Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Garmin S4 Notifications on Android


Note: This thread is 4026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Searched all over the forums but could not find a definitive answer.

I have a Galaxy S4 phone running Android 4.4.4. Will the Garmin S4 talk to it? Make or break for me on this device. Thx!


  • Moderator
Posted

I think just for iPhone.

https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/into-sports/golfing/approach-s4/prod140528.html

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Any company that can't integrate with all mobile devices is behind the 8 ball. I would not buy it just because of their idiotic commercial. Why don't you just call Garmin and ask? I am sure they have a solid tech support service.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Any company that can't integrate with all mobile devices is behind the 8 ball.

You realize how difficult this task would be? Android phones aren't like iPhones. There are so many different types of devices and versions of the OS out there that developers would have to troubleshoot that most don't even bother (or have the resources to try).

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You realize how difficult this task would be? Android phones aren't like iPhones. There are so many different types of devices and versions of the OS out there that developers would have to troubleshoot that most don't even bother (or have the resources to try).


Many other companies do it without issue. It's just transfer and display of information.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Many other companies do it without issue.

[spoiler=OT]I doubt that they integrate with all mobile devices without issue. More likely, they target the most popular or more likely scenarios and work on them. If you're running Android 2.2 on a 5 year old phone, you're probably SOL on a lot of apps, but if you have that combination then you probably don't care about apps in the first place.[/spoiler]I agree that the easy thing to do seems to be to contact Garmin.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

Any company that can't integrate with all mobile devices is behind the 8 ball.

You realize how difficult this task would be? Android phones aren't like iPhones. There are so many different types of devices and versions of the OS out there that developers would have to troubleshoot that most don't even bother (or have the resources to try).

More Samsung phones are sold worldwide than iPhones, along with LG, Nokia, etc (not to mention tablets), and the majority are on Android.  It should be in Garmin's best interests to port to Android - they should certainly have the resources to do it, and do it right.  If they don't somebody will jump to fill that need, and Garmin will be seen as little more than an Apple subsidiary - not good for the reputation they have built as the leader in consumer GPS.  Most of the small planes I've flown in around the world have Garmin GPS on the instrument panel.  They should certainly be able to program for Android.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
More Samsung phones are sold worldwide than iPhones, along with LG, Nokia, etc (not to mention tablets), and the majority are on Android.  It should be in Garmin's best interests to port to Android - they should certainly have the resources to do it, and do it right.  If they don't somebody will jump to fill that need, and Garmin will be seen as little more than an Apple subsidiary - not good for the reputation they have built as the leader in consumer GPS.  Most of the small planes I've flown in around the world have Garmin GPS on the instrument panel.  They should certainly be able to program for Android.

Yes, Samsung owns the largest share of all Android device producers. It would be odd if Garmin is not supported on a Samsung device.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
More Samsung phones are sold worldwide than iPhones, along with LG, Nokia, etc (not to mention tablets), and the majority are on Android.  It should be in Garmin's best interests to port to Android - they should certainly have the resources to do it, and do it right.  If they don't somebody will jump to fill that need, and Garmin will be seen as little more than an Apple subsidiary - not good for the reputation they have built as the leader in consumer GPS.  Most of the small planes I've flown in around the world have Garmin GPS on the instrument panel.  They should certainly be able to program for Android.


You're not a developer. There is a reason, and Bill wrote about it above, why many, many apps are available on the iPhone first and/or only.

Android is highly fragmented. More "Samsung" phones are sold, yes, but they need to account for all manner of hardware AND software combinations that simply aren't anywhere near as plentiful as on the iPhone/iOS devices.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The thing that baffles me is that it is just Bluetooth and that is a specification that is independent from the OS or hardware. What is most likely happening is that Apple adds features or slightly modifies the spec to keep some accessory market share for itself and partners. This then forces companies like Garmin to either pick one or potentially over extend themselves from an IT perspective to support both.

Regarding the original question, I have seen no where on the internet that explicitly confirms the support (first hand user experience), even on Garmin's site. The best I found was this page:

http://support.garmin.com/support/searchSupport/case.faces?caseId=%7bbbfc9660-8f77-11e3-d5f4-000000000000%7d

This would lead most fair minded people to believe the Approach S4 WILL work on Android for the listed devices.

In the end I opted to go with the Bushnell Neo XS. I decided simpler was better. I don't need a smart watch, just a number to the center. (If I want a smart watch I'll grab a Samsung watch which I am tempted to do...)

Thanks for the discussion.


Posted
What is most likely happening is that Apple adds features or slightly modifies the spec to keep some accessory market share for itself and partners. Which is why I stay away from apple products.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
What is most likely happening is that Apple adds features or slightly modifies the spec to keep some accessory market share for itself and partners.

Which is why I stay away from apple products.


Uhm, no. BTLE is BTLE.

iOS products are a better target. Their users are higher income, the platform and API are more consistent, etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

What is most likely happening is that Apple adds features or slightly modifies the spec to keep some accessory market share for itself and partners.

Which is why I stay away from apple products.

Uhm, no. BTLE is BTLE.

iOS products are a better target. Their users are higher income, the platform and API are more consistent, etc.

I need to see you back up that statement.  My Galaxy S5 (Verizon) was in the neighborhood of $600 - a bit less with a 2 year contract.  You aren't likely to find them with many people on the government dole.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
I need to see you back up that statement.  My Galaxy S5 (Verizon) was in the neighborhood of $600 - a bit less with a 2 year contract.  You aren't likely to find them with many people on the government dole.


Back to the topic, please.

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/technology/apple/android-vs-ios-how-users-are-the-biggest-difference.html

Let’s start with the basics: According to research reported by DazeInfo, iOS users are more loyal than Android users, in terms of who intends to stay with the operating system following their next smartphone upgrade. iOS users also have more spending power than Android users, have higher income than Android users, and the average iOS user spends a lot more time on the internet than the average Android user. But here’s why iOS users are more profitable for Apple: Android owns 80.2 percent of smartphone market share worldwide, while Apple owns just 14.8 percent. Apple focuses on the premium customer in a mature market, while Android is used everywhere, by every type of customer.

http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Blog/Android-vs-iOS-User-Differences-Every-Developer-Should-Know

iPhone Users are Slightly Younger and More Affluent
iOS is popular among a slightly younger demographic than Android users, with 18-24 year olds representing 19 percent of all iPhone owners compared to 16 percent of Android owners. That said, Android users on the whole skew younger than the total U.S. mobile market, indicating that they still have a very attractive profile on this dimension. Another important demographic difference is average household income, with 41 percent of iPhone owners falling in the $100,000+ income segment vs. 24 percent of Android owners. With iPhones selling at a higher average price point than most Android phones, this difference should not be a complete surprise. Still, it may be an important differentiator for marketers.

There are a bunch more articles out there about this.

And @Fourputt , c'mon, you're one data point. :-P

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[SPOILER=OT][quote name="iacas" url="/t/78675/garmin-s4-notifications-on-android/0_20#post_1086062"] Uhm, no. BTLE is BTLE. iOS products are a better target. Their users are higher income, the platform and API are more consistent, etc. [/quote] Android is a stellar platform and people who want some freedom in their phone use it plus it works just as well for noobies that do nothing with it. Apple may have function over PC but it has nothing over an Android. Company perception that iphones are more advantageous to cater to for product due to media exposure is a mistake. You will be left behind if you only stay with one platform. Garmin is failing here if they don't have Android accessibility.[/SPOILER]

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Android is a stellar platform and people who want some freedom in their phone use it plus it works just as well for noobies that do nothing with it.

So, having been caught in a blatant lie, now you're just sharing your opinions (yet stating them as if they're universal truths). Okay.

Apple may have function over PC but it has nothing over an Android. Company perception that iphones are more advantageous to cater to for product due to media exposure is a mistake. You will be left behind if you only stay with one platform. Garmin is failing here if they don't have Android accessibility.

A lot of companies don't feel that way. There are still a lot of companies who release for iOS first and some who release for iOS only.

Again, let's stick to the topic, please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.