• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Dub

Plasma or LCD???

34 posts in this topic

I need a new TV and have some time off this week to shop around.

Looking for a 50" or something close.

Would appreciate suggestions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

LCD. Plasma have better contrast ratios but burn out much quicker....often can't get insurance of 3 years or beyond over here on plasma.

As for make, try a Sony Bravia - more expensive but very good picture/sound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lcd. Plasma have better contrast ratios but burn out much quicker....often can't get insurance of 3 years or beyond over here on plasma.

+1

as for make, try a sony bravia - more expensive but very good picture/sound.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Wish I could spring for LED but my wife would be pissed if I spent that kind of $$$.

I'll certainly look into the Sony Bravia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definatly go with LCD. I few months ago i bought a 55 inch Samsung LCD. Can;t beat the picture. It is in direct sunlight most of the day and it is still looks good. Tons of compliments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a 50" plasma for about three years now; still great picture and performance. I got the extended warranty and used it once. Otherwise trouble free. I especially like that the picture does not fade out when viewed at a side angle. HDTV big screen is worth it for the Masters if nothing else....

There is a great web site that discusses all such things about AV equipment:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/index.php?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AVS forums are a very good start...

IMHO, whatever you choose, and there are valid arguments for both, if you are serious about your HD set and how the picture looks: get a set that has a user accessible complete Color Management System (CMS). I know the mid/high end Samsung sets do, as I have one and the CMS is tremendous for calibrating it.

Your viewing habits and show preferences should guide you. And btw, plasmas will last longer than you'll want them too. That old saw of dimming is just that. The technology has come a long way - as has that for LCD. Go bigger than you want, you won't ever regret that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the information and insight.


I'm going to go hunting around in the morning.....I think. It looks like a missed some of the big local sales this weekend.....couldn't help it as we were out of town for the holidays.


I've had great luck with Sony products in the past...certainly will look them up first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How important is the swivel feature of the Samsung vs Sony?

It will be angled in a corner in our den.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LCD; we got it because
1. we put it above our gas fireplace and was told a plasma wouldn't tolerate the heat if we used it with any regularity
2. that the plasma would burn out faster...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently got a Panasonic Plasma, 50 inch, 720. It was pretty darn cheap. I researched this pretty much and plamsa have better color and picture. I would put my 720 up against a 1080 LCD. The picture is better, it looks amazing, the price is now 700. As far as life, they are both rated the same now. I have a big bay window and have never noticed the "glare" they talk about with plasmas. It is better in the dark but what TV isn't? For the money I just don't see you going wrong. You aren't going to touch a 50 inch or even 46 LCD for that price and it is the best plasma out since Pioneer got out making them. Everyone that comes over compliments me. I have watched blue ray on mine and on friends 1080 LCD and the picture of a plasma kills them. Also, 600 hz speed. Sports rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Sony Bravia as well. Excellent, highly recommended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Went HHGregg and BestBuy a few minutes ago.

It was a dizzying experience. There are pros and cons each way.

Found a 58" Samsung plasma that was awesome.

Also really liked the 52" Sony Bravia 120 hz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is fun. That is the greatest single purchase I have ever made. I enjoy it every night. Watching movies is great. Highly recommend getting surround sound. The only thing that makes LCDs better now is energy efficiency (or at least what they say in all the geek articles I read). They say the life span is the same in both, I think 25,000 hours or 7 years. I was going to purchase the LCD when I first was looking into it since it is a highly lit room and life things I heard. But after I read and looked around, I was like "wow" I can get a 50 inch TV for that??? I would like to see what the high end plasmas look like. I have the base model and it looks great. They have the THX certified models that are twice the price and I wonder if you could truely see the difference. Not sure. I just couldn't be more happy. I have surround sound, blue ray, and it is a great experience watching movies now. The glass screen is nice to me since it is more durable against touch (toddler). You also get the 600 hz processor so action is crystal clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got 2 plasmas, both Samsung. Love them.

Only negative is the glare. The one in the living room during the daytime gets bad glares, but we have big windows. Other than that, love the plasmas.

Both of mine are 5+ years old and absolutely no problems at all on either. Hell, I think my oldest one is around 7 years old or so. I was an early adopter of flat screen TV sets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, what a day.

I'm not much of a shopper and the crowds were intense but my son and I struggled through.

The decision was made after much debate and could have gone either way. I decided on a Sony 1080p 120hz. We were both smitten with the Samsung plasmas but 75% of the front wall of our den is a window. Glare would have been an issue for us. Had that not been a factor then I things would have gone the other direction.

I guess after- Christmas has local inventories very low. Both shops would have had to order. I went with Crutchfield this time...as I've had great experiences in the past with them.

All of your help was appreciated!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you should find the appropriate settings to give the best possible image.

On my Samsung I changed a lot of settings, included turning off the 100Hz (Europe) to get a good picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      You use the S&D option of Rule 28 at any time you want. It doesn't matter if you can't see it, can't identify it or have it staring you in the face with your ID in dayglo pink. To use either of the other options you have to be able to identify it.
    • The Most Common Swing Flaw
      I'm sure there will be arguments later but there is one piece of information I think a lot of golfers can benefit from. I hope to save some people from buying the online swing tip scams. The most common flaw I see in swings is rotating the forearms one way or the other. Most people don't realize you don't have to rotate your forearms or hands at all in the golf swing, in fact it's better if you don't. The arms can stay just as square as they are at address. The arms follow the rotation of the shoulders on the plane. The arms slightly trail the body on the through swing, creating some additional lag to hip lag, and then eventually they pass the body much later. The club face can stay as square as it was at impact the whole time, many PGA  pros do this. Hunter Mahan is a good example. The only movement the arms really have to make is an up and down one. There is a popular drill where students are told to pick the club straight up from address, hinge it, and rest it on their right shoulder (for righties), and then turn the shoulders 90 degrees and voila, the top of the backswing. To get to this position people will do all kinds of arm and hand contortions all over the place, which is fine. The only problem is, is on the way down, you don't want to be doing these things, and the law of physics states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so you will likely do going down what you did going up, just in reverse. All you really have to do is rotate your shoulders and let the arms stay connected as they were at address, after all this is why you've spent so much time working on the set up position! The swing is a moving and rotating set up position. Some people actually get to the top perfectly, but then insist on going way beyond parallel, ruining the glorious work! The problem here is, the more your arms lift past your shoulders, the more you have to wait for them to come down, for that huge 1mph arm swing speed boost.  You're of course thinking, why the heck do people do all these things? One reason people do this is because it feels natural, at least that's the reason experienced golfers do it. It feels more repeatable to them, and they like it, it feels good. Power to them. But there are plenty of golfers who do these things that aren't happy with their game, so why do they do it? They do these things because it feels like they can get maximum strength this way. Doing it the efficient way would cost them a lot of power, because their strongest and biggest muscles have not coordinated yet to hit a golf ball. When we do basic things like jumping and lifting, things we've done all our lives, we use the most efficient muscles and most supported ones. But when we have to hit a golf ball, those muscles don't know how to get involved, so we use the smaller, weaker, faster ones, to get the job done with some short term speed. The truth is, we can hit the ball a lot further using the right muscles, but many golfers believe they are hitting it better with whatever move they currently have. They aren't wrong, at the moment they can't hit it with the right muscles, because the right muscles aren't trained. But if they stopped what they are doing and started training the right muscles to support the swing, would they hit it better, faster farther? You bet your ball washer they would. So put down the club, put your arms across your chest like you learned at your very first golf clinic, dig into your hip sockets, and rotate those shoulders. Do away with the crazy arm motions and the bending and unbending at the waist. The 4some behind you will thank you for it.
    • Anybody play golf without keeping score on a regular basis?
      Certainly. Only keep a record of pars in my notebook - nothing else, consequently my index could be anywhere between 16 and 36. Aim is to par every hole on the course at some stage.
    • My Swing (coop6)
      The video you linked of Rory do you see how there is zero club face rotation after the ball?
    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      thanks @ColinL great answer. Question: Are there any times where you can take an unplayable if you can't identify your ball, like if you can't get close enough to read the letters. I thought there were.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries