Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6319 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
EVERYONE came to play! I was very impressed with nearly all the players.

As far as the Ryder Cup Rookies, I was most impressed with AK, JB, Boo, and Poulter ( was this Poulter's second Ryder Cup??? ). I think playing the way they did, with the conditions of a hugely hyped tournament, they're going to be even better next year. Especially for Holmes. I think his confidence will be boosted a bunch.

Poulter was very impressive. I don't really care for some of the comments he's made, but golf is a game, athletes talk smack at each other. Even golfers. I guess it makes more sense when you can absolutely back up your words though.

We're definitely starting to see the next generation of great golfers.

I was NOT impressed with Phil and Sergio. Or maybe I should say, I was disappointed. I think Phil played pretty well along with AK, but his putting is still off. Sergio, well Sergio I think was affected by the crowd, same as Westwood. They played great mostly, but seemed to lose focus.

Posted
I take no offense to Poulter's behavior...at least what I've seen of him. He struts around sort of like a peacock and has fun.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Poulter is going to be the new Garcia for Ryder Cup. He elevated his game and earned more points than anyone else on either team.

This Ryder Cup also may give him the confidence to start winning consistently on Tour. I've never been bothered by his "style" - the guy is a marketing genius. You could always spot him instantaneously on the course, and he got attention without even being one of the elite players. Now, whether I liked his clothing choices from a personal perspective is a completely different matter. Anyway, I think Faldo saw something in Poulter that no one else did. That may be his Ryder Cup legacy.
The same could be said for Boo's behavior. He was getting the crowd involved and was creating a great atmosphere on the course. It was nice to see cheering and yelling rather than the stiffs with the little quiet golf claps.

Boo surprised me. I've never really cared for his "simple Southern boy" routine. And I've never bought it. He's smarter than he is letting on. I wish he'd just stop the dumb act.

But he impressed me this weekend. Also, how about Hunter Mahan? Only mistake all weekend was getting too excited after the long "Leonard-esque" putt on 17 to go 1 up. If he had stayed calm, he would have kept his drive on 18 in the fairway and would have won the match instead of halving it. But Mahan is one of my new favorites. I respected him for what he said about the PGA's management of the Ryder Cup, and he backed it up with his play. Leonard and Mahan were lights-out. So much fun to watch those two. And Mahan clearly learned something from Leonard (aforementioned putt that mirrored Leonard's 1999 Brookline putt.) I had almost forgotten what a phenomenal putter Leonard is. I mean, am I the only one who thinks of Ben Crenshaw when Leonard is putting? AK performed exactly the way I thought he would. Almost Tiger-esque (except for not recognizing when he had won the match - Tiger never lets any details slip, no matter how focused he is.) And watching AK and Phil was incredible. How nice was it to see Phil ditch all the Pelz over-analyzing and just play with his heart?

Posted
Very well stated, Harry.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Poulter is going to be the new Garcia for Ryder Cup.

I was thinking this as well.

This Ryder Cup also may give him the confidence to start winning consistently on Tour.

I'm not sold on that, but only time will tell.

Anyway, I think Faldo saw something in Poulter that no one else did. That may be his Ryder Cup legacy.

Yep, I agree.

Boo surprised me. I've never really cared for his "simple Southern boy" routine. And I've never bought it. He's smarter than he is letting on. I wish he'd just stop the dumb act.

I love Boo's act. Harry, I don't know where you are from, but "the dumb act" is something Southern people use to our advantage all the time. It plays right into stereotypes that many people hold. As we all know, It is usually a great advantage to be underestimated by the competition. Much the same as many intelligent, successful women have done in all walks of life.

When his act stops working for him he'll drop it.
Also, how about Hunter Mahan? Only mistake all weekend was getting too excited after the long "Leonard-esque" putt on 17 to go 1 up. If he had stayed calm, he would have kept his drive on 18 in the fairway and would have won the match instead of halving it. But Mahan is one of my new favorites. I respected him for what he said about the PGA's management of the Ryder Cup, and he backed it up with his play.

I agree 100%

Callaway FT-9 Tour I-mix 9.5° Driver (Fujikura Zcom Pro 65 stiff)
Mizuno F-50 15° 3w (Exsar FS2 stiff)
Bridgestone J36 19° Hybrid (Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff)
Adams Idea Pro 23° Hybrid (Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff)
Adams Idea Pro Forged 5-pw Irons (DG Black Gold stiff)Nike SV Tour Black Satin...

Posted
Harry, I don't know where you are from,

Texas, born and bread. And while I may not live there anymore, I will always be a Texan.

And the problem is that when someone with celebrity status buys into the dumb Southerner act, for whatever reason, it reinforces that stereotype to the rest of the country. To quote Parker from Highway 18, "Just because I talk slow doesn't mean I'm stupid." (I don't talk slow either, but you get my point.)

Posted
On the PGA tour most of the players are so serious. On the European tour, there is an air of gentility. It's ok for players to display their personality, especially at a Ryder Cup.

The Ryder Cup is a different atmosphere. Remember Ballesteros or Wadkins from the 80s.

Posted
I think Poulter is an incredibly talented golfer....but he is too much of a whiner and complainer for me. He seems to constantly go off on photographers and fans for "interfering".....I'm sorry, but i dont buy that stuff. If I can make a 10ft. putt with carts buzzing around me and my buddies laughing, then a PGA pro should be able to do the same even if he hears someone actually breath, or the soft click of a camera from 30 yards away. No debating that he is a great golfer, though.

  • Administrator
Posted
then a PGA pro should be able to do the same even if he hears someone actually breath, or the soft click of a camera from 30 yards away.

Especially if all the clicks are after impact.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Leonard and Mahan were lights-out. So much fun to watch those two. And Mahan clearly learned something from Leonard (aforementioned putt that mirrored Leonard's 1999 Brookline putt.) I had almost forgotten what a phenomenal putter Leonard is. I mean, am I the only one who thinks of Ben Crenshaw when Leonard is putting?

Leonard didn't make anything on Sunday.


Note: This thread is 6319 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.