Jump to content
IGNORED

What's My Next Shot After This Tee Shot?


xcelrr8
 Share

Recommended Posts

Over the weekend I played Oyster Bay Golf Links and on this hole my tee shot followed one of these two paths.  There was a very strong wind moving the ball to the right so from our point of view it stayed left of the 1st sand trap.  After that we would be guessing as to where it landed and bounced out.  Or if it never landed and just went straight out.  What would be my next shot?  There were no white stakes and I remember the starter saying that most of the course is a lateral drop.  Regardless of what the starter said I still wasn't sure what to do.  Please help for the next time I find myself in this situation.

Cheers  

001.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Welcome to The Sand Trap!  :beer:

Whether its marked or not, any body of water is a Penalty Area, and unless marked with Yellow stakes it is considered a Red Penalty Area.  So you have 3 basic relief options under Rule 17.1d:

Replay the shot from the tee, called Stroke and Distance Relief

Take back on the line relief, keeping the spot where the ball last crossed into the Penalty Area, and going back as far as you like.  Seeing that its entirely marsh, this isn't really available for you.

Take Lateral Relief, drop within two clublengths from the spot where the ball last crossed into the Penalty Area.

And of course you can wade out into the marsh and play the original, so I guess you have four options.  I do remember one big gator at Oyster Bay, I bet he has relatives out in that marsh.  I suggest you read this rule at:

https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=17&subrulenum=1

They have some illustrations for each of the types of Relief available that should make it fairly clear.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Welcome to The Sand Trap!  :beer:

Whether its marked or not, any body of water is a Penalty Area, and unless marked with Yellow stakes it is considered a Red Penalty Area.  So you have 3 basic relief options under Rule 17.1d:

Replay the shot from the tee, called Stroke and Distance Relief

Take back on the line relief, keeping the spot where the ball last crossed into the Penalty Area, and going back as far as you like.  Seeing that its entirely marsh, this isn't really available for you.

Take Lateral Relief, drop within two clublengths from the spot where the ball last crossed into the Penalty Area.

And of course you can wade out into the marsh and play the original, so I guess you have four options.  I do remember one big gator at Oyster Bay, I bet he has relatives out in that marsh.  I suggest you read this rule at:

https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=17&subrulenum=1

They have some illustrations for each of the types of Relief available that should make it fairly clear.

Thanks 

We actually got a picture of the 15' gator chillin on the par three.  After that I was not going anywhere in the marshes or water.  

So it only matters where it last crossed before going into the hazard?  For the imaginary hole below you would take the drop where is splashed in.  And not where it first crossed the water?  So it does matter if the ball crosses back over land even though it never touched it?

 

 

002.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
36 minutes ago, xcelrr8 said:

Thanks 

We actually got a picture of the 15' gator chillin on the par three.  After that I was not going anywhere in the marshes or water.  

So it only matters where it last crossed before going into the hazard?  For the imaginary hole below you would take the drop where is splashed in.  And not where it first crossed the water?  So it does matter if the ball crosses back over land even though it never touched it?

You have it right, its the flight of the ball, not whether it bounced on dry land or not, and its where the ball LAST crossed the edge of the Penalty Area.  

Oh, and that gator has been there by the 16th tee for decades, I think I first played there in the late 1980's, and he was there.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, xcelrr8 said:

Over the weekend I played Oyster Bay Golf Links and on this hole my tee shot followed one of these two paths.  There was a very strong wind moving the ball to the right so from our point of view it stayed left of the 1st sand trap.  After that we would be guessing as to where it landed and bounced out.  Or if it never landed and just went straight out.  What would be my next shot?  There were no white stakes and I remember the starter saying that most of the course is a lateral drop.  Regardless of what the starter said I still wasn't sure what to do.  Please help for the next time I find myself in this situation.

Cheers  

001.jpg

Since you do not know where it crossed into the hazard I think you have only one choice, Stroke & Distance so hitting 3 off the tee.  I'm not a rules master so I am open to being corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, StuM said:

Since you do not know where it crossed into the hazard I think you have only one choice, Stroke & Distance so hitting 3 off the tee.  I'm not a rules master so I am open to being corrected.

I'd say the Rules allow the player to make his best judgement on this, look at 1.3b(2).

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, StuM said:

Since you do not know where it crossed into the hazard I think you have only one choice, Stroke & Distance so hitting 3 off the tee.  I'm not a rules master so I am open to being corrected.

Yeah, no. That only applies if you're not virtually certain it's in the penalty area.

  • Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yeah, no. That only applies if you're not virtually certain it's in the penalty area.

Yeah, wind was coming strong from left to right and once it got above the tree line it moved over the sand trap and towards that single tree.  So my best estimate was somewhere between those two lines.  The group I was with made me re-tee since they were trying to beat me so I did since I didn't know the rule.  Now I know so that won't happen again.  I won anyway so all good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, I'm going to have to go against the consensus here.  Unless you know for virtual certainty that you ball crossed into the penalty area ask yourself this.  Is there a possibility that your ball could be lost outside the penalty area?  IF so then you would need to act accordingly.  Back to the tee or if E 5 was in effect then out to the fairway and add 2 strokes.  

Edited by denkea
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
1 hour ago, denkea said:

Well, I'm going to have to go against the consensus here.  Unless you know for virtual certainty that you ball crossed into the penalty area ask yourself this.  Is there a possibility that your ball could be lost outside the penalty area?  IF so then you would need to act accordingly.  Back to the tee or if E 5 was in effect then out to the fairway and add 2 strokes.  

I don't think you're going against the consensus, really, I'd certainly agree that the ball must be Known or Virtually Certain to be in the Penalty Area.  As I read the original post, I believe that @xcelrr8 WAS virtually certain that the ball was in the PA, and was asking about what his relief options were.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think from the OP all players felt it was in the PA or the opponents would not have pushed for S&D. The question I am struggling with is making a "Reasonable Judgement" on where the ball crossed into the PA to identify where to drop.  In the OP photo the red line (possible path 1) crosses into the PA just a little past the 1st bunker (Not where the red line ends, more like half-way along the red line) and the white line (possible path 2) enters the PA past the 2nd bunker.  It's hard to tell from the diagram but is the difference between the 2 points 30-40-50 yards?  The greater the distance between the two potential areas the less likely to make a "Reasonable Judgement" of where it entered and where to drop.  I understand that without TV Cameras and Forecaddies none of know exactly where our ball may have crossed, we pick a tree, bush or other landmark and use that, but at what point does it become impossible to make a "Reasonable Judgement".  Also, I understand the problem with the word "Reasonable" but that is what I see in Rule 1.3 per below.

https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=pe&section=rule&rulenum=1

 

22 hours ago, xcelrr8 said:

After that we would be guessing as to where it landed and bounced out.

Adding on, even in the OP they said it would be guess where it went out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 9/28/2021 at 9:04 AM, StuM said:

I think from the OP all players felt it was in the PA or the opponents would not have pushed for S&D. The question I am struggling with is making a "Reasonable Judgement" on where the ball crossed into the PA to identify where to drop.  In the OP photo the red line (possible path 1) crosses into the PA just a little past the 1st bunker (Not where the red line ends, more like half-way along the red line) and the white line (possible path 2) enters the PA past the 2nd bunker.  It's hard to tell from the diagram but is the difference between the 2 points 30-40-50 yards?  The greater the distance between the two potential areas the less likely to make a "Reasonable Judgement" of where it entered and where to drop.  I understand that without TV Cameras and Forecaddies none of know exactly where our ball may have crossed, we pick a tree, bush or other landmark and use that, but at what point does it become impossible to make a "Reasonable Judgement".  Also, I understand the problem with the word "Reasonable" but that is what I see in Rule 1.3 per below.

https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=pe&section=rule&rulenum=1

 

Adding on, even in the OP they said it would be guess where it went out.

I struggle with "Virtually Certain" all the time since us mortals don't have zoom vision.  I've bet my buddies that my ball was in a trap only to find that it was 40 yards past it.  None of us can see the course from above while we're playing so we can "only" estimate as to where our ball is.  I normally hit around 250/300 yards off the tee so I am always guessing as to where my ball is even when I'm dead center in the fairway.  Very few holes give an unobstructed view of the fairway to see where the ball bounces or bounces out.  If "virtually certain" means that you need to see it in the hazard then that's f'd up.  I'd like to see tour pros get no assistance in finding their ball like all of us.  That would result in way more drops and re-hits just like the rest of us.  I will use "Reasonable Judgement" over "Virtually Certain" because that does not exist on a course without help 250 yards down.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, xcelrr8 said:

If "virtually certain" means that you need to see it in the hazard then that's f'd up.

I don't think that KVC is a problem, in general, other than players needing to understand its more conclusive than "best guess".  You do NOT need to be able to see the ball in the Penalty Area.  For this particular hole, relying on the satellite photos and my memory, this is fairway, a couple of bunkers, and well-trimmed rough right up to the edge of the Penalty Area.  If a ball isn't found, its Virtually Certain to be in the PA, there's no place else it could be.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, xcelrr8 said:

I will use "Reasonable Judgement" over "Virtually Certain" because that does not exist on a course without help 250 yards down.

That’s not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, xcelrr8 said:

I struggle with "Virtually Certain" all the time since us mortals don't have zoom vision.  I've bet my buddies that my ball was in a trap only to find that it was 40 yards past it.  None of us can see the course from above while we're playing so we can "only" estimate as to where our ball is.  I normally hit around 250/300 yards off the tee so I am always guessing as to where my ball is even when I'm dead center in the fairway.  Very few holes give an unobstructed view of the fairway to see where the ball bounces or bounces out.  If "virtually certain" means that you need to see it in the hazard then that's f'd up.  I'd like to see tour pros get no assistance in finding their ball like all of us.  That would result in way more drops and re-hits just like the rest of us.  I will use "Reasonable Judgement" over "Virtually Certain" because that does not exist on a course without help 250 yards down.     

You should use orange golf balls. I know from experience that they are much easier to see go into penalty areas. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, xcelrr8 said:

I struggle with "Virtually Certain" all the time since us mortals don't have zoom vision.  I've bet my buddies that my ball was in a trap only to find that it was 40 yards past it.  .................. I will use "Reasonable Judgement" over "Virtually Certain" because that does not exist on a course without help 250 yards down.     

I hate to break it to you but you've destroyed your own argument with your own example.

 This is EXACTLY why you have to be virtually certain. You have more chance of being virtually certain that you DON'T KNOW where your ball is than you have of your "reasonable judgement" being correct in examples like yours. Probably best just to play by the rules than to make up your own because it might shave  a couple of shots of your score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 hours ago, xcelrr8 said:

I'd like to see tour pros get no assistance in finding their ball like all of us

I too would like to see that.  Unfortunately, nothing will stop the fans from converging on the area the ball landed so they will always have a better chance of finding it than us non-tour players.

In the OP I am not struggling at all with being "Virtually Certain" the ball was in the hazard.  It seems to me both the player & his opponents all felt very confident it was in the PA.  My issue is the "Reasonable Judgement" on where it entered the hazard and thus where to drop.  My issue is the OP clearly said:

On 9/27/2021 at 1:53 PM, xcelrr8 said:

There was a very strong wind moving the ball to the right so from our point of view it stayed left of the 1st sand trap.  After that we would be guessing as to where it landed and bounced out

Can a "Guess" be considered "Reasonable Judgement?  Not knowing the course I cannot tell distances but how long is the potential area that it may have crossed into the PA?  Player's Edition Rule 1.3 reads "There are times when you must make estimates, such as the spot where to replace your ball, the point where your ball crossed the edge of a penalty area or when taking relief under the Rules.  You are expected to consider all available information and to make a reasonable judgment in the circumstances. "  The Full Rules 1.3b2 reads So long as the player does what can be reasonably expected under the circumstances to make an accurate determination, the player’s reasonable judgment will be accepted even if, after the stroke is made, the determination is shown to be wrong by video evidence or other information. 

I have no problem if you say "It went out just past this tall pine" and you drop in the vicinity of the tall pine vs. "It went out somewhere between here & 50 yards forward" and you choose to drop at the point closest to the green or the spot that gives you the clearest approach to the green based on your "Guess".   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, StuM said:

Can a "Guess" be considered "Reasonable Judgement?

You can't use "reasonable judgment" to determine if your ball is in a PA. If virtually certain it is in the PA, you can use reasonable judgment to determine where to drop.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • DAY 1: Indoor Range Session w/ Irons -- focus on clubhead orientation during takeaway [30 min.]
    • So, I spent a little time testing out these golf balls with my Mevo+. As many know, indoors, the spin can be off due to the short amount of time a radar has has to measure spin. Metal dots help, but even then, FlightScope users will occasionally see an italic spin number. Italics are your FlightScope's way of saying "I think this is a decent spin number, but I'm not super confident in that." Sometimes the number is half, or double, and sometimes it's just off by some random factor. Sometimes it's dead accurate. The point is, when the number is italic, your FlightScope is unsure. It's not confident. I tested these balls out by hitting a Pro V1 RCT and a Pro V1x RCT along-side a 2021 Pro V1 and Pro V1x. The regular golf balls were "stickered" with a single metallic dot, which we oriented at the top of the golf ball*. A few mid-irons were chosen, with ball speeds ranging from 115 to 135 MPH. Shots were distributed somewhat randomly, while all clubs were hit with all clubs evenly. 20 shots were hit with each ball (4 each with a 5I, 6I, 7I, 9I, SW). Truly bad impacts were discarded. Here are the results. The Pro V1 Dot saw spin numbers that ranged from 3592 to 10918. 8 of the 20 results were italicized. All of the italicized numbers were in the 3590 to 3950 range, while the lowest non-italicized number was 4816. Some of the italicized results were hit with higher lofted clubs than the 4816 club. The Pro V1 RCT saw spin numbers in a much tighter range, and more consistent when hit with the same club. Spin numbers ranged from 5221 to 11875, but within each club, spin numbers were within ± 750 RPM. There were no italic numbers. The Pro V1x Dot saw spin numbers again that ranged from 3586 to 9342. Six of the 20 numbers were italicized. The Pro V1x RCT saw spin numbers that ranged from 4791 (this was a toe-biased contact with a 5I) to 11752. Spin numbers were relatively consistent within each club, and once again, there were no italic numbers. Of 40 balls hit with the dotted V1/V1x, 14 were italicized. 14/40 is 35%. Of the 40 balls hit with the RCT versions, 0 were italicized. All got standard, "trustworthy" spin results according to the FlightScope Mevo+. As you may know, the FlightScope Mevo+ and all other launch monitors, particularly when used indoors, have ballistics models. They read what they can — launch angles, ball speed, spin (RPM, spin axis) — and combine those with the environmental factors you've set (like altitude, temperature, etc.) to calculate the ball's trajectory: the peak height, the distance, the landing angle, the curve. If the spin is off — say, instead of being 7200 the Mevo+ or your launch monitor thinks it's spinning at 5500 — you're going to get a poorly calculated ball flight. Your sim game will not be accurate, or your range or practice session, or your skills challenge, or whatever you're doing on your launch monitor. WOW. I'm impressed. Now, it wasn't the biggest sample size, but 14 (35%) >> 0. I'm going to be buying a few dozen of each of the V1 and V1x RCT models. Though they were developed with Trackman, the press release says they should work with all other radar, and that seems to be true. Further enhancements may be possible, too, but even if there are none the results were quite believable. I plan to use my Mevo+ (with the Pro package at some point) in the GEARS bay, and occasionally for regular lessons. It'll be nice not to have to worry about the metallic dots — how they're oriented, whether they're wearing off from impact with the net, etc. * You'll often read to place the dot on the front of the golf ball, because then when you hit the ball with backspin, it spins front to back. Placing the dot on the top accomplishes the same thing while spreading out the contact point on the golf ball around the "equator" instead of the one place opposite the metal dot.
    • Has anyone tried the new MacGregor VIP irons that are being sold by online retailers for around $200?  
    • So same feels - open hips and chest to camera to get as wide as I can but seems like this raising up at A4 shit is stubborn. Turn through and exit are okayish so meh..  BTW, this Cally Apex 18 deg is a lot of fun to train with. Doesn't tolerate half ass swings. Lol.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. david7w5
      david7w5
      (49 years old)
    2. Jmwest76
      Jmwest76
      (45 years old)
    3. Mikael Detterberg
      Mikael Detterberg
      (39 years old)
    4. NEhomer
      NEhomer
      (61 years old)
    5. RangeGolfer
      RangeGolfer
      (40 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...