Jump to content
IGNORED

Poor Instruction Is Very Common. Why?


Jack Watson
 Share

Note: This thread is 1498 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

I don't think the pivot has as much to do with it as it sounds like you think it does.

I've seen terrible pivots, but people who just have a knack for "finding the golf ball" and some good hands shoot in the low 70s.

I've seen complete arm-swingers get to scratch golf with little more than a 45° turn. They struggle from there, and have a few compensations, but it can happen.

I wouldn't limit it to just the pivot. Some people just have a knack for "finding the ball" with some good speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Just now, Jack Watson said:

Yeah,  bottom line is certain individuals can and do improve really really quickly.  They do so much much faster than average joe.

I'd say some individuals shoot lower scores more quickly than others… some are setting themselves up for a ceiling (or a scoring floor), too, by the swings they "create" for themselves.

It's more about "finding the golf ball" for me, though, than "making a good pivot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The original point was why is there so much bad instruction. I think there are basically two reasons, One, there's money in them there bad golf tips! Or two, "I'm the smartest guy I know, so I must be the smartest guy on the range!"

As for swing styles and pivot, I played a lot of golf with a buddy who was all upper body. Total arm swinger! Legs looked like they were rooted in the ground. But, he was a big guy, 6'3" - 220, and he could crush the ball!

Oddly, or maybe not, he could not hit his Driver to save his life! So, he teed off with a 3 wood. Sound familiar anybody? And he was doing this 30+ years ago. Go with the club you can hit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/8/2017 at 9:26 PM, Jack Watson said:

To me a person who refers to the swing as simple physics is really only advertising their personal lack of understanding of physics.

Yeah, no. My masters in engineering would say otherwise. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
5 hours ago, Apoc81 said:

Yeah, no. My masters in engineering would say otherwise. 

Engineers can be very good at what they do.  In terms of mechanical/electrical engineers that I have experience with often they are very poor at troubleshooting.  Sure,  calcs and design are one thing,  but troubleshooting existing systems is another.   

I agree with Iacas.  The human element in our game is very different from simply designing some iron Byron contraption to make tests.

In fact imo in golf everything is a trade off.  

I stand by my comment that simply reducing it to some inane comment that anyone can play around with their move and become good by simple physics is ludicrous.

There is NO data that supports such a preposterous assertion.

One thing I will say is that for an instructor to be one of quality they must possess a knack for it.

People with a knack get to the root causes not symptoms.

I will say I definitely would never assert being a good instructor is simple physics imo it would have to be so much more.  In a way I think it's no wonder there is a lack of good instruction available.

 

 

 

Edited by Jack Watson
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Although poor professional instruction is common,  I highly recommend people going to pros and getting lessons over buying clubs and so forth.

Taking matters into ones own hands isn't gonna work 99.5% of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas changed the title to Poor Instruction Is Very Common. Why?
Note: This thread is 1498 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • That really seems to be a rational approach to this. We aren’t going back to the old school names; (I don’t think…) ? And iron numbers have been rendered meaningless. So you approach creating a club set by saying,” well, I need a driver, a fairway club around 18 degrees, and a …..”   I think this says it pretty well! 
    • Having switched to blade irons this year I fully agree. It was surprising to me how forgiving they actually are on mishits. They seem more consistent overall to me with decent contact somewhere on the face. Maybe the big sole on GI irons help a bit more with a fat shot, idk. The feedback with blades is great, I love that.
    • And that’s it isn’t it? If you don’t hit a club well, and you’ve given it a thorough trial, why fight the obvious? Try something else! Or ask, “do I really need this club?” And as a case in point, it seems you’ve found an older driver that you really like and hit well. I really don’t believe we play this game for the purpose of keeping the club manufacturers in business.
    • Bought a Pure Plane Pro. Actually two. I forgot I got it the first time and it didn't arrive so got another and they both eventually came which actually works out because it turns out I'd want two. Got tired of carrying the DIY PVC that holds the sticks around (as you can see in the photo below, the PVC takes up a lot more space), thanks for the tips Erik, they served me well, and like the portability of the PPP. Usually this kind of aid is a lot more expensive because it's made of solid metal I guess and the PPP is made of plastic except the screws(?). Not sure of the longevity, will have to see, but I like the product overall, using clubs to anchor the PPP is brilliant. It's small, easy to setup, pretty adjustable and I've yet to use it in more creative ways. If you have a nub in your alignment stick, you'll have to take it off to fit the notch (see third photo, bottom notch nub is sticking out). I've learned to put it back upright after hitting the stick without kneeling over, lol. Now that I don't have to carry PVC around, it's a lot less likely someone will yell out to me, its-a me-a, Mario! This is a rapid hit first impression, I'll post more as I gain more experience with it.
    • I'd love to see OEMs identify their clubs by loft rather than an arbitrary number. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Nevsteve
      Nevsteve
      (62 years old)
    2. Pab4141
      Pab4141
      (28 years old)
    3. rdpoffenberger
      rdpoffenberger
      (36 years old)
    4. Salem Golfer
      Salem Golfer
      (56 years old)
    5. stothemc
      stothemc
      (38 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...