Jump to content
IGNORED

2015 NCAA Football


Note: This thread is 3284 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

For either Clemson or Alabama to lose would be a stunner. I like MSU to beat Iowa and get in. Oklahoma is already there.

After a big relief against TTUN, I'm ready to leave it there and not try to play the crazy scenario game.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just to look at some odds,

From ESPN, Clemson has a 59% chance to win. Alabama has a 79% chance of winning. Stanford has a 49% chance of winning. Michigan State has a 64% chance of winning. 

Right now the rankings are,
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. OU
4. Iowa
5. Michigan State
6. Ohio State
7. Stanford
10. North Carolina

For Ohio State to get in they would probably need Stanford to lose to knock out that Pac-12 champ.  Then they would need either Clemson or Alabama to lose. I am not sure I see North Carolina jumping up 6 spots to #4. It took Ohio State a 55-0 drumming to pass TCU and Baylor last year to sneak in. Unless North Carolina wins by more than 2-TD's I don't seem them jumping that high. 

Running the percentages Ohio State has a 31% chance of making the college football playoffs. 

The only tricky part would be if MSU beats Iowa, does Iowa get another shot over Ohio State. 

So Go Trojans and Go Tar Heels, and on an off chance Go Gators :) 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So no underdog was willing to step up. Though North Carolina made it interesting, yet the refs screwed them over royally with that BS off sides call on the onside kick. 

Just for kicks lets expand the playoff into a top 8 scenario :) With my odds :p 

Clemson v Notre Dame (THE REMATCH!), -2 Clemson 
Alabama v Ohio State (THE REMATCH!), -3 Alabama
Michigan State v Stanford (THE REMATCH FROM 2014 :p), -6 Stanford
OU v Iowa (Ummm), -14 OU

Really Iowa doesn't belong anywhere near the top 8. Though they won 11 games. They overachieved way too much this year. Their metrics said they should be 9-3. I think Florida State or TCU would be a better option. 

I would take a weekend of these match ups anytime :) 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

So no underdog was willing to step up.  

It's not so much unwilling[1] as Stanford had that one player who proved too much to handle.  I think USC would have had a much better chance of winning if that guy had declared for the NFL draft a year ago (or just slept in that day).

I don't follow college football so I don't know who that player was, but I did see that game and there was a Stanford player who seemed to be everywhere. 

 

[1] I knew what you meant, don't worry :-)

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3284 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...