Jump to content
Note: This thread is 5055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I read a semi-interesting yarn by Robert Anthony Prichard:

Tiger Woods Is Getting The Yips

In it, he claims the act of resisting the centrifugal force created by the rotation of the golf swing in order to return the club to its same plane at impact tears muscles beyond repair. For his "proof", he asks you to simply do a google search for "lifting weights muscle fiber tear". He also reports the facts that the best ball-strikers, Snead, Trevino, and Hogan, all struggled with putting. This, he claims, is directly a result of the fact that they maintained their spine angles and club shaft angles at impact from address.

He then shows a couple of images of Tiger from around 2001 and 2007 where he shows the difference between the change in the spine angles at impact and the angle between the right forearm and the club shaft at impact. His claim is that Tiger has switched from a 'Ballistic' hitter: one who lets the swinging weight pull his arms straight, to a 'Gripper': someone who resists the weight of the club in order to maintain spine angle at impact. It is this change, Prichard implies, that is a recipe for the yips in Tiger's game. In fact, he claims, Tiger's putting stats are already starting to bear this out: In 2004, he was ranked #20 in putts/round, and in 2006, he was #137. Nevermind that Tiger was #134 in 2001, well into his 'Ballistic' swinging days.

Most of Prichard's article reads like noise from a wannabe 80's shooter who likes milking folks of their hard-earned money with some promise-but-not-deliver swing method. He does point out some interesting things, though. Why is it that Snead, Trevino, and Hogan all struggled with putting? Does resisting the club head weight actually do lasting damage to your muscles? I know that, in the short term, bicep workouts affect putting feel. This comes from my own experience, really. I literally cannot avoid 3-putting the day after a hard bicep workout. But this isn't because I'm yipping the putter on my stroke. It's more because I can't feel the right distances since my biceps are sore. The weight of my arms also changes considerably because of the increased blood flow, which affects my stroke's rhythm. But, within a couple of days, I'm back to normal. Is there any credibility to his claim that with the modern golf swing, ball-striking and solid putting are mutually exclusive?

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


that is very interesting. bring on the broomstick eh?

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


I Googled the guy. There first three mentions are all about a new book.
There are a few more - all are about the book or articles for sale.
He is described as a "Biomechanics expert" in one of his ads.
Screw him.

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...


  • Administrator
I Googled the guy. There first three mentions are all about a new book.

Ditto all that.

There are a lot of great ballstrikers who didn't suffer from the yips, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hogan struggled with his putting because damage done by the car crash robbed him of some of his depth perception. Had nothing to do with his ball striking.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


I'm not even sure I'd call that semi-interesting.

Driver: 09 Launcher 10.5
4 Wood: 09 Launcher Steel 17
Hybrid: Baffler DWS 20 Aldila Reg
Irons: AP1 4-GW Steel
Wedges: 588 Gunmetal 56 & 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: NXT Tour


It's an interesting study although I'd like further proof of it being true. Plus, it didn't seem like Tiger was truly "yipping" his putts...more like he just couldn't get a putt to fall due to his reads/distances being a tad bit off. But most of Pritchard's stuff is dead on correct. So he may be onto something.




3JACK

I Googled the guy. There first three mentions are all about a new book.

I'm not sure how that makes him a bad guy. Think guys like Harmon, Utley, Haney, Leadbetter, etc. are not pimping something like their schools or books, etc. just about all of the time?

It's how they make money and it's something that they have to constantly have to do to keep their name circulating. 3JACK

It's an interesting study although I'd like further proof of it being true. Plus, it didn't seem like Tiger was truly "yipping" his putts...more like he just couldn't get a putt to fall due to his reads/distances being a tad bit off. But most of Pritchard's stuff is dead on correct. So he may be onto something.

How can you need further proof of truth and declare 'dead on correct' in the same breath?

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...


I'm not even sure I'd call that semi-interesting.

Probably right. Most of what the guy says begs too many questions to mention. But from the images, it does seem that the spine angle straightens when the impact and address planes are different. This does seem like it would be tricky to time correctly. I think this guy's trying to ride the Moe Norman train, incidentally. He mentions that no golfers swing the way he recommends. But his model swing dude looks eerily like Moe Norman...

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


In fact, he claims, Tiger's putting stats are already starting to bear this out: In 2004, he was ranked #20 in putts/round, and in 2006, he was #137. Nevermind that Tiger was #134 in 2001, well into his 'Ballistic' swinging days.

This one in simple (or so I thought). In 2004, Tiger was in the process of retooling his swing and was hitting, according to the stats at pgatour.com, only 66.9% of greens in regulation. Therefore, he had more one-putts for par. In 2006, Tiger lead the PGA Tour in percentage of greens hit (74.15%). Many of his former one-putts for par were now two-putts for par.

It is, however, true that Tiger putted slightly better in 2004 than in 2006. In the former year, he averaged 1.724 putts per GIR with approaches that likely finished father from the hole than those in 2006, when he averaged 1.756 putts per GIR. The following is a list of Tiger's putts per GIR each year he's been on tour. I've including his GIR percentage in parentheses: although this number does not factor into the putts-per-GIR statistics, it gives a good indication of how well Tiger was hitting the ball; when he's hitting more GIR, he's likely hitting it closer to the hole, and therefore should be taking fewer putts. 1996: 1.778 putts per GIR (71.2% GIR) 1997: 1.776 (70.3%) 1998: 1.805 (67.6%) 1999: 1.761 (71.4% 2000: 1.717 (75.2%) 2001: 1.774 (71.9%) 2002: 1.766 (74.0%) 2003: 1.732 (68.63%) 2004: 1.724 (66.9%) 2005: 1.731 (69.9%) 2006: 1.756 (74.15%) 2007: 1.733 (71.02%) From 1996-2002, the hypothesis that Tiger will have fewer putts per GIR when he hits more GIR (and is therefore hitting the ball closer to the hole) proves correct. In this span, his best year in terms of GIR (2000) is also his best year for putts per GIR; conversely, his worst year for putts per GIR (1998) is also his worst year for GIR. After 2002, however, this pattern breaks down. With the exception of 2000, 2003-2007 are Tiger's best years in terms of putts per GIR. Surprisingly, however, his GIR stats are slightly down in many of these years. Even more surprisingly, his best year from 2003-2007 in terms of GIR (2006) is also his worst year in terms of putts per GIR, and his worst year for GIR (2004) is his best for putts per. The author of this article dishonestly used these seemingly fluke numbers from 2004 and 2006 to show that Tiger's putting is declining; evidence from other years, however, disprove this assertion. If anyone has any reasons for the strange numbers in 2004 and 2006, please post them - I'm curious. Ah, the joys of no school, sitting in an air-conditioned room with too much time on my hands...

What's in my bag:

Driver: R7 CGB Max, regular shaft
4-wood and 7-wood: :: Launcher, regular shafts
4-iron to A-wedge: X-20, regular steel shafts56- and 60-degree wedge: forged, stiff steel shafts, vintage finish, MD groovesPutter: Circa '62, No. 7, steel shaft, 35"Ball: NXT Tour or ProV1(x)...


How can you need further proof of truth and declare 'dead on correct' in the same breath?

I didn't. I said *most* of his stuff is dead on correct. I didn't say everything is dead on correct.

Big difference. 3JACK

Probably right. Most of what the guy says begs too many questions to mention. But from the images, it does seem that the spine angle straightens when the impact and address planes are different. This does seem like it would be tricky to time correctly. I think this guy's trying to ride the Moe Norman train, incidentally. He mentions that no golfers swing the way he recommends. But his model swing dude looks eerily like Moe Norman...

No, but tons of golfers try to incorporate some of the same things Moe did...including Tiger Woods. The spine angle isn't supposed to straighten out and if you watch classic ballstrikers like Trevino, Snead, Couples, Garcia, etc....their spine angle is the same throughout the golf swing.

3JACK

My guess about the numbers is that in 2004, when his ballstriking wasn't up to Tiger-standards, he had to scramble his putter a lot more. So his putting got better just out of necessity because the guy is an incredible scorer.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


No, but tons of golfers try to incorporate some of the same things Moe did...including Tiger Woods. The spine angle isn't supposed to straighten out and if you watch classic ballstrikers like Trevino, Snead, Couples, Garcia, etc....their spine angle is the same throughout the golf swing.

Exactly. His point is that when your arms straighten at impact, you must stand up through impact in order to hit the ball. If you preserve your spine angle, you must retain the right-arm/shaft angle you had at address. How much your arms straighten is comparatively how much you must stand up. Since your arms straighten as a result of speed, you have to straighten different heights depending on how hard you swing. He claims this is difficult to time correctly, and I would think he is correct on that point.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


My guess about the numbers is that in 2004, when his ballstriking wasn't up to Tiger-standards, he had to scramble his putter a lot more. So his putting got better just out of necessity because the guy is an incredible scorer.

He was just missing more greens. Only natural to have fewer putts when your GIR % is lower, as Alex B posted. And vice versa, if he's leading the tour in GIR then his putts per round will go up. That's why I hate that stat. Tiger was then and remains the best mid range par putter I have ever seen.

Driver: 09 Launcher 10.5
4 Wood: 09 Launcher Steel 17
Hybrid: Baffler DWS 20 Aldila Reg
Irons: AP1 4-GW Steel
Wedges: 588 Gunmetal 56 & 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: NXT Tour


He was just missing more greens. Only natural to have fewer putts when your GIR % is lower, as Alex B posted. And vice versa, if he's leading the tour in GIR then his putts per round will go up. That's why I hate that stat. Tiger was then and remains the best mid range par putter I have ever seen.

Missed greens don't give you a PPGIR by definition. I think you probably mean PPMGIR, which I agree should be lower.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Ditto all that.

Plus, seeing as how the yips are a mental problem, not a physical problem, it's unlikely Tiger will ever have them.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
    • I would definitely attend if my calendar allows.
    • Finland: I've played Mid-Night Golf in Finland. Really cool. I looked at the schedule for my week out there and I saw that we were teeing off at 9PM... Feels weird, 9 PM tee time. But it was really great. We finished well after 1AM and sat around and drank on the golf course terrace. It was cool. It's really easy to loose track of time when the sun doesn't set.  Here's a picture of me in Finland hitting my approach on the final hole. It's roughly 1:30AM in this photo.  Egypt: Another cool experience was playing golf in Egypt. The entire course is sand. The greens are called browns, cuz they are just sand with oil poured on them and pounded down a bit. Your ball gets kind of oily when you putt, but the caddy cleans it for you after each hole. You carry around a little piece of fake grass (maybe 2 foot square) and place your ball on it each time before you hit. That is except when you go into a sandtrap. The sandtraps are just areas marked off where you don't get to use your little piece of astro-turf. Sometimes they are dug down a bit to make a bunker, sometimes not.  Spain: No special events or anything, but I played a bunch of golf in Spain in the mid-1990's. At that time Spain's economy wasn't doing the best and Europe hadn't quite switched to the Euro. So Spain was using the Peseta. The country of Spain has some incredibly breathtaking courses. (incredible scenery in general) But because of the conversion from the dollar to the Peseta (If memory serves it was 150 to 1), I got to play them for what I remember as being incredibly inexpensive prices. Gorgeous country and really nice people.  Holland or The Netherlands: I lived for a couple of years in what's called The Flevoland in Holland. It's one of the Dutch provinces and it's all land that was recovered from the sea. So, it's all under sea-level. One of the courses I played a few times out there had flags on every hole to show just how deep the water would be if it wasn't for the dams. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...