Jump to content
IGNORED

Different Online Golf Instruction


Beanpats24
Note: This thread is 1893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

So over the past 7-8 years I've looked, studied and tried a lot of different swing styles to improve my game. From Sean Foley to mark Wilson, me and my golf, etc. The only one I can relate to and see immediate improvements was Mike Malaska. Anyone else have an opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


21 minutes ago, Beanpats24 said:

So over the past 7-8 years I've looked, studied and tried a lot of different swing styles to improve my game. From Sean Foley to mark Wilson, me and my golf, etc. The only one I can relate to and see immediate improvements was Mike Malaska. Anyone else have an opinion?

Not familiar with any of them other than Me and My Golf so I assume you're referring to free online instruction videos.  Evolvr is only the same in that it's online.  You work with an actual instructor who analyzes swing videos you submit.  It's not free like the others but I highly recommend it since it's personal instruction.  Not that there's anything wrong with other online content, but if you watch some video titled "how to fix your hook" for example, good as it may be, it may not address the reason why YOU are hooking the ball.

Diego’s Gear
Driver: Callaway Great Big Bertha at 11.5*
5W: Taylormade Jetspeed 19*
Hybrid: Ping G5 22*
Irons: Mizuno MX-23 4-PW
Wedges: Cleveland RTX 2.0 50*, 54*, 58*
Putter: Ping Ketsch 33”
My Swing: https://thesandtrap.com/forums/topic/93417-my-swing-foot-wedge/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Foot Wedge said:

Not familiar with any of them other than Me and My Golf so I assume you're referring to free online instruction videos.  Evolvr is only the same in that it's online.  You work with an actual instructor who analyzes swing videos you submit.  It's not free like the others but I highly recommend it since it's personal instruction.  Not that there's anything wrong with other online content, but if you watch some video titled "how to fix your hook" for example, good as it may be, it may not address the reason why YOU are hooking the ball.

Yes sir, free online is the key. I understand the personal coaching aspect and importance. I just checked evolvr and it is reasonably priced. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
24 minutes ago, Beanpats24 said:

Yes sir, free online is the key. I understand the personal coaching aspect and importance. I just checked evolvr and it is reasonably priced. Thanks

Yeah, the price is unbeatable for what you get, in my opinion.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,035 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Finally. Been waiting for this.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩    
    • 🏅.. First ace??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...