Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6398 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Do you have a hybrid in your bag?

    • Yes
      426
    • No
      107
    • Soon!
      75


Recommended Posts

Posted
i recently bought a 18° calloway X Hybrid 2Hso far so good. i dont have a 3 iron or any fairway woods so i had a large gap inbetween my 4 iron and driver so this fills it nicely.

In my wasabe green ozone bag:

Hibore 9.5° w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft Driver

G10 15° 1H w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft G10 18° 2H w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft T-Zoid Pro 3-PW S300 CG10 52° 2 Dot Black Pearl CG10 56° 2 Dot Black Pearl Newport 2 TerylliumLow Score = 88


  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
i have the ben hogan hybrid, and im now a hybrid guy, it saves me multiple times with its ease of use. however i looking to upgrade to more of a "players" hybrid, like the titleist 585.

WITB:
983k 9.5 - Aldila NV65
Apex Hybrid
755 - Project X flighted - 4-PW
Vokey 200 Series - 52 Vokey SM - 56,60 Rossa Mezza Monza


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
The 503h had too much offset for me. I also like the set up of the 585h. It's more iron like and it seems easily useable from many lies. I have ys6+fw in both my 13 and 17 904f's and love them. The ys6+ hybrid is heavier and much less torque but I seem to get some great shots out of it. I'm thinking about going to our fitter next spring and trying out either the 20 degree Callaway fusion or whatever they are coming out with in the spring for fusion hybrids. I had an ft-5 fit with a 65 v2 this year and love it. I'm not sure about the set up of the callaway hybrids as they look like woods but I'll see.

Driver: FT-5 9.5 65g V2 stiff
3 wood: 904f 13 YS6fw+ stiff
4 wood: 904f 17 YS6fw+ stiff
Hybrid: 585.h 21 YShybrid+ stiff
Irons: MP 60 4-PW NSPro950 stiff stepped-1Wedges: MP-R 52.07,56.10,60.09 NSPro950 stiff stepped-1Putter: Scotty Cameron Red X2 33"Ball: ProV1


Posted
I feel the same about my 503h. It feels more like one of the old driving irons. It's very hard to hit in the 19* loft. It has been in time out all year. I bought it for a couple of the longer par 3's, 220+, I play weekly but found that I can hit my Hogan 3 hybrid just as far or in many cases farther when you factor in the terrible contact I made at times with the 503. I am looking to add the 585h to replace the 503 and possibly the Hogan as well.
Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I just picked up a 503 since I was hitting my buddies Mizuno Hifli so well. I like the Iron design over the Hybrid. It's replacing an old Adam tight lie. I guess I'll need to try it out.....


Posted
I use adams hybrids. i started wiht the A2 set that cam with 3 & 4 iron hybrids. Man they are easy to hit. I was told to but the hybrids first since i was just starting out. I dont think i will ever use old irons again. i am now going to get the 5 & 6 Adams pro hybrids. i just started playing about a month ago and i can get them in the air staright 180 to 200.

Driver: Pinemeadows Bloc Driver 10
Hybrid: Adams A2 3 and 4 iron stiff
Irons: A2 hybrid irons
Wedges: Golf Smith 56 and 60 Degree
Putter: Pinemeadows bladeBall: Nike Power Distance softBag: Datrek Icon


Posted
The older titleist 503H hybrids i found fitted my eye much better than the newer wood like hybrids. I presume, like yourself, did not want to deviate to much from the irrefutable control irons have over woods, thus stuck with the 503H hybrids.

Unfortunately, almost all manufacturers these days are tranferring technology of lower perimeter weighting and increasing MOI into all facets of club design, including hybrids, so we are basically seeing these iron-like hybrids being fazed out.

I personally use a 2 and 4 Callaway FT hyrbid which i am reasonably happy with. great stock shaft in the Aldila NVS, however, launches a little high for my liking. Good selection of club choices with either draw of neutral bias depending on swing. The only complaint that i have with them is that due to the technology and movement towards forgiveness, i feel as through these clubs don't give you great feedback regarding where you've hit the ball on the club face. Basically, every shot feels the same, thus, for a better player such as yourself, sticking to the Titleists isn't a bad idea.

If you are after a better player's hybrid, have a look at the Adams Idea Pro hybrids. Aldila Prototype shafts as standard, more iron like appearance, however, very little offset. Should be right up your alley !!!

What's in my bag:

Driver: r7 9.5 deg, Fujikura Speeder 757 S
3 wood: G5 13 deg, Grafalloy ProLaunch Blue, S
2 Hybrid: 2H FT hybrid, Aldila NVS S4 Hybrid: 4H FT hybrid, Adlila NVS SIrons: 5-PW Big Bertha 04, UniflexWedges: CG10 52 deg, 56 deg, 60 deg, Black PearlPutter: Ug-Le 34"Ball: ...


Posted
thats what i am looking to get now. i have the 3 and 4 hybrids out of my set but will be geting the 5 and 6 iron. i can hit the 7-9 pretty good. they just make a diffrence.

Driver: Pinemeadows Bloc Driver 10
Hybrid: Adams A2 3 and 4 iron stiff
Irons: A2 hybrid irons
Wedges: Golf Smith 56 and 60 Degree
Putter: Pinemeadows bladeBall: Nike Power Distance softBag: Datrek Icon


Posted
I have a Cleveland Halo 19* in there now. They're so easy to hit it's silly.

Cleveland Launcher Comp, 9.5* stiff
TaylorMade V-Steel, T/S stiff
Cleveland Halo, 19* stiff
Mizuno MP-32, stiff
Cleveland 588 Gunmetal, 51*Cleveland 588 DSG RTG, 56*Scotty Cameron Newport II


Posted
I'm sticking to the driver > 3 & 5 wood > 3-9 iron > PW & SW wedge > putter .

I think hybrids are just another way for golf manufacturers to make more money.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
I'm sticking to the

They are also a way for you to shoot

lower golf scores.

Cleveland Launcher Comp, 9.5* stiff
TaylorMade V-Steel, T/S stiff
Cleveland Halo, 19* stiff
Mizuno MP-32, stiff
Cleveland 588 Gunmetal, 51*Cleveland 588 DSG RTG, 56*Scotty Cameron Newport II


Posted
They are also a way for you to shoot

Well, call me a

traditionalist , I'd rather do that by: a) using the classic club setup, and b) improving my game using those clubs. And before anyone attacks, yes, I do use cavity-backs (at the moment) and a 460cc driver!
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
Well, call me a

In that case, we can't you a

traditionalist . I have 1 hybrid for now, a Taylormade Dual Rescue 19° (3 hybrid) that replaced my 5 wood. At the same time I replaced my 3 iron with a 52° gap wedge. I'm thinking about adding an Adams Idea Pro (5 hybrid) to replace my 4 iron. Not sure yet.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
In that case, we can't you a

Okay, so I'm a traditionalist at heart!

Anyway, I'm looking to get blades before the year is out and I'm not even breaking 90 yet. Am I mad? Maybe. Do I care? No. Will it help me hit a golf ball correctly? Of course.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
I feel the same about my 503h. It feels more like one of the old driving irons. It's very hard to hit in the 19* loft. It has been in time out all year. I bought it for a couple of the longer par 3's, 220+, I play weekly but found that I can hit my Hogan 3 hybrid just as far or in many cases farther when you factor in the terrible contact I made at times with the 503. I am looking to add the 585h to replace the 503 and possibly the Hogan as well.

I tried hitting mine today and it was very tough. I think the 19* is a bit low. Maybe I need a 24* or so?


Posted
Okay, so I'm a traditionalist at heart!

I play blades, too, just not a 4 iron.

Well, actually, yes I do, right now , because I just haven't gotten the right hybrid to replace it, but when I do, rest assured I'll take the 4 out of the bag. If you want to be a traditionalist, why not fire it up with a brassie, a spoon, 1930's blades and maybe a niblick or two?

Cleveland Launcher Comp, 9.5* stiff
TaylorMade V-Steel, T/S stiff
Cleveland Halo, 19* stiff
Mizuno MP-32, stiff
Cleveland 588 Gunmetal, 51*Cleveland 588 DSG RTG, 56*Scotty Cameron Newport II


  • 1 month later...
Posted
I have a Cleveland hybrid that I won at a golf tournament, its a 25 degree with a DG r shaft, It replaced my 4 iron and its very versatile, I can hit it from 160 yards to 190 yards. Today, I hit my hybrid into the wind to 160 yards and was pin high and sank my 30 foot putt for birdie.

I wonder when Tiger is going to start caring one? maybe in his 40s, on a side note, my daughter's going to turn 7 on 12/30, does anybody know who else has a birthay on that day?

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
Go to wikipedia and look up that date.

Whats in my Warbird Hot Bad:

Driver: 907D1 9.5 - 65-S Aldila VS Proto --- FT-IQ coming soon?
2 Hybrid: Rescue mid-TP 16 deg
3 Hybrid: Rescue TP - HC Tour Only Model 19 deg - DG X-1004-PW: 695CB Irons - Project X 6.0Wedges Vokey SM58, Vokey SM54, Vokey 250Putter Futura PhantomWhere I WorkMy...


Note: This thread is 6398 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.