Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How does the particular golf course being played impact some of the conventional wisdom I've read on this site. For example, hitting driver 250 but off target is better than hitting hybrid 200 in the fairway. I ask because in PHX, we play desert golf primarily. The desert, especially at the nicer courses, is often very penal. If you're off of the fairway, even if you find your ball, it is likely an unplayable lie. In addition, your drop from said unplayable lie is unlikely to put you in a position where a full swing is possible.

For this reason, many courses have a local "desert" rule. This allows one to play the desert as a lateral hazard. This rule is outside the rules of golf.

I've played the majority of my golf in Arizona, so feedback on how parkland style and other style course strategy differ if they do.


Posted

If the desert is unplayable the majority of the time then that would be something that you try to avoid whenever possible and maybe driver isn't the right play...

Off the tee we want to advance the ball as far as possible while still having a good/decent second shot.  Its the combo of both lie and distance, not one or the other.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've played the majority of my golf in Arizona, so feedback on how parkland style and other style course strategy differ if they do.

I would say the desert sounds like it plays like a water hazard. You are basically going to lose a stroke on average.

In that regard you want to make sure your shot zone doesn't come with in 10 yards of the desert.

If it is a long par 4, you and lets say the desert encroaches on 20% of your shot zone, you might take the risk knowing you will end up with a much shorter shot than hitting a 3-wood or hybrid. Depends on how much risk you want to take on.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How does the particular golf course being played impact some of the conventional wisdom I've read on this site.

Well, it sort of doesn't affect the conventional wisdom at all, because that type of thing is factored into said wisdom.  For example, the main LSW "rule" is to, quite simply, shorten the distance between the ball and the hole as much as possible, safely , with every shot.

Don't think I have the quote right, but its something close to that.  Anyway, if you're playing a course that is very penal in the junk, versus an open course that doesn't really have junk, but rather other fairways, then that rule gets applied very differently.

Penalty strokes need to be avoided at all costs, so you would be right to consider hybrid off the tee often in your scenario, I imagine.

I play a similar course here pretty often where nearly the entire back 9 is all canyons and ravines off the fairway, so I am going to start cutting back off of driver and just start hitting all 3 woods and hybrids off of those tees because I've been too wild with the driver, leading to many penalty strokes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've already started to adjust my game to avoid the penalty shots as a priority. Primarily b/c a shot in to the desert is worse than a water hazard as the water is just a stroke rather than stroke and distance. I'm just curious if there were any statistics on desert vs parkland vs links etc.


  • Administrator
Posted

How does the particular golf course being played impact some of the conventional wisdom I've read on this site. For example, hitting driver 250 but off target is better than hitting hybrid 200 in the fairway. I ask because in PHX, we play desert golf primarily. The desert, especially at the nicer courses, is often very penal. If you're off of the fairway, even if you find your ball, it is likely an unplayable lie. In addition, your drop from said unplayable lie is unlikely to put you in a position where a full swing is possible.

@jgreen85 , have you bought and read a copy of Lowest Score Wins yet?

Well, it sort of doesn't affect the conventional wisdom at all, because that type of thing is factored into said wisdom.  For example, the main LSW "rule" is to, quite simply, shorten the distance between the ball and the hole as much as possible, safely, with every shot.

Don't think I have the quote right, but its something close to that.  Anyway, if you're playing a course that is very penal in the junk, versus an open course that doesn't really have junk, but rather other fairways, then that rule gets applied very differently.

Penalty strokes need to be avoided at all costs, so you would be right to consider hybrid off the tee often in your scenario, I imagine.

I play a similar course here pretty often where nearly the entire back 9 is all canyons and ravines off the fairway, so I am going to start cutting back off of driver and just start hitting all 3 woods and hybrids off of those tees because I've been too wild with the driver, leading to many penalty strokes.

That's the very brief version of it, but… yeah, I'd recommend you check it out. The "conventional" wisdom from the book, the site, etc. that you'll learn is often directly against the actual "conventional" wisdom that you'll find out in the world.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
@jgreen85 , have you bought and read a copy of Lowest Score Wins yet? That's the very brief version of it, but… yeah, I'd recommend you check it out. The "conventional" wisdom from the book, the site, etc. that you'll learn is often directly against the actual "conventional" wisdom that you'll find out in the world.

@iacas I'd like to buy a copy of the book. Is there a link here somewhere to direct order?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
@iacas I'd like to buy a copy of the book. Is there a link here somewhere to direct order?

Never mind, I found the link via the search function and ordered my copy.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.