Jump to content
IGNORED

Putting Out or "Gimme Some Lovin'"


dfreuter415
Note: This thread is 3964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by turtleback

You DO have a score for handicap purposes.  This would fall under the heading of an unfinished  hole, about which the Handicap Manual has this to say:

Originally Posted by MS256

No. As a matter of fact I DON'T have a score for handicap purposes because I don't have a handicap. The only reason I have the <7 listed as a handicap is that I was informed that the site requires an estimate if we don't have a handicap.

No, he doesn't mean to say that you have a handicap.  He was directly responding to your post that sounded like you were under the belief that any round with gimmes in it was not a "postable" round.  He's telling you that that is not correct.  If you kept a handicap, playing a round with a few gimmes here and there doesn't by itself eliminate that score from being for handicap purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

No, he doesn't mean to say that you have a handicap.  He was directly responding to your post that sounded like you were under the belief that any round with gimmes in it was not a "postable" round.  He's telling you that that is not correct.  If you kept a handicap, playing a round with a few gimmes here and there doesn't by itself eliminate that score from being for handicap purposes.

I never mentioned a "postable round". There's a difference between what you can post for handicap purposes and what your score is by the rules of golf.

I play by the rules of whatever money game I'm in but it they play "in the leather" which some do I don't have a "score", except for the purposes of that game, because I didn't play by the rules of golf and there's no telling whether I would have missed a short putt or not (or how many). I've seen a lot of putts in the leather that were certainly no gimme and I'm certainly not going to putt it out with money on the line if everybody else is picking them up.

If somebody were to ask what I shot I would tell them I didn't have a score because we played in the leather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by MS256

No. As a matter of fact I DON'T have a score for handicap purposes because I don't have a handicap. The only reason I have the <7 listed as a handicap is that I was informed that the site requires an estimate if we don't have a handicap.


Then my comment does not apply to you.  But it corrects a mis-impression that people who do post their scores might have gotten from your post.  It's all good.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by MS256

I never mentioned a "postable round". There's a difference between what you can post for handicap purposes and what your score is by the rules of golf.

I play by the rules of whatever money game I'm in but it they play "in the leather" which some do I don't have a "score", except for the purposes of that game, because I didn't play by the rules of golf and there's no telling whether I would have missed a short putt or not (or how many). I've seen a lot of putts in the leather that were certainly no gimme and I'm certainly not going to putt it out with money on the line if everybody else is picking them up.

If somebody were to ask what I shot I would tell them I didn't have a score because we played in the leather.

You would really say that??? Seems like an awkward way to answer the question.

You wouldn't say, for example, I shot a 76 but we weren't putting out? You must have to do a lot of explaining on those days.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

You would really say that??? Seems like an awkward way to answer the question.

You wouldn't say, for example, I shot a 76 but we weren't putting out? You must have to do a lot of explaining on those days.

1. "Didn't keep score" is good enough...If anybody asked...Which they don't.

2. I really can't even remember the last time (if ever) a person asked me what score I shot after one of those "in the leather" games. My wife always asks how I played and I either say "Good", "Like crap",  "I won" or "I lost".

To ask what I shot a person would have to know I played in one of those games, not know that we didn't play by the rules in that game, and care enough to ask. Those three things evidently never come together.

P.S. I also can't remember the last time I asked somebody what they shot (probably never), or at least long enough ago that I didn't yet know that their answer probably doesn't mean squat.

I just remembered the last time a person asked me what I shot in a round. He was a non-golfer that I worked with. When I made the mistake of giving him my answer (in an actual round) I had to spend the next 5 minutes explaining to him that the scores we shoot don't relate in any way to the scores the pros shoot, and it's like the difference between hitting a home run in a Little League game and a Major League game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3964 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 135: 5/10/24 Putting and chipping practice. Good session putting through 50 mm gates.
    • Why should SuperSpeed get 3x of Stack's profits? I get the part about SuperSpeed wanting damages sustained as a result of Stack, but I don't get why SuperSpeed feels that they're entitled to both Stack's profits and damages.   Does anyone know/think SuperSpeed actually has a case here?
    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...