Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3326 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, carpediem4300 said:

Just my 2 cents having had a little gander through that stubbornness thread and your thread here reference to the steepness, im slightly thrown by the phrase "increase shoulder tilt" and "flatten the club at the top", perhaps im missing which part of the swing you are trying to increase tilt? one would thing the more you increase tilt on the back swing the more you increase steepness of the club (if nothing else changes), or have I read that into this wrong?

 

 

That is true.  Increasing shoulder tilt should increase the steepness of the club on the backswing and downswing.   Even more reason to flatten my downswing. 

I think my instructor probably would have had me work on flattening my swing even if he had not increased my shoulder tilt, because there are so many beneficial effects of the flattening move.  But the increased shoulder tilt does seem to make flattening the swing a little more urgent.  Because it does put the club even farther up in the air on the back swing. 

Of course, the reason for fixing the shoulder tilt was because lack of shoulder tilt meant that on the down swing my right shoulder came out instead of down, causing me to cast the club over the top. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, Marty2019 said:

Of course, the reason for fixing the shoulder tilt was because lack of shoulder tilt meant that on the down swing my right shoulder came out instead of down, causing me to cast the club over the top.

Far be it from me to offer advice, but I'll say that I think I've learned this much through this process:

For me, the direction that the hands move from the top has more impact on my steepness than shoulder tilt seems to: 

  1. If I drop my hands from the top vertically, the club WITHOUT EFFORT steepens and even crosses over toward the ball side of your hands (looking down the line)
  2. If I initially move the hands horizontally toward the ball (like spinning horizontally standing in a barrel), the club WITHOUT EFFORT flattens.

That may or not ring true with you or be relevant to you and your specific issues, but it's something I seem to re-learn. I also believe it was mentioned in the steepness thread and has been mentioned by my instructor.  "more merry-go-round and less ferris wheel" is what I have heard. For some reason, I have this long muscle memory of wanting to swing my arms so vertically (that's my theory anyway).

If I'm wrong, I hope an instructor chimes in, of course!

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, RandallT said:
  1. If I drop my hands from the top vertically, the club WITHOUT EFFORT steepens and even crosses over toward the ball side of your hands (looking down the line)
  2. If I initially move the hands horizontally toward the ball (like spinning horizontally standing in a barrel), the club WITHOUT EFFORT flattens.

Those are both true, but at the same time, the forces needed to counter those "without effort" motions are pretty small, too, and the club will have some momentum of its own, so they don't work for everyone.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3326 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.