Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1594 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can our local women's league establish this rule for money game payouts? (It does not change score postings for handicap purposes.) Or does this go against USGA rules?

 

"EVEN WHEN THE BALL IS NOT HOLED AND MAX NET DOUBLE BOGEY IS RECORDED, HANDICAP STROKES ARE STILL DEDUCTED FOR THAT HOLE."


  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Southern by Choice said:

Can our local women's league establish this rule for money game payouts? (It does not change score postings for handicap purposes.) Or does this go against USGA rules?

 

"EVEN WHEN THE BALL IS NOT HOLED AND MAX NET DOUBLE BOGEY IS RECORDED, HANDICAP STROKES ARE STILL DEDUCTED FOR THAT HOLE."

There's nothing in the Rules of Golf that tells anyone how to award money in competitions.  The right thing is to define it all in advance, and it sounds like that is being done.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

It not only doesn't go "against" the USGA's rules, it's completely endorsed by and allowed in the "USGA's Rules."

https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/definitions.html#_efdbaf54-e2f8-4990-a4b2-8eacb96eefe2

You're just playing the alternate form of stroke play, the "Maximum Score" form of stroke play.

Completely fine.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, Southern by Choice said:

rule for money game payouts?

Also as mentioned above, there is a format of a common game played by many with the "Max Rule"
It is the Stableford Point Game.

It's a simple scoring manner which is popular and benefits the Higher Handicap players.
As opposed to the Stroke Play format, an example would be the higher handicap player will typically score
several holes above a dbl bogey as opposed to a lower player may only have one or none.
This format levels the play for all golfers.

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
4 minutes ago, Club Rat said:

It's a simple scoring manner which is popular and benefits the Higher Handicap players.

This format levels the play for all golfers.

You contradicted yourself. Stableford at 80% handicaps or something might be level. At 100% it favors (isn’t level) higher handicaps.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 12/31/2021 at 10:19 PM, DaveP043 said:

There's nothing in the Rules of Golf that tells anyone how to award money in competitions.  The right thing is to define it all in advance, and it sounds like that is being done.

Thanks for your response.  We have played this way for years:  original max was 10, then double par, and now NDB, since the WHS instituted it.  Our new League Board is comprised of our mid-level handicappers, who feel giving strokes when the ball is not holed is unfair and favors the high handicappers.  The NEW rule is:

FOR THE PURPOSES OF OUR MONEY GAMES, IF YOU PICK UP BEFORE HOLING THE BALL—EVEN AT MAX NET DOUBLE BOGEY—NO HANDICAP STROKES WILL BE AWARDED FOR THAT HOLE.  (Scores for posting continue to follow WHS guidelines.)

Our local pros are adamant in their opinions that anything involving money must be HOLED OUT, and claim that pace of play is not adversely affected—which supports the Board's position.  The Board also cites adherence to USGA rules as the reason for the change, but I can’t find this exact scenario anywhere…

Happy New Year from the Lowcountry of South Carolina, where we played golf in sunny 80 degree weather!


  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Southern by Choice said:

FOR THE PURPOSES OF OUR MONEY GAMES, IF YOU PICK UP BEFORE HOLING THE BALL—EVEN AT MAX NET DOUBLE BOGEY—NO HANDICAP STROKES WILL BE AWARDED FOR THAT HOLE.  (Scores for posting continue to follow WHS guidelines.)

What score is used for that hole?  If the ball isn't holed, the player doesn't have a Gross score.  Does this wording mean that the player gets whatever GROSS score would result in a net double, and that score also counts as their NET score (i.e. the score isn't reduced by any applicable handicap strokes?).  Or is the player disqualified for not completing the play of a hole?  Is this essentially now a stroke play competition with no maximum score?  That's certainly an acceptable format, but I'd be amazed if the occasional 12 or 15 doesn't slow play at times.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

What score is used for that hole?  If the ball isn't holed, the player doesn't have a Gross score.  Does this wording mean that the player gets whatever GROSS score would result in a net double, and that score also counts as their NET score (i.e. the score isn't reduced by any applicable handicap strokes?).  Or is the player disqualified for not completing the play of a hole?  Is this essentially now a stroke play competition with no maximum score?  That's certainly an acceptable format, but I'd be amazed if the occasional 12 or 15 doesn't slow play at times.  

If a player picks up, she receives her NDB score for the hole for both GROSS and NET.  A par 5 and I get 2 strokes; NDB is 9.  So if I pick up, I score a 9 for 9.  But it gets worse:  suppose I’m lying 9 with a long putt ahead.  I can pick up OR I can choose to try to hole it, earning a 10 for 8.  So I get a net 8 for the "money game" but still post a max NDB 9 for GHIN.  (Obviously, there’s a point of diminishing returns, where actual strokes for the hole less my handicap strokes are more than my max NDB.)

Confused yet?  I can guarantee the players will be!  Many don’t even know their NDB for each hole.  And some local courses we play haven’t set up hole-by-hole posting, so the GHIN scores could be messed up, too.  🤦🏻


  • Administrator
Posted
31 minutes ago, Southern by Choice said:

 I can pick up OR I can choose to try to hole it, earning a 10 for 8.  So I get a net 8 for the "money game" but still post a max NDB 9 for GHIN.

It's still fine, though, no? What am I not getting?

If you lie 9, and you make the putt, you haven't picked up. So you get a 10 for 8 either way: for posting to your handicap or with two strokes in your handicap game.

If you pick up, you get NDB gross and for your handicap: so a 9 for your game (when you could have had an 8 if you had holed it), and you'll post a 9 to GHIN.


I disagree with your pros. If you've previously played "max 10" or "max double par" or any other format, playing "max NDB" is just another form of stroke-limited stroke play. It's completely within the USGA Rules of Golf.

I do recommend playing at 80% or at least 90% handicaps, though. Full handicaps is often brutal on the lower handicappers.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1594 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I mean, looking at the leaderboard, several other kids shot in the 60s. No? Miles Russell is a high school kid. He made the cut on the KFT as a freshman.
    • "This video features a roundtable discussion hosted by Michigan Golf Live regarding a controversial high school golf score of 60 (11 under par) recently posted by a student at Anchor Bay High School. Key Discussion Points: The Controversy: The score has generated significant skepticism among the golfing community, with viewers and industry experts debating its legitimacy. The host notes that despite multiple invitations, the Anchor Bay coach declined to join the program to discuss the round (5:38). Historical Context: Guests, including former coach Rob McIntyre and rules official Terry Kildday, reflect on a 2018 controversy involving the same schools, where suspiciously low regional scores were not replicated at state finals, causing significant frustration for competing teams like Rochester Adams (10:40, 13:10). Scrutiny of Scorekeeping: The panel emphasizes that the modern IWR (I Wanna Maker) app system, while helpful, lacks the accountability of traditional walking scorers. There is a consensus among the guests that high school golf often lacks rigorous rule enforcement, leaving too much room for "creative" scorekeeping or simple misunderstandings of the rules (24:48, 54:43). Probability vs. Talent: While the guests acknowledge the possibility of a "round of a lifetime," they point to statistical probability tools suggesting such a score for a typical high school player is mathematically extreme (7:43, 31:32). Conclusion: The participants generally agree that while they wish to celebrate exceptional youth athletic achievements, the lack of transparency, verification, and willingness from the involved parties to address questions makes it difficult to definitively endorse the record. The conversation serves as a broader call for higher standards, better education on the rules of golf, and more proactive oversight in high school tournaments to "protect the field" (1:02:22)." I was curious about the statical improbability, so I asked it to go more into that part. I know the USGA has probabilities, but that takes into account the differential.  "The host explains that they utilized a mobile app designed to analyze the statistical probability of golf scores to evaluate the 11-under-par round. (6:15 - 6:26) Because the student had no established scoring record (with only a single posted score of 83), the team ran several hypothetical scenarios through the app's filter: 15 Handicap: The app determined the score was practically impossible. (7:13 - 7:16) 5 Handicap: Testing the score for a 5 handicap yielded the same outcome as the 15 handicap. (7:20- 7:26) Scratch Golfer: When they ran the calculation for a scratch golfer—someone who should theoretically be capable of playing at a high level—the app estimated that such a person would shoot an 11-under-par round only once every 5,214 years. (7:30 - 7:53)"
    • Well what does it say? Paste it here!
    • Yea, I used YouTube’s Ai to summarize the video for me into bullet points. 😊
    • I mean, the video is an hour long, so… @dennyjones, any time stamps to check out? 🙂 Cuz otherwise…
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.