WGC events, and then more with the playoff events.  On top of that, because of the money brought in, best players from all over the world bought houses in the US and played on TOUR on a consistent and regular basis compared to Jack's era.  The article has been written with such a bias it's quite transparent and citing such an article only displays the bias if the individual citing it as well


Posted
7 hours ago, AaronVA83 said:

Wow this is the dumbest article I think I have ever read.  What they are not picking up on is that the best players in the game did not get together but 4 times a year back then (and even then, many Americans didn't go to the Open).  During Tiger's era, it was 8 with the Players & WGC events, and then more with the playoff events.  On top of that, because of the money brought in, best players from all over the world bought houses in the US and played on TOUR on a consistent and regular basis compared to Jack's era.  The article has been written with such a bias it's quite transparent and citing such an article only displays the bias if the individual citing it as well

Until the 90s or so there were virtually no tournaments, major or otherwise, in which substantially all of the world´s best players were entered.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, turtleback said:

Until the 90s or so there were virtually no tournaments, major or otherwise, in which substantially all of the world´s best players were entered.

Look at it this way. Nick Faldo, only has 9 PGA Tour wins. 6 of them are majors. He has 30 European wins. He would come over for what looked like 12-16 events a year, but there are about good number of years he would only come over for 6 or 7 events. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 10/7/2021 at 3:22 PM, turtleback said:

Until the 90s or so there were virtually no tournaments, major or otherwise, in which substantially all of the world´s best players were entered.


I have to laugh at the chumps who show up with arguments that today's golfers by definition are the best ever. Right, except nobody says that. We don't say the golfers are more talented today. We say there are more...

Not sure if this guy "Brock Savage" is a member here- since I'm never on here- nonetheless, I thought this was an extremely insightful comment directly apropos of this ongoing debate/discussion:

"Right, except nobody says that. We don't say the golfers are more talented today. We say there are more talented golfers today. "More" meaning they are more numerous, not more talented.

Talent is random. Only a small percentage of people win the talent lottery --- for world class golf, way less than 1%. And there's no telling whether the most talented player of any period, including this one, was more talented than Jack, or Jones, or Vardon. It's absolutely unknowable.

What is knowable, though, is that the base population is larger, so whatever percentage of people are born with golf talent, there are a lot more of them today than there were 50 years ago.

What is knowable is that training and coaching is vastly improved. Hogan had to dig his swing out of the dirt. Today, they have radar and laser and the Minolta super duper high speed swing cam, and they know exactly how every little swing tweak affects their spin rate and launch angle and apex height -- stuff nobody had any clue about in Jack's day. So 50 years ago, if you had 100 guys born with golf talent take up golf, maybe 30 of them would find their optimal swing. Today, it's probably over 90.

What is knowable is that the huge purses, and the fact that Tiger was the world's richest and most famous athlete, and not just the world #1 golfer, is making golf the first choice of more young athletes, rather than just the guys who couldn't make the "real" sports teams in school. So if you had 100 guys born with multi-sport talent 50 years ago, most of them played golf for fun, if at all. Today, a lot more of them concentrate on golf as their main sport.

And what is knowable is that travel is much faster and cheaper now, so almost every world class player shows up for almost every major and WGC, and for many of the regular PGA events. 50 years ago, the second or third best player in, say, Australia, often didn't even play in the British Open, let alone a PGA event. So all the PGA events, and three of the four majors, had only a handful of international players, and the fourth major had only a handful of Americans.

None of that is speculation. It is a verifiable fact that there are over twice as many people in the world today than there were 50 years ago. It's a verifiable fact that the purses today are hundreds of times as high as they were 50 years ago --- Tony Lema got about $4200 for winning the 1964 Open; today, it's about $1.5 million. It's a verifiable fact that virtually all the world top 100 play every major they are eligible for, instead of only a handful playing any events that require overseas travel.

It's not knowable exactly how all of that combines, but a good indication is the number of entries in the US Open. To enter the US Open requires both top 1% talent for the game, and a serious commitment to it. There were about 2400 entrants per year 50 years ago. This century, it's consistently over 9000, well over three times as many. It's true that, mostly because of the time and expense, the number of duffers recreational players has declined, but they never had any influence on field strength, anyway. High school kids on the golf team still play all they want, for free.

What do you have to counter that? Nothing but your belief that there were half a dozen golf phenoms all at the same time in the 60's, and none today, now that Tiger's past his prime. You're entitled to that opinion, but what facts do you have to back it up? Only the number of majors they won. But how many majors would Phil have won if the fields were like they were 50 years ago?

Phil finished second in the US Open to Goosen in 2004, to Ogilvy in 2006, and to Rose last year. 50 years ago, odds are that none of those guys would have even tried to qualify for the US Open, since it required shutting down their schedule for a minimum of three weeks to travel to the US for sectional qualifying, with no guarantee that they would make it into the actual tournament. Michael Campbell, who beat Tiger with some amazing putting down the stretch in 2005, said that he would not have entered that year if the USGA hadn't established overseas qualifying sites, so he didn't have to travel to enter.

How would Phil look next to Arnie with those three US Opens? Eight majors, and a career Grand Slam.

And how would Tiger look if Michael Campbell, Trevor Immelman, Angel Cabrera, and YA Yang had stayed home, like most international players did in the Jack era?

I'll make it even simpler for you, since you follow women's golf. How much better would the US women look today, if there were no Asians on tour? Or even just no Koreans?

Well, it looks like you're going to crow about the lack of current talent every time a guy backs into a win for the foreseeable future, but come on. The Valero was a 40-point tournament, which makes it one of the weakest regular PGA events, barely above the John Deere. And the tournament committee knows that most top players don't like to play right before a major, so they try to attract the few who do by making it as close to major conditions as possible, to help them fine tune their games. A weak field facing a tough setup is not a recipe for low scores, but you still insist on taking one bad week and comparing it to the majors of your hazy memory, even though you seem to have forgotten epic collapses by the likes of Arnie, who managed to lose a seven shot lead over the last 9 holes of the 1966 US Open. And who knows how often something like that happened in a low-rent event?

I don't know if Tiger was more talented than Jack, or even Trevino. All I know is that there are many solid reasons to believe that in order to win a tournament, he had to beat around three times as many talented golfers, even in most of the regular tour events he's won, as Jack did in a major --- especially the Open, where Jack only had to beat as few as 8 other Americans, at a time when probably 60-70 of the world top 100 were Americans. I don't say it's true by definition, as you claimed, but I say it's the way to bet, based on facts and logic."


  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)
On 9/15/2021 at 2:58 PM, iacas said:

Tiger's Fields >>>>>> Jack's fields.

How many Majors were won 1960-1980 by non Americans? 

Total Count: 

Gary Player (South Africa): 7 wins
Kel Nagle (Australia): 1 win
Bob Charles (New Zealand): 1 win
Peter Thomson (Australia): 1 win
Roberto De Vicenzo (Argentina): 1 win
Tony Jacklin (England): 2 wins
Seve Ballesteros (Spain): 2 wins
David Graham (Australia): 1 win

Total Non-U.S. Major Championships: 16

Between 1960 and 1980, non-U.S. players won 16 major championships.

How about Majors won by non Americans 1997-2017?

Total Count: 

Ernie Els (South Africa): 4 wins
Vijay Singh (Fiji): 3 wins
José María Olazábal (Spain): 1 win
Paul Lawrie (Scotland): 1 win
Retief Goosen (South Africa): 2 wins
Mike Weir (Canada): 1 win
Michael Campbell (New Zealand): 1 win
Geoff Ogilvy (Australia): 1 win
Ángel Cabrera (Argentina): 2 wins
Padraig Harrington (Ireland): 3 wins
Trevor Immelman (South Africa): 1 win
Y. E. Yang (South Korea): 1 win
Graeme McDowell (Northern Ireland): 1 win
Louis Oosthuizen (South Africa): 1 win
Martin Kaymer (Germany): 2 wins
Rory McIlroy (Northern Ireland): 4 wins
Charl Schwartzel (South Africa): 1 win
Darren Clarke (Northern Ireland): 1 win
Adam Scott (Australia): 1 win
Justin Rose (England): 1 win
Jason Day (Australia): 1 win
Danny Willett (England): 1 win
Henrik Stenson (Sweden): 1 win
Sergio García (Spain): 1 win


Total Non-U.S. Major Championships: 33

Between 1997 and 2017, non-U.S. players won 33 major championships.

On 7/12/2020 at 11:18 PM, iacas said:

Brandel has gone so back and forth on this thing himself it's annoying.

 

Edited by csh19792001

  • Administrator
Posted

@csh19792001, we have addressed this about 100 times already.

When 10 good players are playing against a field of part time tour players and club pros, they’re going to win a lot more majors.

When fields are stronger and deeper, with 100 really good players, the majors are spread out.

Jack didn’t face very many good players, including players from outside the U.S. or the UK.

I honestly don’t even know which side your post supports but either way I don’t think counting majors says a whole lot.

  • Thumbs Up 3

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/31/2024 at 3:04 PM, iacas said:

@csh19792001, we have addressed this about 100 times already.

When 10 good players are playing against a field of part time tour players and club pros, they’re going to win a lot more majors.

When fields are stronger and deeper, with 100 really good players, the majors are spread out.

Jack didn’t face very many good players, including players from outside the U.S. or the UK.

I honestly don’t even know which side your post supports but either way I don’t think counting majors says a whole lot.

I support your side, Iacas. 100%. Tiger had a better career than Jack, and was far better at his best. Field strengths are drastically better in the 21st century versus pre 1980's, and LIGHT years ahead of when Hogan played. 

Nobody in this thread listed non American Major Winners during Jack and Tiger's entire primes. I thought people would find that interesting and that it would be revealing, in a comparative sense.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 11/22/2020 at 7:43 PM, iacas said:

I have now had this conversation with another person on another forum.

 

On 11/22/2020 at 7:43 PM, iacas said:

P.S. Here's a full-size link to the conversation: https://p197.p4.n0.cdn.getcloudapp.com/items/eDuwk5RY/conversation.jpg?v=091ffa1f177b2801866b7e32f2f14126. I forgot TST would resize the image to fit within a boundary.

This is one of the greatest posts I've ever seen in my life on sports message boards like this!! Bravo, Sir!! 👏 


  • 9 months later...
Posted
On 4/22/2014 at 5:04 PM, iacas said:

 

And I think the fields were way, way, way stronger in 1997 than in 1967.

 

The difference… I think the numbers back up my opinion. You seem to be guessing.

 

 

It's not pure opinion, no. There's a dash of opinion, but you can break things down statistically, too.

 

And statistically speaking, it's highly, highly unlikely that even the top ten players in any one year in the 1960s or 1970s were, man-to-man, anywhere near as good as the top ten from the 90s or 00s, simply due to the size of the talent pool.

 

The only numbers you can provide to support your opinion - that Trevino and Watson and so on had more majors than Phil and Ernie and others in the Tiger era - also support my argument that the fields are that much stronger today.

I know this post seems out of nowhere, but we had this (very) debate this past weekend (a bunch of hardcore golfers/golf historians): 

Just some food for thought to add to this conversation: 

How many Majors were won 1960-1980 by non Americans? 

How about 1997-2017?

Total Count: 

Gary Player (South Africa): 7 wins
Kel Nagle (Australia): 1 win
Bob Charles (New Zealand): 1 win
Peter Thomson (Australia): 1 win
Roberto De Vicenzo (Argentina): 1 win
Tony Jacklin (England): 2 wins
Seve Ballesteros (Spain): 2 wins
David Graham (Australia): 1 win

Total Non-U.S. Major Championships: 16

Between 1960 and 1980, non-U.S. players won 16 major championships.

Total Count: 

Ernie Els (South Africa): 4 wins
Vijay Singh (Fiji): 3 wins
José María Olazábal (Spain): 1 win
Paul Lawrie (Scotland): 1 win
Retief Goosen (South Africa): 2 wins
Mike Weir (Canada): 1 win
Michael Campbell (New Zealand): 1 win
Geoff Ogilvy (Australia): 1 win
Ángel Cabrera (Argentina): 2 wins
Padraig Harrington (Ireland): 3 wins
Trevor Immelman (South Africa): 1 win
Y. E. Yang (South Korea): 1 win
Graeme McDowell (Northern Ireland): 1 win
Louis Oosthuizen (South Africa): 1 win
Martin Kaymer (Germany): 2 wins
Rory McIlroy (Northern Ireland): 4 wins
Charl Schwartzel (South Africa): 1 win
Darren Clarke (Northern Ireland): 1 win
Adam Scott (Australia): 1 win
Justin Rose (England): 1 win
Jason Day (Australia): 1 win
Danny Willett (England): 1 win
Henrik Stenson (Sweden): 1 win
Sergio García (Spain): 1 win
Total Non-U.S. Major Championships: 33

Between 1997 and 2017, non-U.S. players won 33 major championships.

I just ran the numbers, also, 2018-2025, as a coda to this debate:

32 Majors Played 2018-2025:

NINE Major Championships won by Non Americans.

 


Posted
25 minutes ago, csh19792001 said:

I know this post seems out of nowhere, but we had this (very) debate this past weekend (a bunch of hardcore golfers/golf historians): 

So, 1960 to 1980... 19% and 1997 to 2017... 39%. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/22/2020 at 8:41 PM, iacas said:

Golf didn't scale with the population. It scaled much, much faster. (And I realize you're talking about just the U.S.) Golf went from about 4 million players in 1970 to about 26 or 27 million in 2005.

And, as you know, this ignores the increase in the international game.

Hi Iacas,

Just curious, what're your direct sources for "about 4 million players in 1970 to about 26 or 27 million in 2005".

And where (if you were researching it), would you find reputable/reliable data about the increase in the international game?

On 8/18/2025 at 3:14 PM, saevel25 said:

So, 1960 to 1980... 19% and 1997 to 2017... 39%. 

 

I just ran the numbers, also, 2018-2025:

32 Majors Played:

Nine Major Championships won by Non Americans. 28%. 

 


  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, csh19792001 said:

Hi Iacas,

Just curious, what're your direct sources for "about 4 million players in 1970 to about 26 or 27 million in 2005".

And where (if you were researching it), would you find reputable/reliable data about the increase in the international game?

I don't know. It was from 2020. Knowing myself, and given how I said it, I was citing numbers from a good source. I'm sure you can find it or another with similar info.

2 hours ago, csh19792001 said:

And where (if you were researching it), would you find reputable/reliable data about the increase in the international game?

I didn't cite it, so I don't think I was looking it up at the time. It's pretty widely known.

2 hours ago, csh19792001 said:

32 Majors Played:

Nine Major Championships won by Non Americans. 28%. 

I've never found those kinds of stats to be super relevant. It's a very small sample size, and I already don't trust your numbers because I don't think there were 32 majors played in that time span.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

31 Majors played between 2018-2025. 2020 British Open was not held. 
Masters: Rory, Rahm and Hideki

US Open: Matt Fitzpatrick and Rahm

PGA: no international winners during this span

Open: Francesco Molinari, Shane Lowry, Cameron Smith.

8/31 International winners: 25.8%.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.