• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mailman

The importance of staying positive (or, not giving up...straight away! :)

3 posts in this topic

On Sunday in our monthly medal competition I teed off on our first tee and imediately hit the ball all of 15 feet which ende up to the left of us on the foot path RIGHT IN FRONT of the club house (thankfully there was only a couple people around watchng!!!!:)! So I reload, fire off my drive which ends up down the left hand side of the fareway making the next shot in to the green very long! I line up my next shot, hit it fat and straight in to water! Take my next and promptly put that in the water too! At this point Im starting to think its not going to be my day! Anyway, I walk off the first green with a solid 10 on my score card! On the next tee I put my drive DEEP in trouble down the right side in to a thickly wooded area where my only optio is the chip the ball out and play my third shot up to the green. BUT by now Im really chuntering, feeling sorry for my partners because Im the one that has already put us well behind the group in front playing military golf BUT I keep reminding myself that this is only the second hole and the game isnt over yet! I put my third shot is about 10 feet from the pin followed by putting the putt in the bottom of the cup for a hard worked par! I then par the next hole, then proceed trying to hold my found together by limiting damage as I come in 3 over par (for my handicap) after the front nine (52 in total). The next 9 holes were completely different though! 4 pars, 2 doble bogeys, and 3 bogeys (which ALL should have been pars thnks to crap putting!) meant I screamed back in 4 under par with a hugely improved 43 on the back 9!!!! Anyway I ended up with a net 70 one under par (95) but apart from the 10 on the first hole I really could have made something of this round as the thing that REALLY killed me was seven 3 putts! Then again, thats the thing...there is always something going wrong. I could be driving like a PGA pro BUT will completely screw up the approach shots or drive like a chump yet race around the round with 28 putts! I tell you, the day I put together two steady 9 holes in the same round Im going to be about average! So the big story really is that while I struggled through the front 9 I kept telling myself to stay calm and stay positive and limit the damage, which for the most part I did. This then allowed me to claw things back to the point where I shot only my second best medal round this year and more importantly ended up getting my handicap cut from 25 to 23.8. Yay me! :) But yes, gold is a cruel CRUEL mistriss at times! Regards Mailman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

There is another thread on here about laughing about other's misfortunes on the golf course. I read your post and had to chuckle a little. I was not smiling about you, or your game. I was smiling about the times I remembered being in your shoes. Keeping one's focus after a bad shot, or a series of bad shots is the mark of a good player regardless of their handicap.

I was in a big time tournament (for me) and on the first tee I topped the ball and sent it into the left rough/bushes. Maybe 50 yards. Boy did I get some rolled eyes, and some not so kind "muttering" from those around me. The starter even asked me if I thought I actually belonged in the tournament. Of course everyone else got off the first tee in decent shape.  (As I left the first tee, I whispered a few choice words to the starter, which made me feel much better.) It was a par 4 and I scored a 7. Long story short, I shot the low round of my group, and finished with a net 65, which was good enough for 3rd place in the tournament.

Bad shots are the same as good shots once they are played. They are history, and the golfer's next shot is what is important. I once read where a MLB umpire was asked what his toughest call was. He replied "My Next One". All golf shots should be treated the same way.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bad shots are the same as good shots once they are played. They are history, and the golfer's next shot is what is important.

QFT.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries