Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a high handicap , been playing for a year or so and am in my addiction phase. I love learning about the game and do some reading and most of my YouTube watches are golf related but unfortunately don’t get much time on the course.

I try to play as much as I can when I’m on vacation and that’s always with rental clubs. 
 

My regular driver is a 11 degree Nike Sq with senior flex shaft. The driver is my least favourite club because my most frequent shot is a high weak block/slice which makes it about 200-220 yards.

 

About two weeks ago I went to a decent course with my Dad and the only clubs they had were some sort of Srixon CBs and a titleist 917 8 degree Xstiff 65g driver, which should be way above my pay grade , but too my complete surprise it was the best driving performance I’ve ever had. Hit a few beauts . One of my drives flew the green on a 310 yd par 4!! This was completely unexpected . From all those YouTube videos , I know that a titleist 917 isn’t the most forgiving driver ever made , moreover, with what I thought was my swing speed , Xstiff should be completely the wrong choice?? 
 

Has anyone gone through this or fitted someone like this as well? I’m really interested in finding out more.


Posted

Do not take this the wrong way, and it is a possibility you drove the 310 yard par 4, but did you actually GPS or Laser the flag for distance? A lot of times, courses will use the up tee boxes. They will also just outright not measure the hole correctly. Just saying, I would always question the scorecard. The best way to figure out your driver distance is to use a launch monitor. 

That being said, the person reacts to how the golf shaft flexes in the swing. Since there is no industry standard to shaft flex, just ignore the flex on the golf shaft. The make/model of the golf shaft matters more than the flex written on it. It is very much possible you might have been compensating for the feel of the golf club with the weaker golf shaft. Also, it could be just a good day of driving (timing). The more swing faults you have the more timing you need. You could have had a good day. 

I would say you would need to use that new driver for a few more rounds and track the results. It could be you end up going back to your normal miss of slicing the ball. 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Congrats - It's fun to be able to bomb it once in a while.

Tough to provide a whole lot of advice on your topic.  There is quite a bit of difference between a 8 degree loft and a 11 degree loft driver, and there is quite a bit of difference between a senior flex shaft and an extra stiff shaft.  You obviously have some good swing speed to be able to hit it 300+.  Neither the loft of the shaft is going to be the reason you were hitting it 100 yards better than usual though.  I'd assume that for whatever reason you were hitting the ball towards the middle of the clubface that day, and if you could do that similarly with your own driver, you'd be seeing a lot better results.  Either that or your Nike head is damaged and you need to get rid of it. 

  • Informative 1

John


Posted
21 hours ago, Forgivemefatherforihavethinned said:

I am a high handicap , been playing for a year or so and am in my addiction phase. I love learning about the game and do some reading and most of my YouTube watches are golf related but unfortunately don’t get much time on the course.

I try to play as much as I can when I’m on vacation and that’s always with rental clubs. 
 

My regular driver is a 11 degree Nike Sq with senior flex shaft. The driver is my least favourite club because my most frequent shot is a high weak block/slice which makes it about 200-220 yards.

 

About two weeks ago I went to a decent course with my Dad and the only clubs they had were some sort of Srixon CBs and a titleist 917 8 degree Xstiff 65g driver, which should be way above my pay grade , but too my complete surprise it was the best driving performance I’ve ever had. Hit a few beauts . One of my drives flew the green on a 310 yd par 4!! This was completely unexpected . From all those YouTube videos , I know that a titleist 917 isn’t the most forgiving driver ever made , moreover, with what I thought was my swing speed , Xstiff should be completely the wrong choice?? 
 

Has anyone gone through this or fitted someone like this as well? I’m really interested in finding out more.

Cool. Since it's dad, can he lend it to you for a few rounds? Then go find someone with a launch monitor. A few hits does not make a game, but very possible you would need something than a senior flex regardless of brand.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Shafts flex is more about club speed than index. If you drove a 310 hole then your club speed should be above 110 m/h so you should play and x-stiff shaft, stiff at the softest. regular, senior or ladies shaft are going to be in detriment four your consistency. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Do not take this the wrong way, and it is a possibility you drove the 310 yard par 4, but did you actually GPS or Laser the flag for distance? A lot of times, courses will use the up tee boxes. They will also just outright not measure the hole correctly. Just saying, I would always question the scorecard. The best way to figure out your driver distance is to use a launch monitor. 

That being said, the person reacts to how the golf shaft flexes in the swing. Since there is no industry standard to shaft flex, just ignore the flex on the golf shaft. The make/model of the golf shaft matters more than the flex written on it. It is very much possible you might have been compensating for the feel of the golf club with the weaker golf shaft. Also, it could be just a good day of driving (timing). The more swing faults you have the more timing you need. You could have had a good day. 

I would say you would need to use that new driver for a few more rounds and track the results. It could be you end up going back to your normal miss of slicing the ball. 

 

Thanks saevel25. 

interesting point about swing faults and timing and stiffness.

sounds like a fitting is in order

15 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

Shafts flex is more about club speed than index. If you drove a 310 hole then your club speed should be above 110 m/h so you should play and x-stiff shaft, stiff at the softest. regular, senior or ladies shaft are going to be in detriment four your consistency. 

Thanks 

last measured swing speed an year ago was 85. Maybe things have progressed since then


Posted
19 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

Shafts flex is more about club speed than index. If you drove a 310 hole then your club speed should be above 110 m/h so you should play and x-stiff shaft, stiff at the softest. regular, senior or ladies shaft are going to be in detriment four your consistency. 

It's also more about how the golfer swings the club. You can have a golfer who has the same golf speed as another golf and may need like 20 grams heavier golf shaft, and a much stiffer tip section to the golf shaft. 

Shaft flex should only be thought of as a way to compare the golf shafts of the same make and model. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.