Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1706 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

I disagree about it being a training issue. You see examples all the time of white offenders who have shot and killed people taken into custody without any use of force at all.

Still reeks of lack of training. You can't be comfortable with a situation unless you train for it. Someone who pulls their gun in this situation clearly lacks the experience to make the correct decision. 

4 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

I will say that a part of the problem is there are a lot of calls police answer that they have no business dealing with and don’t have the training to deal with. That’s an entire different subject.

I agree. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

George Floyd wasn’t shot. Eric Garner wasn’t shot. So the same police that didn’t react with force when armed white people protested outside their capital lost that training when it came to George? Or were those cops off that day when he got murdered? How about the other 3 officers that did absolutely nothing to stop their co defendant? None had training. If the police treated everybody like they would want their child or spouse to be treated all of this would go away. That has zero to do with training. 


Posted
1 minute ago, mclaren4life said:

George Floyd wasn’t shot. Eric Garner wasn’t shot. So the same police that didn’t react with force when armed white people protested outside their capital lost that training when it came to George?

No, the police knew George and probably did this premeditated. This case is unique in that regard. There are videos of police using that choke hold / maneuver on white people as well, with deadly consequences. By all regards, the policeman who used this choke hold did so with violation of written regulation on when it should be used. If they were even properly trained on when to use it. I feel like cops are given a patchwork of techniques that they hardly practice when to and how to use it. 

2 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

How about the other 3 officers that did absolutely nothing to stop their co defendant?

Two of the cops were brand new to the force and were with a person who has been a policeman for over 10 years. Sorry to say, it probably would be career suicide to stand up to a cop with that many more years of service. It's not the right thing to do, but it's a very human thing that happens.   Especially when you hear stories about how police department culture can be. They would be branded snitches. Their lives would be hell for their career.

Don't get me wrong, I wish they had the courage to stand up to policeman using the choke hold on George. I can understand their position and they're apprehension to not stepping in.

Now, the third cop, who stood by and actually try to stop people from filming, should be hit with higher chargers than the two new police officers. 

5 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

None had training.

It should be training. It should be training that new police should know they can stand up and report on incidents like these. 

6 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

If the police treated everybody like they would want their child or spouse to be treated all of this would go away. That has zero to do with training. 

I get you want people to magically have this thought, "Just treat them like family." But, that is a pipe dream that will never come true. Humans will forever treat people they don't know not as family. Still, you can treat someone with dignity and respect and still care for you family more. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So is it training to deal with POC or all people because they don’t kill white people as often as they do POC. Or do the white police officers know every single white person in the area they police so they some how don’t end up killing them? 


  • Administrator
Posted
4 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

So is it training to deal with POC or all people because they don’t kill white people as often as they do POC. Or do the white police officers know every single white person in the area they police so they some how don’t end up killing them? 

Let's be clear about something: white people are killed by police officers, too:

585152-blank-355.png

Sadly, the trend of fatal police shootings in the United States seems to only be increasing, with a total 506 civilians having been shot, 105 of whom were Black, as of June 30, 2020.

That's not what this is about, because things can be seen (and often are) disproportionate. Which you hint at, but somewhat poorly IMO.

I think training can be important. Let's train police officers to de-escalate instead of escalating. To realize when a suspect is rendered unable to resist and to get up off his neck. To let junior officers do what is right without the macho bullshit culture. Things like that can all be trained.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

No, the police knew George and probably did this premeditated. This case is unique in that regard. There are videos of police using that choke hold / maneuver on white people as well, with deadly consequences. By all regards, the policeman who used this choke hold did so with violation of written regulation on when it should be used. If they were even properly trained on when to use it. I feel like cops are given a patchwork of techniques that they hardly practice when to and how to use it. 

Two of the cops were brand new to the force and were with a person who has been a policeman for over 10 years. Sorry to say, it probably would be career suicide to stand up to a cop with that many more years of service. It's not the right thing to do, but it's a very human thing that happens.   Especially when you hear stories about how police department culture can be. They would be branded snitches. Their lives would be hell for their career.

Don't get me wrong, I wish they had the courage to stand up to policeman using the choke hold on George. I can understand their position and they're apprehension to not stepping in.

Now, the third cop, who stood by and actually try to stop people from filming, should be hit with higher chargers than the two new police officers. 

It should be training. It should be training that new police should know they can stand up and report on incidents like these. 

I get you want people to magically have this thought, "Just treat them like family." But, that is a pipe dream that will never come true. Humans will forever treat people they don't know not as family. Still, you can treat someone with dignity and respect and still care for you family more. 

 

I agree; however, proper chokes can be accomplished.  Practicing BJJ folks do them often.  This goes back to your training argument.  Nonetheless, obviously we'd like to see it not have to get to that point to begin with--de-escalation techniques.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
  • Administrator
Posted
dcovwendellhaskins_hz2.jpg

The PGA of America hired Wendell Haskins to make golf "a game for all." He never had a chance.

Also, I re-titled the topic.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
  • Administrator
Posted
29-breonna-cover-videoSixteenByNineJumbo

None of the police officers who raided Breonna Taylor’s home wore body cameras, impeding the public from a full understanding of what happened. The Times’s visual investigation team built a 3-D model of...

It's an 18-minute video I'd encourage people to watch.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, iacas said:
29-breonna-cover-videoSixteenByNineJumbo

None of the police officers who raided Breonna Taylor’s home wore body cameras...

It's an 18-minute video I'd encourage people to watch.

If the recreation is accurate, then that’s very sad. However, it’s difficult to pierce the police’s qualified immunity. The case didn’t even make it past the grand jury to even consider that point.  Moreover, prosecutors have a lot of discretion.
 

It’s a tough situation with no clear answers unfortunately. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
12 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

The case didn’t even make it past the grand jury…

Sure, but why?

It's the NYT, and though they'll slant one direction politically, this felt pretty reasonably accurate. One shot was fired versus 32, ten of them without any sort of clear target and without any return fire of any sort? (Granted, the ten shots fired by the other guy didn't hit anyone, but they entered other apartments and he could have killed the sister, the nephew or whatever the other kid was, etc.).

So why didn't it make it past the grand jury? Do we as a society generally do too much to "protect" the police and pierce their immunity shield?

I think we often do. I think we often assume that police are infallible or something.

I think it's damning when 12 people say the police didn't identify themselves, to the point that they didn't even know that police were there.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, iacas said:

Sure, but why?

Because the grand jury did not choose to indict.

 

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

So why didn't it make it past the grand jury?

I answered above.

 

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

Do we as a society generally do too much to "protect" the police and pierce their immunity shield?

Maybe, but what does qualified immunity have to do with this case?  As stated, the case didn't even make it past the grand jury hearing, so the discussion of immunity is moot.

 

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think we often do.

Perhaps.  There are good arguments on both sides, but I tend to agree with you.

 

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think we often assume that police are infallible or something.

That's not the reason for qualified immunity.  Read some law review articles on the pros and cons and rationale of the immunity doctrine.  

 

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think it's damning when 12 people say the police didn't identify themselves

Since when is following the law "damning?"  Prior to this case, "no knock" warrants were legal police procedure in KY.  Nonetheless, even this NYT video indicates that despite the legality of no knock warrants, the police did identify themselves.

Edited by ncates00
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Actually the police said they identified themselves. The video is just telling what they said. Also they were supposed to be serving a knock and announce. 


Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

they were supposed to be serving a knock and announce. 

First, if you want to discuss reply to someone, please use the @ to tag a person or quote them.

False.  No knock warrants were valid under KY law prior to this case and the subsequent new law banning no knock warrants.

Moreover, no knock warrants, like all warrants, must be obtained from a judge.

Edited by ncates00
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, mclaren4life said:

Never commented on the legality of no knocks. 

 

8 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

Also they were supposed to be serving a knock and announce. 

Then why say this?  🤦‍♂️

4 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

I dont need you to tell me how to post.

Apparently you do because 178 posts in on this forum, and you have forgotten how to use the @ symbol.  🙂 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, ncates00 said: 

Since when is following the law "damning?"  Prior to this case, "no knock" warrants were legal police procedure in KY.  Nonetheless, even this NYT video indicates that despite the legality of no knock warrants, the police did identify themselves.

I posted because you took a stance that the 12 witnesses were incorrect because they were legally allowed to serve a no knock which is not what they were supposed to be doing. Make sense now?


Posted
Just now, mclaren4life said:

I posted because you took a stance that the 12 witnesses were incorrect because they were legally allowed to serve a no knock which is not what they were supposed to be doing. Make sense now?

No it doesn’t make sense. Who cares what the witnesses say if the law holds that no knock warrants are legally permissible. The whole point about what the witnesses say does not matter one iota in this case. However, because of Breonna’s Law, which bans no knock warrants moving forward, in future cases such testimony would matter. Both you and Erik are discussing a point that does not matter in this case; that’s why I called you both out on it. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I didnt forget just didnt use it. Dont believe there is anything requiring me to use it. What they say matters because once again, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE SERVING A KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE. That means they knock on the door then announce who they are. So maybe instead of calling people out you actually take a second to read peoples posts and try and understand as opposed to instructing me how to post. 


Note: This thread is 1706 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.