Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3376 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been playing footjoys for as long as I can remember and have typically spent from $120 - $180 for a pair.  I am an old timer and fan of the saddle style shoes they make and always insisted on leather with a multiple year waterproof guarantee.  This past August the sole separated from the top of the shoe and could not be repaired - This was the second season with the pair of Contours.  So off the Dicks and since it is late in the season there were plenty of good footjoys in size 13, but nothing in my size.  They did have a pair of the saddle greenjoys with a synthetic upper in my size on closeout for $49 and with my coupon I paid about $38.  I have played multiple rounds including in some rain and they are as comfortable as I would expect from a footjoy and provide excellent support and traction.  Again, I have had them for a short time, but looking for some opinions on the durability of the greenjoys.  Have I been wasting my money all these years?  I usually get 2-3 seasons out of a pair of golf shoes.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

My first pair of cleats were Nikes ($80) and they took incredible abuse from all those bad lies in my first two seasons. Last week I noticed the waterproofing finally wore off (wet socks). 

I also bought some Greenjoys from Golfsmith on clearance, about $40. I plan to wear them next year when the sun returns. I'm curious what people think of these. For half the price I figured it was a gamble worth taking.

 

 

Edited by Kalnoky
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My Spaulding golf shoes (with soft spikes) are at least 20+ years old. They still look pretty good. Why ? Because I seldom ever wear them. Most of the time all I wear are comfortable walking shoes. Other times tennis shoes. Only time I wear my golf shoes is if the course requires them, and I can't remember the last time I was required to do so. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I got the same shoes from the same place at the same price. My verdict is that they are adequate. Not sure if I'd have gotten anymore shoe had I paid more.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've never tried the GreenJoys, but I like the DryJoys Tour and they are excellent in terms of water proofing.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3376 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.