Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking at the TaylorMade RBZ adapter and wanting to know this: Can you use this adapter to turn your regular driver into one like the RBZ drivers? It seems like it should be possible.


  • Moderator
Posted
17 minutes ago, seekingone said:

I am looking at the TaylorMade RBZ adapter and wanting to know this: Can you use this adapter to turn your regular driver into one like the RBZ drivers? It seems like it should be possible.

The head and adapter have to match.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am not fully following your comment. The driver heads are usually .335 and the irons are mostly

.37. Are you saying, if the adapters are this size, I can convert my driver to one like the RBZ? 


  • Moderator
Posted
Just now, seekingone said:

I am not fully following your comment. The driver heads are usually .335 and the irons are mostly

.37. Are you saying, if the adapters are this size, I can convert my driver to one like the RBZ? 

Are you just wanting to put your shaft on the RBZ? 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

U can't turn a non adjustable driver into an adjustable driver.  So u can't take for example a  Taylormade 540 driver head where the shaft is glued into the hosel and put a shaft with the adapter on it in that Taylormade 540 head.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thank you for that info. I have been wondering about it for sometime. It seems strange that someone has not found a way to do that. I wish they would. Surely it can't be that hard.


Posted
1 hour ago, seekingone said:

Thank you for that info. I have been wondering about it for sometime. It seems strange that someone has not found a way to do that. I wish they would. Surely it can't be that hard.

You would have to completely change the club head. Non-adjustable clubs have shafts epoxied into the head. Adjustable clubs have differently design heads. The shaft goes through the head basically, and attaches underneath with a screw. 

I think it would be a very difficult, nigh on impossible, conversion


Posted
6 hours ago, FrivolouslyWasted said:

You would have to completely change the club head. Non-adjustable clubs have shafts epoxied into the head. Adjustable clubs have differently design heads. The shaft goes through the head basically, and attaches underneath with a screw. 

I think it would be a very difficult, nigh on impossible, conversion

Not as impossible as you think, and here's why.

Realistically you only would need to design 2 parts. One is a socket that is epoxied into the clubhead and the second is the adapter that goes onto the shaft. The adapter could be held into the clubhead by way of a set screw (or 2 or 3) on the collar of the socket that fits into indents on the adapter, allowing for set positions of rotation within the socket and providing the desired adjustments.

The reason they don't do this is because it wouldn't be profitable. You'd get a few people who would buy them here or there, but overall it would be too small a number to justify the development, marketing, and manufacturing costs. The entire reason clubs now are all adjustable is not, in fact, because it's meant to be a feature for users but because it's meant to be adjustable for fitters and retailers.

The fitter or retailer doesn't need to stock a 9.5* clubhead, a 10.5* clubhead, and a 11.5* clubhead now because those lofts can be achieved with a single clubhead now. It reduces the number of variants of a single club that need to be manufactured and greatly simplifies the whole process since you don't even need all the parts in one place to manufacture a golf club anymore, you can just send the shaft (with an adapter on it) to the distributor separately from the clubheads. You only have to design and manufacture one clubhead, providing greater optimization of manufacturing, that will fill all the roles that different clubheads previously would. 

It's a benefit to the customer because they can change their driver specs if they desire, but that's secondary to the effect the adjustable clubs have on the cost of manufacturing and distribution of new product releases. It's not even a marketing point anymore when selling new clubs because everybody does it, and everybody does it because it reduces manufacturing costs.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.