Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can you give me an example of a situation in which a ball is lost, the player drops in the area where it was lost, plays from there with no correction and no adding a stroke and distance penalty (assuming that was even possible), could possibly not result in a DQing serious breach?

Player hit a screamer from the tee. It hits a tree or obstruction some 20 yards in front of him and it ricochets back, 30 yards behind him OOB. He drops the ball and plays from a couple of yards in front of the OOB margin. 3 extra strokes instead of S&D.; This does include the 'stroke' from S&D; plus 2 wrong place penalties.

But you haven't explained the significance of the word 'if'.


Posted

Yes I can.  I've watched a player play a stroke, hit the ball off the toe of the club and only move it 30 feet, mostly to the right, but into deep native rough.  when he didn't find the ball, he dropped and played from outside of the deep grass, but still about 15 feet from the place he played from.  Definitely a wrong place, but just as definitely not a serious breach, as he was only about 5 feet forward from the previous spot.

Player hit a screamer from the tee. It hits a tree or obstruction some 20 yards in front of him and it ricochets back, 30 yards behind him OOB. He drops the ball and plays from a couple of yards in front of the OOB margin. 3 extra strokes instead of S&D.; This does include the 'stroke' from S&D; plus 2 wrong place penalties.

But you haven't explained the significance of the word 'if'.

:surrender:

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I want to expand on this topic a bit.  In researching it some more for my debate in another forum, I realized that nowhere in the rules of golf that I can find does it say that a dropped or placed ball is not in play.

I've got a second part to this question, but to avoid confusing the issue, let's answer this part first.

Is a ball dropped or placed ever not in-play?

Note that 20-4 does not say that a ball incorrectly dropped or placed is not in-play:

Quote:

20-4 . When Ball Dropped Or Placed Is In Play

If the player’s ball in play has been lifted, it is again in play when dropped or placed.

A substituted ball becomes the ball in play when it has been dropped or placed.

(Ball incorrectly substituted – see Rule 15-2 )

(Lifting ball incorrectly substituted, dropped or placed – see Rule 20-6 )

In fact, even if a drop does not conform to 20-2, there is nothing in 20-2 which says the ball is not in play.  20-2c lists when the ball must be re-dropped without penalty, but it does not say the ball is not in-play.

Furthermore, rule 20-6 gives us the authority to correct an error in a drop/place/substitution.  Such a rule is only necessary if the ball is in play.

I suppose the one caveat is a dropped or placed ball is not in-play until it has come to rest.


Posted

The decision says the player  incurs the stroke and distance penalty plus the 2 stroke penalty.  So yes, having hit the ball the player can go back to the previous spot, (i.e., belatedly follow the rule).

But we re talking of the situaton where he does not go bck to the previous spot and rehit.  So if he does not, how does he, or an official consulted later for a ruling, add "stroke and distance" to his score?  The only way that penalty can be incorporated in his score is if he actually goes back and re-hits.  Otherwise what is his score, a 83 plus a stroke and distance?

Can you give me an example of a situation in which a ball is lost, the player drops in the area where it was lost, plays from there with no correction and no adding a stroke and distance penalty (assuming that was even possible), could possibly not result in a DQing serious breach?  IOW it is virtually by definition a serious breach because it puts the player in a position of not having a valid score and no way of adjusting the score to make it valid, since do do so required an action (the stroke and distance penalty) that cannot be retroactively fixed.

How can a player who has made it impossible to have a valid score not be guilty of a serious breach?  And if there was not a serious breach, how do you determine his score for that hole?

In addition to the examples which have brought about your surrender, you seem to have missed my earlier  mention of a player whose ball rebounds off something and ends up behind him (Post #9) :-(


Posted

In addition to the examples which have brought about your surrender, you seem to have missed my earlier  mention of a player whose ball rebounds off something and ends up behind him (Post #9)

What??  You want your own flag?  OK. :surrender:

Better? ;-)

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

1) If the ball was not in play before being placed or dropped.

2) If there is no intention to put it into play. eg 20-2a/8


Posted

1) If the ball was not in play before being placed or dropped.

2) If there is no intention to put it into play. eg 20-2a/8

I'm not sure I understand #1.  Do you mean a case such as my ball is lying in the fairway.  For some unknown reason, I decide to drop another ball without touching the original.  Since the second ball was not in-play and the first ball was never lifted, the second ball does not become the ball in play?  If so, that certainly makes sense.


Posted

Argh…editing time limit expired…let me rescind my "that makes sense" comment:

Continuing with the scenario of a second ball dropped when the original ball is lying in-play…….

Definition of Ball in Play says:

Quote:
A ball is “ in play ” as soon as the player has made a stroke on the teeing ground . It remains in play until it is holed , except when it is lost , out of bounds or lifted, or another ball has been substituted , whether or not the substitution is permitted; a ball so substituted becomes the ball in play .

Definition of substituted ball says:

Quote:

A “ substituted ball ” is a ball put into play for the original ball that was either in play , lost , out of bounds or lifted.

And rule 20-6 says:

Quote:

20-6 . Lifting Ball Incorrectly Substituted, Dropped Or Placed

A ball incorrectly substituted , dropped or placed in a wrong place or otherwise not in accordance with the Rules but not played may be lifted, without penalty, and the player must then proceed correctly.

The definition of substituted ball makes it sound like if you were to drop another ball while your original ball was still in play, the incorrectly substituted ball would become the ball in-play.  You would however, have the opportunity to correct the error under 20-6.  In fact, that's no different than the original scenario.  If your ball cannot be found but does not meet the definition of a "lost ball" it is still in-play, but if you drop another one, the new ball becomes the ball in-play the moment it is dropped, whether in the right place or wrong place.

Apologies for beating this poor horse, but discussing this has been quite a revelation for me, so I want to be sure I get it 100% correct.


Posted
Quote:
1) If the ball was not in play before being placed or dropped

Ah wait…I think a light bulb just went on.  You mean if a ball has not been put into play from the teeing ground.  In that case, any drop would not put a ball into play, only a stroke would.

Sorry for having to go around the world to arrive at that answer.


Posted

You seem to have it :dance:

Re your case re dropping a second ball when you already have a ball on the fairway: if you were just checking your identification marks on the second ball and accidentally dropped it, it would not become the ball in play as there was no intention to put it into play


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just following up on this thread.  I did email the USGA to see if there were any additional situations when a dropped/placed ball would not be in play.

The email specifically prohibits me from pasting the text of the response, so I'll just summarize:

Rulesman nailed it.  The two situations when a dropped/placed ball is not in play are:

1)  When a ball has not yet been put into play from the teeing ground

2)  When the player had no intention of putting the ball into play.

Two additional clarifications came out of which I was not aware:

1)  The ball is in play as soon as it leaves the player's hand

2)  It is not necessary for the ball to come to rest to be in-play


Posted

Two additional clarifications came out of which I was not aware:

1)  The ball is in play as soon as it leaves the player's hand

2)  It is not necessary for the ball to come to rest to be in-play

Those are interesting but I find them a little confusing.  What if the ball is dropped (in play as soon as it laves the player's hand) but then it rolls too far to be a legal drop and has to be re-dropped.  Was it in play and then out of play?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Those are interesting but I find them a little confusing.  What if the ball is dropped (in play as soon as it laves the player's hand) but then it rolls too far to be a legal drop and has to be re-dropped.  Was it in play and then out of play?

No, it was always in-play.  However, the rules require you to re-drop the ball in that situation.  This was one of my misconceptions too.  I thought a drop which violated one of the provisions of 20-2(c) invalidated the drop.  However, if you look, you'll see nowhere under 20-2(c) does it say a drop is invalid.  It simply gives you a list of situations under which you MUST re-drop the ball.

The same is true if you drop in wrong place, drop when you're supposed to place, place when you're supposed to drop, or substitute a ball when you're not allowed to do so.  The ball is still in-play in those situations, but 20-6 gives you the opportunity to correct the mistake before you play the ball.


Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtleback View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadesworld View Post

Two additional clarifications came out of which I was not aware:

1)  The ball is in play as soon as it leaves the player's hand

2)  It is not necessary for the ball to come to rest to be in-play

Those are interesting but I find them a little confusing.  What if the ball is dropped (in play as soon as it laves the player's hand) but then it rolls too far to be a legal drop and has to be re-dropped.  Was it in play and then out of play?

Just because the ball rolls to place which is not allowed, that doesn't take it out of play.  Definition of ball in play :

Quote:

Ball In Play

A ball is “ in play ” as soon as the player has made a stroke on the teeing ground . It remains in play until it is holed , except when it is lost , out of bounds or lifted, or another ball has been substituted , whether or not the substitution is permitted; a ball so substituted becomes the ball in play .

There is no differentiation between a ball dropped correctly or incorrectly.  Both are in play the moment they leave the player's hand, and they remain in play until their status meets the requirement for taking them out of play.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.