Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1853 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If I'm not mistaken, putter shaft length is measured along the shaft down an imaginary line to where it would intersect with the sole. The shaft of a toe hang putter that has a hosel (plumber's/flare/slant neck) points more toward the heel. The shaft of a face balanced putter points to the middle of the face where the center of gravity typically is. So for a face balanced putter shaft length is typically measured from the middle of the face putting you closer to the ball whereas for toe hang putters it's measured from closer to the heel, placing you farther from the ball. Or do manufacturers compensate for this somehow?

The height of the grip end (distance between it and the ground) given the same shaft length I don't think changes noticeably between the two putter types because as the bend that creates the lie angle in a (double bend) shaft is raised up from the clubhead compared to where the kink is in a slant/plumbers neck hosel putter, creating a longer vertical section, the shaft measures longer by roughly the same amount because 70 degrees (the angle with which it the shaft points to the middle of the sole) isn't far from vertical, maths wise.

Question:
I have to position my eyes well inside the ball in order to see line correctly. If you want to maintain the same distance from the ball and replace a toe hang putter with a face balanced (double bend) one, would the latter require a flatter lie specification?

Edited by Roenie

Posted (edited)

Here's an image to clarify my point:
(Couldn't edit the above post anymore.)

image.png

If you have to flatten the lie of the club on the right to get the same distance from the ball as the one on the left, the shaft will of course be pointing beyond the middle/CG and face balanced becomes slightly toe up balanced...    (only adding shaft length would raise the hand position and affect posture)

Edited by Roenie

Posted

Okay, I'll take a stab at this. 
I THINK what you are getting at is that when you flatten the putter it changes where the shaft "points". Which is true. 

However, I also THINK that will not change whether the putter is face balanced or toe balanced. For two reasons.


1 - The fulcrum doesn't change. The shaft still connects to the head in the same place. The head weight doesn't change. Some putters have adjustable weights for this very reason. 

2 - Normally you don't adjust the lie angle of the putter very much anyway. You get a shorter or longer putter, perhaps just tweaking the lie angle. 

 

That's my thoughts. I'm no Alfred Einstein. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
6 hours ago, Roenie said:

If I'm not mistaken, putter shaft length is measured along the shaft down an imaginary line to where it would intersect with the sole. The shaft of a toe hang putter that has a hosel (plumber's/flare/slant neck) points more toward the heel. The shaft of a face balanced putter points to the middle of the face where the center of gravity typically is. So for a face balanced putter shaft length is typically measured from the middle of the face putting you closer to the ball whereas for toe hang putters it's measured from closer to the heel, placing you farther from the ball. Or do manufacturers compensate for this somehow?

The height of the grip end (distance between it and the ground) given the same shaft length I don't think changes noticeably between the two putter types because as the bend that creates the lie angle in a (double bend) shaft is raised up from the clubhead compared to where the kink is in a slant/plumbers neck hosel putter, creating a longer vertical section, the shaft measures longer by roughly the same amount because 70 degrees (the angle with which it the shaft points to the middle of the sole) isn't far from vertical, maths wise.

Question:
I have to position my eyes well inside the ball in order to see line correctly. If you want to maintain the same distance from the ball and replace a toe hang putter with a face balanced (double bend) one, would the latter require a flatter lie specification?

It shouldn’t change the lie at all. The putting motion is relatively slow, so face balance verses toe hang really doesn’t make that much of a difference. It is more important that you can aim the putter face. This is what’s done in a fitting. FWIW, my eyes are inside and slightly behind the ball. I was fit to a 35.5” putter and the lie was adjusted to 68. I’m a pretty decent putter too.

37 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Okay, I'll take a stab at this. 
I THINK what you are getting at is that when you flatten the putter it changes where the shaft "points". Which is true. 

However, I also THINK that will not change whether the putter is face balanced or toe balanced. For two reasons.


1 - The fulcrum doesn't change. The shaft still connects to the head in the same place. The head weight doesn't change. Some putters have adjustable weights for this very reason. 

2 - Normally you don't adjust the lie angle of the putter very much anyway. You get a shorter or longer putter, perhaps just tweaking the lie angle. 

 

That's my thoughts. I'm no Alfred Einstein. 

Big hitter Einstein.

  • Funny 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I THINK what you are getting at is that when you flatten the putter it changes where the shaft "points". Which is true. 

That's exactly not what I'm getting at. 😄

I believe that red line in the left picture (=toe hang blade putter) is the amount a toe balanced putter puts you closer to the ball because in the right picture (= face balanced mallet) the entire upper section of shaft has shifted toward the middle of the face. So without changing the shaft's actual lie angle, you still end up closer to the ball. The shaft where it leaves the clubhead runs vertical for longer before it starts to bend sideways. On the toe hang putter as shown in the image, that shaft starts to bend sideways much earlier. Which does affect how far you stand from the ball, even if the shaft enters the head at the same point. Geometry Einsteinage yo. He was way ahead of his time with the lockdown hairdo.

6 hours ago, boogielicious said:

It shouldn’t change the lie at all.

That's kinda my point: it changes the distance between clubhead and player without changing the shaft's lie angle. It shifts the whole upper part of the shaft sideways less. Unless of course I've made an error in my thinking or there's something else I don't know about.

6 hours ago, boogielicious said:

The putting motion is relatively slow, so face balance verses toe hang really doesn’t make that much of a difference. It is more important that you can aim the putter face. This is what’s done in a fitting. FWIW, my eyes are inside and slightly behind the ball. I was fit to a 35.5” putter and the lie was adjusted to 68.

Thanks for the advice. How tall are you? Is yours a face balanced putter, and if so, does it now still "face balance" when balanced on a finger horizontally?

Quote

 Normally you don't adjust the lie angle of the putter very much anyway. You get a shorter or longer putter, perhaps just tweaking the lie angle. 

Yeah I think it requires a lie angle decrease plus very small shaft length increase to get it to the same spot as a toe hang putter with the same lie/length spec. However as I mentioned flattening the lie, even a little, would in theory make a face balanced putter no longer face balanced. I've asked a clubfitter to weigh in on this. I'll let you know what he says.

Regards

P.S. my thread opening post originally also included applying the pythagorian theorem, but I found a way to simplify and shorten the explanation. 😄

Edited by Roenie

  • Administrator
Posted

You’re thinking about roughly half an inch quite a bit.

That half inch is quite easily changed with the lie angle too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1853 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • the rules have changed, but this would fall under 11.2 in the current rules.  General Penalty to any player who deliberately deflects a ball in motion, and you must replay the putt.
    • Day 250 4-29 Getting chest through with speed on downswing and wrist arch. Also worked on some moving the pelvis slightly away in the backswing. Feel like im going too fast and long, looks like it on the recordings too.
    • Interesting that it's no penalty, but then again, I can't imagine someone would purposefully put their foot out there in this situation or one like it.  And then there was the time someone purposefully deflected his own ball during a major, but that's very different too. The only time I can recall a ball I hit hitting another player or their equipment was ages ago -- over a decade and a half ago.  I had a 3' putt for an 89 and someone (a random pairing, not someone I knew) decided it was a good time for goaltending practice.  That wouldn't fall under this rule, though (and it wasn't in a tournament anyway). Thanks for continuing to share these, Dave!  I always find these interesting. 
    • Day 51 (29 Apr 26) - Worked with a few of the golf team kids plus my grandson (he’s too young for the team as it’s middle-high school age and he’ll be 10 Sat).  He put on a small hitting clinic (hitting off the same tees as the rest of the boys) - one of the older kids called him a “coach”.  Worked in a few shots for myself - had the light bag: driver, 7w, 4 - 6 - 8 - Pw - Sw (DCI 962’s except the Sw a 981) and Zebra putter….got in some great tee shots, a couple of recovery and an awesome up and down for bogie: 55 yds out, hitting 4th shot due to 2nd getting tangled in limbs - see the window I need to hit for a tight spinner with the Sw - nail it to a postage letter distance from the cup for a tap in bogie….my kind of practice. 
    • Day 21, April 29.  Before going to work this morning, I worked in my indoor practice room for 20 minutes.   This was entirely 6-iron shots with the usual step.  Video yesterday showed me that I'm still straightening my trail leg too much (leading to the backswing length issue I've been working to fix), so I focused on not doing that in my rehearsal swings.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.