Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1192 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been Playing Golf for: 7 years

My current handicap index or average score is: 85

My typical ball flight is: A little high with all of my shots.  I ALWAYS miss with my driver to the right. 
 

The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: Just trying to gain more distance. I can usually hit the ball pretty solid, however I really lacking distance.  I usually hit my my driver about 220.  My 9-iron usually only goes about 120-130.  The DTL video is with a pitching wedge.  The FO swing is with a 9-iron. 


Videos: 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm not an instructor, and I certainly don't have the game of golf down to a science. But it looks to me like your hip turn could stand to be increased You have a lot more arms, then shoulders, then hips.....this could be the cause of you lacking distance. But I'd wait for someone more knowledgeable to weigh in before you start making changes 🙂 


Posted
33 minutes ago, JeepXJ98 said:

I'm not an instructor, and I certainly don't have the game of golf down to a science. But it looks to me like your hip turn could stand to be increased You have a lot more arms, then shoulders, then hips.....this could be the cause of you lacking distance. But I'd wait for someone more knowledgeable to weigh in before you start making changes 🙂 

Thanks for the reply. So you’re saying that I need more hip turn in the backswing or the downswing? 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Golfer20 said:

Thanks for the reply. So you’re saying that I need more hip turn in the backswing or the downswing? 

 To my untrained eye, yes. Your hip turn in the backswing seems to be a little lacking. More hip turn on the backswing will automatically lead to more in the downswing as you bring them back forward. And that should equate to more power. Right now it looks like a lot of your power is coming from your arms. This, I believe, would also contribute to your high ball flight as you're 'lifting' while coming through the ball.

Edited by JeepXJ98

  • Administrator
Posted

Have you tried… swinging faster?

Not being facetious.

Also, try this.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 minutes ago, iacas said:

Have you tried… swinging faster?

Not being facetious.

Also, try this.

I can see where youre coming from. It does look like I’m swinging pretty slow. I guess I have been focused on positions so much here lately, I have forgotten to swing fast! I know you say most of the speed comes from the arms Iacas... I remember seeing a post about that in the Swing Thoughts forum. 

 

Thanks for the reply. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Swing just looks a little bit cautious, if there is any way to use an impact bag to improve your feel, that may help. Another drill is flip the club around and swing, listening for the loudest swish. You want the loudest swish to be when you get the club into the ball. 

Various exercises to improve club speed can workout too.


  • 3 years later...
Posted

I recently joined Evolvr after spinning my wheels the past couple of years and thought I'd share what I am working on with my instructor.  We first worked on improving my grip to make it more in my fingers.  Also, we worked on getting my stance more in the balls of my feet instead of sitting back on my heels.  Here's what my stance looked like before the change:

Here's what it looks like after the change:

 

It's amazing how much improving my grip and stance has already improved my ball striking.  I just feel like I am in a better position to attack the ball. 

From there we started working on my weight shift.  The swing below is too rotational and not enough movement forward:

This is a harder change to make but I have been working on it the past couple of weeks and here's what it currently looks like:

I am excited about the changes that I have made so far, and I am looking forward to continuing to improve. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not to step on some toes here. 

With your 5 iron, just to continue on the set up, might want to make sure the ball isn't too far back in your stance. I would say it need to be at least two ball widths further forward in the stance for a 5 iron. This might help with the weight shift, as you have to get forward to hit the ball. When the ball is back, it is easy for the body to hang back. 

Same Maybe with the 8 iron, ball is still too far back, the stance is a bit narrow for an 8 iron. If you take that stance for the 8 iron, then just shift your back foot further away to take a slightly wider stance. Like, the position of the outside of your foot should be closer to where the inside of your foot should be.Maybe it is different for you. For me, that ball position might be where I put a full swing lob wedge or sand wedge. 

Yea, you definitely changed the image of your swing in that last video, versus the 5 iron video. Good progress! 👍

  • Thumbs Up 2

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Not to step on some toes here. 

With your 5 iron, just to continue on the set up, might want to make sure the ball isn't too far back in your stance. I would say it need to be at least two ball widths further forward in the stance for a 5 iron. This might help with the weight shift, as you have to get forward to hit the ball. When the ball is back, it is easy for the body to hang back. 

Same Maybe with the 8 iron, ball is still too far back, the stance is a bit narrow for an 8 iron. If you take that stance for the 8 iron, then just shift your back foot further away to take a slightly wider stance. Like, the position of the outside of your foot should be closer to where the inside of your foot should be.Maybe it is different for you. For me, that ball position might be where I put a full swing lob wedge or sand wedge. 

Yea, you definitely changed the image of your swing in that last video, versus the 5 iron video. Good progress! 👍

Thanks for pointing that out.  They did mention my ball position being a touch too far back for both swings.  I guess I was just consumed with getting that weight shift and getting on the balls of my feet for my stance.  I'll pay more attention to my ball position in the next videos. 

Thanks 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Golfer20 said:

Thanks for pointing that out.  They did mention my ball position being a touch too far back for both swings.  I guess I was just consumed with getting that weight shift and getting on the balls of my feet for my stance.  I'll pay more attention to my ball position in the next videos. 

Thanks 

I recommend setting up a hitting station, with an alignment stick (like you have in your video), just to keep ball position consistent. It gets tricky with hitting irons because you fat one shot and you have to move everything like 2-3" back 😉

I am not a fan of hitting off mats, but they are pretty good for practicing ball position. 

Another tip I recommend, is how you set up to the ball. Even for practice, set up to the ball like you would a normal shot. If you do that routine, with something like an alignment stick for reference, you'll train yourself really quickly what good ball position is. Even if you are working on something else. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/26/2022 at 4:46 PM, saevel25 said:

Another tip I recommend, is how you set up to the ball. Even for practice, set up to the ball like you would a normal shot. If you do that routine, with something like an alignment stick for reference, you'll train yourself really quickly what good ball position is. Even if you are working on something else. 

Good point.  I believe I am going to have to keep that alignment stick down to confirm the correct ball position.  Also, it'll serve another purpose to of making sure my camera angles are correct.  

Thanks

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

The past couple of months I have been working on my weight shift and getting to my left side.  I believe it's finally getting engrained, especially when you compare it to the five-iron swing above.  The swing below is from the course, which is good because I know I can carry it from the range to the course.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Continuing to work on the weight shift piece.  My playing partner was able to get a pretty cool rear view of my swing from the course:

 

 

You can certainly see the weight shift from this angle!  I like how things are progressing so far... 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Really excellent! Now fix the flip and you'll play off a 5 :-)

  • Like 1

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

These past couple of months I have been continuing the weight shift piece where I "fall forward" on the down swing.  I think this will always be something that I have to work on and check from time to time along with my grip and stance.

Recently on Evolvr, I have been instructed to do what's called a "twist & roll" where I bow or arch the wrist on the downswing.  This is another way to square the face that helps to prevent my right hand from throwing in the downswing to square the face which sometimes leads to fat shots for me.  Doing this has also helped me with how my impact position looks:

Before:

image.png.c8e6e5516bde46d9ef341ed503bb4e82.png

After:

image.png.7d0b4abe3992b88d09a31f307a710e49.png

 

I am now struggling with thin shots, which may be from me not doing enough weight shift forward, but I am sure I'll be able to clean up this up through Evolvr.  It's nice to have a good looking impact position for once. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Impressive shift! Not enough info to have an opinion on the connection to thin shots, but agreed you could get your weight a bit more forward. Maybe hips forward a bit more? Def head not leaning back over the rear foot as much at impact.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 hours ago, mdl said:

Def head not leaning back over the rear foot as much at impact.

Yes. The fall is with most of the body.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1192 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.