Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Stroke Gained Discovery When Trying to Find Weak Areas in My Game


Note: This thread is 745 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Me like others gather their own stroke gained (SG) stats to find out the weak points in our game in comparison of our pears or against the PGA tour. 
I usually record putting (short, middle, long), around the green (putt, chip, sand), off the tee (driver, woods, irons) and approach to green (250-225, 225-200,..., 75-50).
In every "approach to green" distance category I average around 0.15 strokes lost per shot against the PGA tour. Pretty consistent average from 50 to 250 yards so I always assumed I didn't needed to focus my training in any specific distance. 

But... BIG but.. last weekend I took the time to change the way I records the stats, besides the SG stats on my approach shots, I also tracked the real amount of stroke it took for me to hole out from every distance to the green between 250 and 50 yards. I gathered information of the last 10 round (same as the normal SG). The results were totally different.
Inside 75 yards I averaged 0 SG (2.75 real strokes to hole out) , between 75 and 175 I was loosing around 0.15 SG on each category and shockingly from 175 to 250 I was losing 0.35 SG on each category. So basically I'm really bad when I have to play shots outside 175 even when the normal SG stats told me everything was OK.

Thoughts?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
47 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Me like others gather their own stroke gained (SG) stats to find out the weak points in our game in comparison of our pears or against the PGA tour. 
I usually record putting (short, middle, long), around the green (putt, chip, sand), off the tee (driver, woods, irons) and approach to green (250-225, 225-200,..., 75-50).
In every "approach to green" distance category I average around 0.15 strokes lost per shot against the PGA tour. Pretty consistent average from 50 to 250 yards so I always assumed I didn't needed to focus my training in any specific distance. 

But... BIG but.. last weekend I took the time to change the way I records the stats, besides the SG stats on my approach shots, I also tracked the real amount of stroke it took for me to hole out from every distance to the green between 250 and 50 yards. I gathered information of the last 10 round (same as the normal SG). The results were totally different.
Inside 75 yards I averaged 0 SG (2.75 real strokes to hole out) , between 75 and 175 I was loosing around 0.15 SG on each category and shockingly from 175 to 250 I was losing 0.35 SG on each category. So basically I'm really bad when I have to play shots outside 175 even when the normal SG stats told me everything was OK.

Thoughts?

What that tells me is that your short game needs work. If your shots from 175-250 are losing 0.15 shots, but you are actually losing 0.35 shots, you're losing another 0.2 shots somewhere. The difference between each of those buckets is that from further away you are missing more greens, so more pressure is being put on your short game. Basically you're 0.2 shots worse than PGA Tour average from wherever you are ending up. Given that you are zero from inside 75 yards, presumably your pitching is pretty darn good, so chipping seems to me to make the most sense. How are your strokes gained around the green?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
46 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

What that tells me is that your short game needs work. If your shots from 175-250 are losing 0.15 shots, but you are actually losing 0.35 shots, you're losing another 0.2 shots somewhere.

Possibly, but I'm curious if he actually meant he's losing 0.15 on every category. I first read it as:

  • From 0-75 he's losing 0.
  • From 75-175 he's losing 0.15.
  • From 175-250 he's losing 0.35.

But what if he meant from 0-250 he's losing 0.15 average?

Because if he's as good as a Tour player from 0-75 (which I'd argue is "short game" and obviously he has to putt and stuff in there), then his short game is pretty good… and when he's 200 yards out, he's hitting it in some really awful places.


More clarification is needed from @p1n9183, though. Could you please add that clarification?

How many shots from 175-250 are you hitting per round? If you're only hitting one of them a round… it matters less that you lose more there. After all, you are not a PGA Tour player, so… you can lose a little ground in some places. If you're losing 0.15 from 75-175 14 times a round, that adds up to 2.1 shots, and would outweigh 0.35 shots once a round.

How are you calculating these, and what are the averages? Can you show us the data for every 25-yard bucket? In two ways:

  1. Strokes gained on the approach shot itself (and the resulting lie/distance).
  2. Strokes to hole out (counting the chips and pitches and putts after that).

For #1, that's just… "From 200-225, I leave it 73 feet from the hole on average" (we can estimate how often that is fairway, rough, green, bunkers, etc.).


Penalty strokes alone might account for a lot of the 175-250 difference, too, @Ty_Webb. Don't be so quick to jump on the short game.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
45 minutes ago, iacas said:

then his short game is pretty good… and when he's 200 yards out, he's hitting it in some really awful places.

 

This, right?

If he were hitting greens or nGIRs like he does the shorter distances he wouldn't be losing any more strokes than those zones. Having said that I am curious as to why this is surprising. Seems intuitive as to what distance zone he would lose most strokes (furthest). 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

  50-75 75-100 100-125 125-150 150-175 175-200 200-225 225-250
SG -0.18 -0.18 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.13 -0.16 -0.11
SG Real -0.01 -0.19 -0.21 -0.06 -0.17 -0.39 -0.34 -0.34
Total Strokes 2.74 2.99 3.07 2.99 3.19 3.54 3.64 3.79
Avg Shots PRound 1.30 1.00 3.20 1.70 2.50 0.90 0.50 0.80

SG is Stroke gained against PGA Tour only on the approach shots. SG Real is the real amount of shots I take from 50 to 250 yards to hole out against the PGA Tour. I don't have chips/putts from each distance. I do have SG putting and around the green. I'm really good around the greens, not that good around 30ish yards (no stats for that, just a guess). Good lag putter but struggle inside 15/10 feet. 

Green Side Putting
-0.5 -1.3
Putt Chip Sand Short Mid Long
-0.1 -0.1 -0.3 -1.2 -0.1 0.0

From what you say, I guess on long shots I leave myselft too many 30sh shots and a bunch short putts for par in witch a loose a lot of partial shots. 

As i match myselft against the pga SG I do record the lie of the ball but I don't make a different category for it. On the 10 rounds of the data gathered (I delete the 11th every time a new round is played) I only took 1 OB from 160 in the rough.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In addition, I don't take in consideration Par 3s for the approach stat because I struggle more with irons and wood of the deck, from the tee is a completly different story so I don't want mix up the numbers and get to a wrong conclusion. Also don't consider shots from the trees, only fairway, rough or bunker. That's why my average of approach shots to the green is around 12.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

As i match myselft against the pga SG I do record the lie of the ball but I don't make a different category for it. On the 10 rounds of the data gathered (I delete the 11th every time a new round is played) I only took 1 OB from 160 in the rough.

Right, so how many shots do you have from 175-250? It's probably not a lot, and if you delete rounds after 10… you're probably looking at a smaller sample size than I'd be comfortable using to make judgments.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 hours ago, iacas said:

Because if he's as good as a Tour player from 0-75 (which I'd argue is "short game" and obviously he has to putt and stuff in there), then his short game is pretty good… and when he's 200 yards out, he's hitting it in some really awful places.

He said starting at 50 yards. 50-75 is borderline between short game and approach IMO. It's certainly not indicative of full short game.

His handicap is also +1.4, which would tend to suggest not that many penalty shots, but I agree I had not thought of that as a possible reason.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

He said starting at 50 yards. 50-75 is borderline between short game and approach IMO. It's certainly not indicative of full short game.

His handicap is also +1.4, which would tend to suggest not that many penalty shots, but I agree I had not thought of that as a possible reason.

Pretty moot at this point since he supplied more data, and he says his short game is pretty good (most +1.4s have a pretty good short game).

Though, again, he didn't share the number of shots hit from the various ranges.

@p1n9183, my two questions for you remain:

  1. What are the number of shots hit from each of those ranges?
  2. How are you classifying the results of the shots? Is everything just "rough" when you miss the green, or are you classifying things into different categories (i.e. if you hit your ball into a horrible spot, that's different than hitting it into typical greenside rough).

I'm still not super comfortable with deleting rounds after they're the 11th round, because you're looking at a pretty small sample size (particularly from some of the longer ranges), but too late for that now I guess.

Are you using GolfMetrics or something somewhat official?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, iacas said:

What are the number of shots hit from each of those ranges?

I think if you look at his "average shots per round" row and multiply by 10 that will give you how many shots are in each bucket

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
14 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

I think if you look at his "average shots per round" row and multiply by 10 that will give you how many shots are in each bucket

I wanted to be certain, as those add up to less than 12. Take out the four (?) par threes, and he's still two short. Maybe they're drivable par fours?

Anyway, I was hoping he'd clarify. And, yes, those 75 yards account for only about 2 shots (2.2) per 18 holes, so… not super significant.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, iacas said:

I wanted to be certain, as those add up to less than 12. Take out the four (?) par threes, and he's still two short. Maybe they're drivable par fours?

Anyway, I was hoping he'd clarify. And, yes, those 75 yards account for only about 2 shots (2.2) per 18 holes, so… not super significant.

He said he also excludes shots from in the trees (I guess recovery shots). 2 of those seems like a lot, but a drivable four and one shot in the trees makes sense - or maybe his course has five par threes.

On a separate note, he also said his short game was good, but he posted that his short game is -0.5 strokes gained and his short putting is -1.2. If his short game is a little off, he's leaving himself lots of putts in the "short" range, where he is also losing strokes. So from 175-250, he's missing some greens (which PGA tour players do too, with some regularity) and leaving himself in the thick of his poor range with short game and therefore putts, which all adds up to another 0.2 strokes lost. 

If he's putting himself into penalty areas, that should be applied to the approach shot too, so that's clearly not what he's doing. 

Seems pretty clear to me that if he wants to improve that -0.35 from 175-250 then his approach play isn't the problem, it's his short game (mostly bunker play it seems) and short putting he needs to improve.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
36 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

He said he also excludes shots from in the trees (I guess recovery shots). 2 of those seems like a lot, but a drivable four and one shot in the trees makes sense - or maybe his course has five par threes.

The point is that 75 yards covers about two shots on the 18 holes, and they're in an area where PGA Tour players separate themselves the most, so expecting him to get that closer to 0.2 or something is probably a fool's errand, particularly given:

He only carries his driver 260. Expecting him to get much better from 175-250 (250!) for 2 shots a round is quite likely a bad use of time.

36 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

On a separate note, he also said his short game was good, but he posted that his short game is -0.5 strokes gained and his short putting is -1.2.

-0.5 is not bad compared to a PGA Tour player, though 60% of it being in the sand probably warrants a little attention.

36 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

his short putting is -1.2

Yes, that's the discovery here: he needs to work on his short putting. I'd be curious to know how well he's estimating the distances of putts (people regularly call 12 footers 8 feet, etc. - see also Minjee Lee), but if there's an area to work on, that's it.

36 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

Seems pretty clear to me that if he wants to improve that -0.35 from 175-250 then his approach play isn't the problem, it's his short game (mostly bunker play it seems) and short putting he needs to improve.

No, not the short game (except for spending 15 minutes in a bunker once, as a lot of that variance from the sand is due to the less ideal conditions we face over Tour players). Short putting, yes, with the caveat that I'd really want to know how accurate the estimated lengths are.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

The point is that 75 yards covers about two shots on the 18 holes, and they're in an area where PGA Tour players separate themselves the most, so expecting him to get that closer to 0.2 or something is probably a fool's errand, particularly given:

He only carries his driver 260. Expecting him to get much better from 175-250 (250!) for 2 shots a round is quite likely a bad use of time.

-0.5 is not bad compared to a PGA Tour player, though 60% of it being in the sand probably warrants a little attention.

Yes, that's the discovery here: he needs to work on his short putting. I'd be curious to know how well he's estimating the distances of putts (people regularly call 12 footers 8 feet, etc. - see also Minjee Lee), but if there's an area to work on, that's it.

No, not the short game (except for spending 15 minutes in a bunker once, as a lot of that variance from the sand is due to the less ideal conditions we face over Tour players). Short putting, yes, with the caveat that I'd really want to know how accurate the estimated lengths are.

I think he's already pretty good from 175-250 so little point in working too hard on that range (although you don't want to neglect it). 

You are certainly right about the distances. I think people underestimate the length of putts all the time. Frequently see strokes gained approach being way better than reality because they're "hitting it to 20 feet", when it's more like 30 and correspondingly strokes gained putting is worse than reality. 6-10 feet is a range where the slope is steep (by which I mean the make rates from 6' vs 7' are very different, where the make rates from 21' to 22' are virtually the same and from 1' to 2' are also virtually the same). Every inch in that range makes a difference to make rates and that means if you're off by 10% at 6' you have a marked impact on your strokes gained, while if you're off by 10% at 20' it won't really affect it much. 

It's not what we're talking about here, but I thought it was quite interesting. If you group first putts and second putts into feet, the make rates on second putts are better than first putts. There is potentially a little bit of that is from more knowledge from watching it break, but the main reason for that difference is second putts are more likely to be on the short end of the range and first putts are more likely to be on the long end of the range. So a putt from 3-4 feet if it's a first putt is more likely to be close to 4' than 3' where a second putt is more likely to be close to 3' than 4'. Those few inches closer make a difference in make rates. So could easily see the -1.2 being a measurement issue rather than a putting issue. If it is, then maybe it really is the approach shots that are the issue. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

You are certainly right about the distances. I think people underestimate the length of putts all the time. Frequently see strokes gained approach being way better than reality because they're "hitting it to 20 feet", when it's more like 30 and correspondingly strokes gained putting is worse than reality. 6-10 feet is a range where the slope is steep (by which I mean the make rates from 6' vs 7' are very different, where the make rates from 21' to 22' are virtually the same and from 1' to 2' are also virtually the same). Every inch in that range makes a difference to make rates and that means if you're off by 10% at 6' you have a marked impact on your strokes gained, while if you're off by 10% at 20' it won't really affect it much. 

I chuckle as I read this because… I know that stuff as well as almost anyone else in the world. 😄 I appreciate that it's said so someone else reading it can learn some things, but… duh. 😄

2 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

So could easily see the -1.2 being a measurement issue rather than a putting issue. If it is, then maybe it really is the approach shots that are the issue. 

Yes, which is why I asked how he's estimating or measuring his putts. It's very easy to mis-estimate.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
43 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yes, which is why I asked how he's estimating or measuring his putts. It's very easy to mis-estimate.

Probably the best way is to learn how to pace off putts. If you become decent at it, it's pretty accurate. 

Even GPS units are not that accurate. Doing a google search....

GPS-enabled smartphones are typically accurate to within a 4.9 m (16 ft.) radius under open sky (view source at ION.org). 

It might be a bit stupid, but a good range finder will have 1 yard accuracy. So, 3-FT isn't maybe that bad at longer range putts. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, iacas said:

I chuckle as I read this because… I know that stuff as well as almost anyone else in the world. 😄 I appreciate that it's said so someone else reading it can learn some things, but… duh. 😄

Yes, which is why I asked how he's estimating or measuring his putts. It's very easy to mis-estimate.

Just trying to edumacate 🙂 (and I know you know this stuff)

I'd say it's almost impossible not to. Unless you get a measuring tape out or use professional surveying equipment it's going to be off. 

Edited by Ty_Webb
Clarity
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

I'd say it's almost impossible not to. Unless you get a measuring tape out or use professional surveying equipment it's going to be off. 

You can pace it off and do a pretty good job.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 745 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.