Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tigergoat

Phil is bad for golf

100 posts in this topic

All the gambling on the course is no example for our young kids. You cannot be this nonchalant and irresponsible when kids are looking up to you. He needs to seek some help for this gambling problem and the high he gets trying to make money. I really hope these allegations are not true, but let's be honest, we all know it's his nature to take risks like this. I think the guy is bad for the game and is possible felon to boot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I like Phil Michelson.

Just because he gambles doesn't mean he's bad for golf or a bad guy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just done with all his gambling. It sets a real bad example that it's ok to gamble like this on the course. The high stakes he and his cronies play for is not reality for our youth. I just think a better example could be set. If he wants to do it privately then that's his business but we hear about his high stakes games about once a month, along with other gambling on different sports. I do not care for our kids to hear about John Daly or Phil Mickelsons high stakes gambling, and I certainly dont want our youth to believe this is acceptable behavior.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I figured almost all of the pro golfers gambled. If not they sure make up a lot of stories about different bets they made.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is in Mickelsons league. We all know this for on course betting on Tuesdays. His high risk taking may finally catch up with him and make him a felon. My hope is this is all a bunch of nothing, but hanging out with Billy Walters shows exactly how deep Phil is in with gambling and how nonchalant he goes about it. This is not the role model I want for my kids and this is the last straw for me with Phil.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just done with all his gambling. It sets a real bad example that it's ok to gamble like this on the course. The high stakes he and his cronies play for is not reality for our youth. I just think a better example could be set. If he wants to do it privately then that's his business but we hear about his high stakes games about once a month, along with other gambling on different sports. I do not care for our kids to hear about John Daly or Phil Mickelsons high stakes gambling, and I certainly dont want our youth to believe this is acceptable behavior.

Where are you hearing all these stories about Phil's high stake gambling?  Most of the pro's gamble, in the days of Hogan, pro's made most of their income gambling because the prize money wasn't that good.

I hate to break the news to you but gambling is a huge part of golf and all professional sports so if you're concerned about your kids being exposed to it, I'd suggest you toss out your computers and television.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And I'm assuming by your username that Tiger is a better example than Phil for children? Hahahaha.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was acceptable in Hogans day but not now. Are you kidding? Phil is notoriously known to be the biggest gambler on tour and bets on all sports. He even hangs out and plays golf with a huge gambler in Walters who acts as his consultant and bookie, and now possibly trading confidante.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can think of worse role models. Nobody is perfect, and maybe he does have a gambling problem. I'll wait until the investigation is complete and he has his day in court before I pass judgment. As far as betting on the course among friends, what better way to test and develop your ability to handle pressure. I will be making wagers with my son as he gets older, small ones of course, to teach him how to get better under pressure.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And I'm assuming by your username that Tiger is a better example than Phil for children? Hahahaha.

Well, as far as I know Tiger isn't being investigated over insider trading which is a felony. Tiger may have done wrong but I didn't see the FBI talking to him in airports or after rounds.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was acceptable in Hogans day but not now. Are you kidding? Phil is notoriously known to be the biggest gambler on tour and bets on all sports. He even hangs out and plays golf with a huge gambler in Walters who acts as his consultant and bookie, and now possibly trading confidante.

There's nothing wrong with gambling if you can afford it and you have fun doing it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's nothing wrong with gambling if you can afford it and you have fun doing it.

It can and seemingly has become his vice. I just hate to see it advertised to our youth who look up to him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can and seemingly has become his vice. I just hate to see it advertised to our youth who look up to him.

It's not being advertised. I follow sports news closely and this is the first time I've heard anything about Phil being a gambler. Besides, if you become addicted to gambling because a pro golfer likes to gamble, then you're out of your mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Lol ... You create an ID just to come on a golf forum and troll ... Nice ...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It can and seemingly has become his vice. I just hate to see it advertised to our youth who look up to him.

You should criticize Michael Jordan too then, he's a big gambler.  Sounds to me like you have an issue with Phil and this is just an excuse to trash him.  His insider trading investigation has nothing to do with gambling so not sure why you seem to think they are related.

How about Tiger's sexual indiscretions, is that something the youth should look up to?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's not being advertised. I follow sports news closely and this is the first time I've heard anything about Phil being a gambler. Besides, if you become addicted to gambling because a pro golfer likes to gamble, then you're out of your mind.

I think what the op is saying is that he doesn't want his kids to begin gambling as a result of Phil, or any other figure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Lets not forget Pete Rose... ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon