• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Island Par

Shaft Lenght Reduction-will i lose distance

12 posts in this topic

I am having difficulty being consistent with a 46" shaft driver i recently bought. I hit a lot more consistently with 45" shaft lenght drivers i own.

As this is my first 46" shaft lenght driver, if i decide to reduce the dhaft to 45" will i lose considerable distance from the tee?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

if you cut it to 45 you will lose 7 yards at the most but become very accurate i personally think you should do it i only losed 4 yards but gained 6 fairways hit a round i am also just 5,6
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cutting the shaft will decrease head speed which will reduce distance, but not drastically. It will however alter the swing weight of the club. Try choking down on your club for a while and see what works best before you cut anything or swap out shafts.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the distance you are referring to; right and left, or length. I shortened my driver from 44.5" to 43.5" and lost maybe 10 yards in length, but gained 10x in accuracy. On Friday, I hit my driver on all of the par 4s and 5s. I was on the short grass 90% vs 70% previously.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only believe a longer shaft increases clubhead speed IF you are actually swinging it faster. If the shaft feels too long and akward you could actually lose clubhead speed vs. a shorter shaft. This is just a theory of mine with no scientific evidence whatsoever. I know I can go harder at a shorter shaft because the setup just feels way more comfortable.

And if you are hitting the center of the face more consistantly, your average drives will actually go up with a shorter shaft compared to average drives hit all over the face of a longer shaft driver. Plus you will be in the fairway more often. Longer shafts are best for extremely consistant ball strikers and those that count their longest drives and not their average drives as their driver length. Longer shafts are also great marketing tools. For some they will make a driver hit longer. For the ones it actually hurts, they will be back in a few months looking to buy a new driver.

Just don't forget to add some swingweight to the head to make up for the loss in swing weight form the reduction of shaft length. Otherwise you might end up with a shorter driver that you are still hitting all over the face because you can't feel the clubhead. I think a lot of golfs failed when experimenting with shorter shafts by skipping this step. And the loss in swing weight is only slighty due to the loss of part of the shaft weight itself. Most of the swing weight loss is due to the shortening of the fulcrum effect of the club (for a lack of better words). Grip down to the shaft on your sand wedge and you will feel how much lighter the head feels. This is just an extreme example to prove the point that a shorter shaft requires more head weight.

JMHO, Good luck!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remember that if you cut a shaft down at the butt end (the grip end) the flex will be the same, but if you cut it from the tip end it will get stiffer.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends...

i have a 45" SQ and a 44" 905R.

Now the SQ is a flat out bomber, but i really never felt comfortable playing it tot he full lenght and it always just felt akward.. so i decided to dick around with my EPIC and chopped it an inch so that the 905 played 44. It really does help, seeing as it and my Sonartec 3 wood are now the same lenght and only 5 degrees apart haha. but its much more accurate, and i am actually starting to pick up some yardage vs the superquad because i feel witt he shorter shaft i am more in control, and can take a better rip at it each time. plus i can still lay back a schoche and lay one in the fairway about 250 with annoying consistency now. well, maybe not all that annoying =P

Overall, im very happy i did it, i will probboly never play a 45 inch again. Plus, 46 inches is a real long driver to begin with, plus when you put taht with a 49 gram shaft, CoughBurnerCough your gonna be pretty off. Atleast i was.

Jaybird, i gotta think about taht one.. If you tip a shaft, i know it will make it stiffer, but if you make anything shorter, wont it become more stiff? i mean, isnt that just basic physics?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes. That said, I hit a pair of 280's + with a Sumo2 cut down to 43.75" yesterday. My ss is 90-100. I came out of my shoes to do it tho... Would I have hit it 295 with the stock 46" shaft? Who cares.

BTW.. I haven't noticed an increase in stiffness at all. I *know* it's there because physics says so, but I don't notice it. Cut mine from the butt end and think I *might* notice it more from the tip though.

Still trying to figure out if I notice the swing weight change or not. That said, Golfsmith now sells some cool colored "Weight dots" for the head that are virtually unnoticeable. Once you know the swing weight you can screw around with the dots and get a good feeling swing weight for *you*.

Good luck!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a club junkie. In August I bought the Hibore XLS, it was okay but it didn't chance my game upside down like I thought it would. In October I bought a 905 R at a close out sale. I love the look of it, but it still didn't change my game that much. Last week I took my old r7 quad and got it re shafted with a V2 cut down to 44 inches, and I love it. I'm more consistent, which means a few things. It means more fair ways, and a higher average drive. I may lose 10 yards on a perfect hit with the shorter shaft but I'm no longer hitting huge slices. I'm glad I did it, you won't regret it!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys, I guess I'll give it try. The driver I am talking about is a nickent 3DX square driver. Will switch the head to my graman ul640 45" shaft and give it a try.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no club guru, but I will say, that the longer the shaft the faster the clubhead speed will be based off of the same swing (greater arc, faster speed at the end of said arc) and if you are to hit it on the sweet spot then you should see greater distance with a longer shaft.

But, are you more likely to hit it on the sweet spot with a shorter shaft?

I would, but that is me.

Whatever you do, have somebody that knows what they are doing make any changes for you.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with mancest about getting someone to do the work on the club. I had a spare GBBII 415(actually have 3) that I cut down, so I wasn't going to be without a driver if I screwed up. Once I decided I liked the shorter shaft and it helped my driving, I took it to a club builder to have it fitted for me and reshafted. These results are from my range session this afternoon. I only took the driver and hit 42 balls. I used the Strike'nSwipe impact labels to check my clubface-ball contact. Usually with the longer driver I was getting about 20-25 balls in the center of the clubface. Today, 40 out of 42 were in the center and the other 2 were only slightly toward the toe. Now not all of these flew straight and long, but the spread is a lot smaller. The more I am hitting the driver, the more my distance is improving. Now that I have confidence in a driver, I can now work on my swing to gain more consistency and power.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries