Jump to content
IGNORED

Scotty Cameron - Why so popular?


kregan
Note: This thread is 5961 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

So I am scanning Ebay for putters.... I am bored, and I notice
that anything Scotty Cameron seems real popular?

What's it all about?

Kelly


www.finescale360.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's definitely at least partly a status thing and people associate them with an elite level of play, but they are also just solid sticks that have for the most part held up well over a long period of time.
"The general knowledge in the United States about Australia is low. Everybody thinks we ride kangaroos to school. You don't ever take a kangaroo to school. You take them to the supermarket because you can put groceries in the pouch. "

- Stuart Appleby


In The Bag:Driver - 9.5° XTD Pro Graphite...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love my Newport 2, Scotty Cameron putter, I love the weight, the feel and the look, The detailing, workmanship and the putter head is made from a solid billet of German stainless steel. I played my three best rounds of golf with this putter. I also own 8 other putters but always come back to the Newport 2. I bought mine on ebay for about $150 including shipping about two years ago.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


they're freakin awesome that's why.

In my wasabe green ozone bag:

Hibore 9.5° w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft Driver

G10 15° 1H w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft G10 18° 2H w/ UST V2 Stiff Shaft T-Zoid Pro 3-PW S300 CG10 52° 2 Dot Black Pearl CG10 56° 2 Dot Black Pearl Newport 2 TerylliumLow Score = 88

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love my Newport 2, Scotty Cameron putter, I love the weight, the feel and the look, The detailing, workmanship and the putter head is made from a solid billet of German stainless steel. I played my three best rounds of golf with this putter. I also own 8 other putters but always come back to the Newport 2. I bought mine on ebay for about $150 including shipping about two years ago.

ks8829,

If you bought a milled GSS Cameron off e-Bay for $150 you made out with the deal of the century. The cheapest GSS Cameron I have bought went for $1800. There are no retail putters made from a block of GSS, only milled inserts in the Studio Style and Red X series. Herein lies the genius of Scotty Cameron - marketing. Getting people to buy into an image and idea all enhanced by things like letter openers, divot tools, and dancing head covers. It's a pretty good racket, and with some help with his buddy Vog he's created quite a secondary collector's market for himself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I just recently started collecting Scotty Cameron putters and I have tried to learn as much as I can about them. Here are a few of my humble observations as to why they are so popular:

1. SC putters are made to the highest quality standards;
2. Many tour players use SC putters;
3. They look and perform incredibly;
4. Finally...marketing, marketing, marketing. Scotty Cameron can put his name on just about anything and it will sell for a lot of money.

909D-Comp
909F-2
585H Hybrids
755 Irons
Vokey Wedges 2-Ball F7 B330S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I may get bashed among you SC fans here, but I am wondering how the Ping Redwood series compare to the Scotty's? I tried a Redwood Anser the other day and it's a sweet looking putter and seems to be very well constructed.

Driver: 454 Comp 10.5* Stiff
3-Wood: Warbird Strong 3 Stiff
Irons: I10, 3-PW, white dot, stiff
Wedges: Tour-W 54/14 and 60/10
Putter: Anser 2Ball: Pro-V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I may get bashed among you SC fans here, but I am wondering how the Ping Redwood series compare to the Scotty's? I tried a Redwood Anser the other day and it's a sweet looking putter and seems to be very well constructed.

Just goes back to name brand, like watches there are so many different brands yet most people still think Rolex is the best....does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I say this as an owner of a couple of Scotty Cameron putters, the popularity of SC putters comes down to two things, marketing and having the number one player in the world using you putter, and of course marketing that fact. I had my first SC long before Tiger made them collectible.

True, the putters are well made and finished, but then so are many other high line putters on the market. But here is the thing, all of the sought after collectible Scotty Cameron designs are copies of classic designs over the last 50 years (Ping Anser, Wilson 8802, Macgregor IMG6, Bullseye, Zebra, etc.) I have owned or have played with each of these classic putters in mint condition and depending upon the vintage, the workmanship rivals what Scotty is currently producing. These were forged and ground (not the Ping of course), many times by hand, and finished with decorative leather wrap grips. Their modern counterparts are often cast or milled because it is less expensive to produce a machine made putter than one made by hand. Often weighing more than the copy, these putters provided excellent feel, which is why they are still sought today.

I find the another aspect of the Scotty Cameron phenomenon interesting as well. Though his classic reproductions are extremely popular and sought by collectors, his own original designs like the Detour and Futura are not.

His green repair tool was genius though.

Irons: Staff 1987 or 1967 Dyna-Power
Driver: R580
3W: Burner Bubble
5W: Quad Pro
Hybrid: Halo 3iPutter: 1955 M2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I didn't know Tiger used one, that explains most of it!

I have not purchased a putter yet, I have an old Ping B60
that my dad used (he past in July at 92). I figured I would
use that for a while, he would have liked that.

Kelly


www.finescale360.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's all marketing!

sure they look great but there are lots of lovely looking putters out there.

they roll it nicely but what about YES!, Ping, Rossa, Odyssey etc?

i owned a Newport 1 for 18 months - i now have a putter which cost 1/3 of that, looks beautiful and rolls it just as well.

Ping Redwood are stunning looking rydaddy, im considering looking at them when i sort my putting woes out! I dont think i'd go with SC again - just a personal thing, i feel less confident with them!

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's all marketing!

I agree that marketing has a lot to do with the success of Cameron products, but that doesn't quite explain why so many tour professionals use his products. There is obviously something more than just a name on these clubs.

Now I am not a diehard Scotty Cameron fanboy, I definately won't pay hundreds of dollars for a head-cover and I don't plan on buying a Tour putter for many thousands of dollars, but I love the OTR putters. I would like to get a Ping Anser Redwood to add to my collection as well as a Taylor Made Imola Classic, Odyssey Black Series Blade and a Bettinardi Blade.

909D-Comp
909F-2
585H Hybrids
755 Irons
Vokey Wedges 2-Ball F7 B330S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree that marketing has a lot to do with the success of Cameron products, but that doesn't quite explain why so many tour professionals use his products. There is obviously something more than just a name on these clubs.

blkdiamond,

The answer lies in the all might dollar - Titleist pays for each Cameron putter a tour pro puts into play. Throw in an all expenses paid trip to San Diego to visit Scotty and the studio and a putter hand made to your specs and desires and you can begin to see why he dominates tour counts. His off the rack putters bear no similarities to the ones hand made for tour pros. Take a look around Cameron Collector and you'll see some pretty big differences between circle T's and retail models.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


His off the rack putters bear no similarities to the ones hand made for tour pros. Take a look around Cameron Collector and you'll see some pretty big differences between circle T's and retail models.

Actually there isn't a huge difference between the OTR and the Made for tour models except that the Made for Tour models are custom fit, they tend to be "hand-stamped", and there is much tighter quality-control. Many threads on the Cameron Collector (which I am a member of) will verify this. I have found that what will add value to a SC putter is the stampings (Circle-T, rare hand stamps, etc.)

The answer lies in the all might dollar - Titleist pays for each Cameron putter a tour pro puts into play. Throw in an all expenses paid trip to San Diego to visit Scotty and the studio and a putter hand made to your specs and desires and you can begin to see why he dominates tour counts.

I agree with this, to a point, but I imagine the other club manufacturers would offer a similar service to other pros as well. Also, why would so many players use a club that doesn't perform up to their standards, especially one as important as a putter (IMHO the most important club in your bag)?

Just my $.02

909D-Comp
909F-2
585H Hybrids
755 Irons
Vokey Wedges 2-Ball F7 B330S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Actually there isn't a huge difference between the OTR and the Made for tour models except that the Made for Tour models are custom fit, they tend to be "hand-stamped", and there is much tighter quality-control. Many threads on the Cameron Collector (which I am a member of) will verify this. I have found that what will add value to a SC putter is the stampings (Circle-T, rare hand stamps, etc.)

blkdiamond,

There are some pretty major differences in head shape and design in the Tour 009's and Newports. Different neck styles, hand welded necks, hand ground soles, truly milled putters (versus forged and skim milled for retail), different metals are all just a starting point. Note the welded neck on this 009 Tour model, not something you're going to find on any retail anywhere in the world. If you don't think it makes any difference, why would they spend hours hand welding and grinding necks for Tour players?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


blkdiamond,

that does look beautiful...

Launcher 460 10.5° <BB Solution 130 R>
Wishon 949MC 16.5° <SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 R>
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23° <UST SR2 R>
MX-23 5-PW <KBS Tour R>
Vokey 250.08, SM54.10, SM58.08 <DG Wedge> Callie 33.75"TLT Series 4MOI matched

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5961 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...