Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4203 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just a quicky on the push fade shot under the new ball flight laws

If I understand correctly, the push fade could be caused by different swing paths into the ball

Clubface in relation to target -  open

Clubface in relation to path   -  open

Path into ball - could be in to out or out to in?

Thanks


Posted

Yeah path can be out to in or in to out related to body.  However, with a push fade, the club face is always open to the path and the face is always right of the body lines are aiming.   You could hit a push fade in that way that starts left of your target and works back to it if your body lines aim far enough to the left.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just a quicky on the push fade shot under the new ball flight laws

If I understand correctly, the push fade could be caused by different swing paths into the ball

Clubface in relation to target -  open

Clubface in relation to path   -  open

Path into ball - could be in to out or out to in?

Thanks

Correct.  Of course the face would need to be open to path to fade, but both of the following scenarios would push fade.

(for a righty)

Scenario #1

Face in relation to target - 5 degrees right

Path in relation to target - 3 degrees right  (in to out) - (face 2 degrees open in relation to face)

Scenario #2

Face in relation to target - 5 degrees right

Path in relation to target - 2 degrees left  (out to in) - (face 7 degrees open in relation to face)

While both scenarios would start the ball in a similar direction, the second scenario would produce more curvature due to the greater differential between path and face.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah path can be out to in or in to out.  However, with a push fade, the club face is always open to the path and the face is always right of the body lines where you are aiming.   You could hit a push fade in that way that starts left of your target and works back to it if your body lines aim far enough to the left.

I'd agree with that. Though I always considered a push and pull relative to the target line, but I think it is better to think of it as the club face relative to the swing path.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

so with a pull draw the same could be said

Club face to target - Closed

Club face in relation to path - Closed

Path into ball - out to in or in to out


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by cipher

Yeah path can be out to in or in to out.  However, with a push fade, the club face is always open to the path and the face is always right of the body lines where you are aiming.   You could hit a push fade in that way that starts left of your target and works back to it if your body lines aim far enough to the left.

I'd agree with that. Though I always considered a push and pull relative to the target line, but I think it is better to think of it as the club face relative to the swing path.

I used to consider it that way as well, but I think Erik mentioned why it would be more accurate to relate it to your alignments.  If I align 15 degrees left, I could still hit a "push fade" to the target.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

so with a pull draw the same could be said

Club face to target - Closed

Club face in relation to path - Closed

Path into ball - out to in or in to out

Absolutely.  When the ball starts left (or right), and curves further in the same direction, the only thing we can be certain of is face angle.

If the ball starts right and curves back left (push draw), we know the face was pointing right to start the ball right, and the swing path had to be further right to make the ball draw back.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'd agree with that. Though I always considered a push and pull relative to the target line, but I think it is better to think of it as the club face relative to the swing path.

Yeah if you limit it to the target line then it limits the number of shots that are possible.   For example you could set up closed and hit a straight shot at the target that could only be a straight shot when in reality it is a straight pull, which is a better description.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Club face to target - Closed

Club face in relation to path - Closed

Path into ball - out to in or in to out

Personally, I hate describing things like that.

Anything relative to the target or your alignment: use the words "left" or "right". Qualifiers can be used too, like "face aimed right of stance, left of target, and path traveling left of the face." That's a push-fade that finishes toward the target.

Clubface relative to path: use "open" or "closed." That's how most people read those words, so limit them to only those situations.

Otherwise you end up telling people that they hit a draw that finishes at the target with the clubface "open to the target," which sounds stupid.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4203 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.