Jump to content
IGNORED

Laptop vs. Desktop computers


youngskip40
Note: This thread is 5056 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Anybody know which will typically have a longer life, a Desktop or a Laptop computer?

I've owned two Mac notebooks (a PowerBook and a Macbook Pro) in the last 8 years, both of them lasting about 4 years before starting to experience very significant performance deterioration and some general problems.

I've never compared against a Desktop computer but I'm curious if one or the other will typically perform better for longer.
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, this is a very broad and wide-ranging question. There are many types of laptops (netbooks, ultra portables, thin and lights, midsize, desktop replacements) and even some different type of desktops (all-in-ones, slimlines, mini-tower, mid-tower, full-tower). The form factors of these have a lot to do with how they are designed/engineered, and ultimately how long they last to the end-user.

In general, most people want laptops they can lug around with them somewhere, so most people end up being somewhere between a midsized laptop and an ultra-portable. These smaller form-factor portable laptops try and cram in as many components into a small space, while still trying to keep performance high. The more powerful these laptops are in more confined spaces, the more heat they tend to generate which at some point will wear down the components inside. For this general reason, a mid-to-full sized desktop will tend to last longer because it has a much more liberal use of space to allow for proper ventilation and heat dissipation.

The other reason why desktops have a longer life, is because they are made to have replaceable and swappable parts. Up until the past couple years, laptops were not intended to have the internal hard drive replaced, only the RAM. You still really don't have the option of upgrading the CPU or the GPU down the road. But on desktops you can virtually replace any broken part yourself and upgrade parts as needed or desired. This, of course, assumes you have the knowhow to do it. If you don't have the knowhow, make sure you buy from an OEM brand like Apple or Dell and have good customer support or warranty coverage.

I would personally go with a desktop for all of the aforementioned reasons. As long as I don't have a need to move it around, I will always have a desktop as my main computer. I have a notebook for the living room that I use to access files from my desktop as needed, but if the laptop died tomorrow (which it appears ready to do after about 4 years) it wouldn't cause me any heartache, as everything is on the desktop and backed up weekly.

Brandon

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My desktop Power Mac G4 actually just died a few days ago, 11 years later. I would venture to guess desktops last longer. More space, the chipsets are larger, better and larger fans, NO BATTERY, no screen, keyboard, or mouse to break... But that's just off the top of my head. I could be wrong.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Brandon pretty much nailed it. Laptops are nearly impossible to upgrade, except memory and disk. You are pretty much stuck with the technology that was built in. That's not to say it won't last longer than a desktop, but as applications become more CPU and graphics intensive the older device won't be able to keep up. A modest desktop will also be about half the cost of the laptop. Just one other point, stay away from Celeron processors. Although they make for a very inexpensive computer, it doesn't take much to slow one down.

Eclipse Stand Bag
Big Bertha 2007 460 11°
Big Bertha 2007 3w 16°
Big Bertha 2007 7w 22°
C9 475 2h 18° Insight XTD 5i-SW White Hot XG #7--------------------------------http://www.linkedin.com/in/normh3

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Desktops aren't lugged around, either - desktops just sit there.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Seems to be a consensus growing, and I agree. Desktops will almost surely far outlast laptops, both in terms of wear and tear and performance, although for most practical purposes any more it'll be the wear and tear that forces either of them to be replaced most likely. At the same price point, you'll get more horsepower out of a desktop since they don't have to provide a battery and can use fewer custom components.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5056 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...