Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Attention 15 Handicapers


Note: This thread is 6709 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm curious as to what's the lowest score you've ever carded. I'll get the ball rolling here...

The lowest score I've ever posted to date was a 73 (+6) (Par 67 - 63.8/109). The round consisted of 4 Birdies, 6 Pars, 6 Bogeys, 2 Double Bogeys. I surprised myself, and even my playing partners. Never in my wildest dreams I would have dreamt of shooting a round like that, definitely a great feeling for sure. Of course, I went back the next weekend, shot an 84 (+17) and came back down to earth, haha, the game of golf I tell ya!

Let's hear your stories, cheers!
Driver: Nike 9.5° SasQuatch SUMO²
Fairway Woods: Adams 16° Tight Lies 3 Wood
Hybrids: Adams 19° Idea Pro Hybrid
Irons: Callaway X-18 4-AW (Rifle 6.0 Precision)
Wedges: TaylorMade: 56/12 Degree RAC SatinPutter: Odyssey 34" Tri-Ball SRT PutterBall: Callaway HX HOTHome...

Posted
Used to be a 12 but I've been going in the wrong direction for the past month. I'm probably a 15 now.

Lowest I've had is 82 for 18 holes, 37 for 9. I tend to do a load better on 9 hole rounds.

Let's see...I followed up a 39 with a 48 about three weeks ago, I carded in a pretty big number the other day... my anti-handicap is probably 30. If the putter is working and my drives are staying in play, then I can card 37, 38, 39, easily. If the putter's dead I struggle to break 50 for 9 holes. Usually my driving is good so it really comes down to the putter.
"Shouldn't you be going faster? I mean, you're doing 40 in a 65..."

Driver: Burner TP 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 15*
2I: Eye 23I-PW: 3100 I/HWedges: Vokey Spin-Milled 56*06, MP-R 52*07/60*05Putter: Victoria IIBall: Pro V1xCheck out my new blog: Thousand Yard DriveHome Course: Kenton County...

Posted
Shot 72 twice. Once in a club tournament Didn't win) and once in our after work money match (won good money)...that was 10 years ago when I was a 4...Work, parenthood, blah blah blah, and now I'm happy to shoot below 85...Goal for next year is to be back in single digits. I'm gaining on it.

Posted

Last year I shot a 69 on a par 68 (66.2/92). It was remarkable how easy everything came - fairway, green, two putts, repeat as needed. I bogeyed three holes and birdied two. The two best shots of the day were difficult pitches (one a flop, actually) to save pars.

I haven't come close to having such a consistent day yet, though I do manage to string together 3,4, or sometimes 5 holes of good golf... just not 18 in a row!


Posted
I have shot a 83 on a 72 and 81 on a 70.

I am consistent though. Hardly ever break 88 or so and have never gotten into the 70's.

I always blow up during the round whether it may be on the front or back. I have shot 37's on the back 9 4 times and 6 times on the front 9, but still yet to get into the 70's.

I can't wait for that day if it ever gets here!

In the
AMP Cart Bag
Driver : 3Dx Square Tour 8°
3 Wood : 4DX
2H : Edge CFT TitaniumIrons : M685 3-PWWedges : CG12 Satin 54° and 58°Putter : Odyssey White XG #9 33"Balls : Staff ZIP


Posted
Last year I shot a 69 on a par 68 (66.2/92). It was remarkable how easy everything came - fairway, green, two putts, repeat as needed. I bogeyed three holes and birdied two. The two best shots of the day were difficult pitches (one a flop, actually) to save pars.

That's an amazing story. I'm sorry, hard to believe a 15 handicap could go around in 69...3, 4 or 5 holes of good golf is well short of shooting those kind of numbers


Posted
In my earlier playing days, I carded several 78s on Par 72s (+6), when I was about a 9 hdcp. I've recently returned to golf after playing only about 3 rounds in a decade or so. It's tough not being able to make shots I know I used to could make, but my game's coming back to me. I hope to be shooting consistently in the 80s by this time next year.

Posted
83 on a par 70. 84 on a par 72.

40 was the lowest I've had on 9 holes.

Shot a 41 the other night in my league, and that was from the blues. I normally play whites on most courses. I always have more fun when I can shoot that low.

Putts were dropping, hitting a lot of GIR's, this is how I like to play golf. I'd like to do better, but I'm content to play this way if I could do it more consistently. It seems like when I play this well, I am at least presented with opportunities to make birdies and pars. Just play well enough that I have the opportunity and I'm happy.
"The only thing in my bag that works is the bug spray."

In My Bag:
Big Bertha 454 Titanium (10º)
Big Bertha Fairway Woods Ping G2 HL (Black Dot) Ping M/B (56º & 52º) Mizuno MP-R Series (60º) Odyssey Black Series i #7

  • Administrator
Posted
Very slow here, I was hoping for some good discussion

It's a pretty specific question. I can't answer - I haven't been a 15 for a decade.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Shot a 75 on a par 70 last week. Played a round full of shanks the week before where i shot 114. Then figured it out, played a good 9 holes (front 9) at 2 over 38 on a par 36, the next week. Then played a 4 over (back 9) a day later, followed by a 75 for 18 holes the next day. Had one double bogey and one triple. Crazy ass game. If I keep my head still I'm golden. The second that starts moving, I'm finished. My goal for my first year of golf had been to hit one round at even par. I don't know if I'll get there. Only got until October to do it, but I'm very happy with the 75. Gives you confidence that you can do it. I'm not worried about doing it every time. Just once in a while would be nice.

TaylorMade R11S TP Blur 60 X
TayloreMade R11S TP Blur 70 X

Titleist 910H 21&24
Miura Tournament Blades 5-PW DGX100 Tour Issue
Cleveland CG16 52

Miura Black Wedge 56, 60
Newport 2 Teryllium Ten

Titleist ProV1x


Posted
86 twice and 89 once in the past two months. Maybe a low 80s today..hoping.

In the bag:
905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder S
X 15* Fujikura R
X 19* Fujikura S
4-P MP-14 TT DGS300 53* 588 Gunmetal MP series 56-14 TT wedge MP-R 60-09 Rifle SpinnerDFX Two ball Pro V1


Posted
That's an amazing story. I'm sorry, hard to believe a 15 handicap could go around in 69...3, 4 or 5 holes of good golf is well short of shooting those kind of numbers

How do you think I felt when I had finished the round? I still have the detailed scorecard on my online handicap service: 9 of 14 fairways, 10 GIR, 28 putts (only one 3-putt). I consider it by moment in the sun after having played for more than 13 years and never once having come close to an ace or an eagle.

My second best score was an 81 on a par 72 (69.0/110).

Posted
80 twice on a 71.9/126 course. Best since those was an 82 this year on a 69.4/125 course.

Consistency has always been my killer. I can go anywhere from mid-80's to 3 digits. Normal days are high 80's, off days are 90's and the days to forget have me fighting to keep out of the triple digit range.

Posted
never once having come close to an ace or an eagle.

I know what you're saying. I've gotten exactly

one eagle and nearly one ace. Both were dumb, pure luck. The eagle, my buddy and I were both downhill about 130y away and probably 40-50 feet below the green. I hit a pretty nice shot over the hill, but when we went up for the next shot, my buddy was in the fringe on the far side and my ball was nowhere to be found. Instead of walking back down the hill, my buddy just suggested I drop one off the green, chip on and take a stroke. I do so and he goes to pull the stick for our putts and lo and behold, my ball was in the cup! (so, obviously we declared my other ball an unused provisional! -- We were teenagers walking a hilly course, so strict rules interpretation wasn't exactly in play that day, lol.) Same season, different course I hit a beautiful shot onto a Par 3 that rolled onto a hill on the green and curved like a knuckleball, closed in on the cup and I thought "omigod..." but it lipped out and rolled about 7-8 feet away. And I damn two putted for the only par I've ever hated to card.

Posted
81 on a par 70. I went out in 44 and came back in 37 (+2). I have shot +2 for nine on 4 different nines. These were my best until two weeks ago when I shot a +1 32 on my league.
Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

Posted
Earlier this summer, about two weeks apart, I shot an 82 on my home course, a par 71. The best I had carded on that course were several 86s. Two weeks later, on a links course 40 miles north of here, I shot an 81 in the late afternoon, early evening ( about 102 degrees and very humid ).

Of course, the fact that chaps my chops is that I will go out and shoot a 92 on one day and then shoot a score, such as an 81 or 82, very good for my skill level on another. I am sure the reason for this is that I don't practice enough. And the prospect of me practicing more is not very great due to other, more pressing, obligations. I feel I am on the cusp of playing better golf; in fact, I can almost taste those lower scores that I know are just waiting for me if only...if only...I could just practice a little more.

Final note: Isn't it funny how satisfied we were when we first broke a hundred, then ninety? Now, 81 isn't going to seem quite as sweet to me the next time I card that score. Ah well....I just know a 79 is out there waiting for me to find it!

shortgame85
In the Bag:
Driver: :TaylorMade: RBZ 9.5 Reg Flex
3 Wood :TaylorMade: RBZ Reg Flex
Hybrid: Ping G25 Hybrids 17*, 20*, 23*

Irons:Ping G25 5-Gap Wedge, Sr Flex, Vokey 56.14 Spin Mill NS Pro Reg, Flex

Putter: Bobby Grace Center Shaft 32"


Note: This thread is 6709 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.