Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm in the market for a new driver, and am looking for the best workability in one. I currently have a Taylormade Tour Burner 9*, and an Adams Redline RPM 10*5. You can't beat the Adams for distance, I have hit some absolute bombs with it, it just has very little workability. The Taylormade also has little workability, and is a good bit shorter on distance as well. I have yet to hit any of the Mizuno, Callaway or Titleist drivers. Any suggestions?
Next time they give you all that civic bullshit about voting, keep in mind that Hitler was elected in a full, free democratic election- George Carlin


In the Hoofer bag:
10.5* Redline RPM G5 16* G5 19* G5 22* MX 200, 4-6, MP-52 7-W Vokey 50*, Vokey SM 54*, 58* G5i flatstick IGNITE ball

Posted
I don't think it will be the G10...however, this stick will pull off baby cuts and fades at will....enough that you can bend it slightly to favor the contour of the hole. I'm not skilled enough to make it really work hard....some may be...but I suspect they are hitting a different head....like one of the Titleist.

I've certainly hit my share of big hooks and slices, too....but it was not my intent to do so.....argggghhhh
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
A strong 3 wood is the most workable driver! Find yourself a 12 or 13* fairwaywood and enjoy!!!

Whats in the bag?
Driver = Wishon Golf 949mc 9.75*/.5* Closed Face Angle
Fairway Wood = Wishon Golf 915 F/H 16* Square Face Angle
Wood Shafts = Wishon Golf Pro Flight EXP 85g Stiff Flex
Hybrids = Wishon Golf 331H 21* & 24*Hybrid Shafts = Wishon Golf GI335 Tour Weight 92g Stiff FlexIrons = Wishon...


Posted
I find my 905R to be a little left biased, but my 907 is pretty workable, so look into either the MP600, or a 907D2, or the 909's if you like spending money.

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...


Posted
I spent about 2 months of testing all the "tour drivers" because i can hit the ball with enough distance fairly easily, but my control was terrible. I tried the Cobra Pro S9-1 Pro, Ping G-10, Titleist 909D2, and the Taylormade Tour Burner. I was going to buy the Cobra and i went to the range with one of my buddies and tried his 909D3 with Proforce V2 65g Stiff and needless to say I bought one the next day. Hands down the most controllable driver I have ever hit. If price isn't an issue or you can find a good deal on e-bay like I did I would definately suggest getting the D3.

In the bag:

Driver: 909D3 9.5* UST PROFORCE V2 65 Stiff
Woods: :909F2 15.5* Matrix Ozik Stiff
Hybrid: idea A7Irons: Mp 62 4-Pw DG S400Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52, 56, 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2


Posted
In all honesty I think any club is as workable as the next, so long as you know what you're doing. That being said, If you want maximum workability [draw and fade] a wise choice would be a club with a square face with no offset and a shaft fitted to your swing. I've got an FT-9 Tour and can do what I want with it.

Callaway RazrFit Extreme 9.5 w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XHot Pro 15* 3Wood w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XTour 18* 2h w/S300
Callaway XHot Pro 4/5 irons w/S300
Callaway XForged III 5-PW irons w/S300
Callaway Forged 52*/58* Wedges
Odyssey 7 Versa 90
Callaway Hex Black Tour


Posted
A strong 3 wood is the most workable driver! Find yourself a 12 or 13* fairwaywood and enjoy!!!

a stong 3-wood by definition is NOT a driver... Most strong 3's aren't going to give you the same distance as a good driver... so why carry one when there are plenty of workable drivers out there.

In all honesty I think any club is as workable as the next, so long as you know what you're doing. That being said, If you want maximum workability [draw and fade] a wise choice would be a club with a square face with no offset and a shaft fitted to your swing. I've got an FT-9 Tour and can do what I want with it.

I would agree... I haven't found a driver that I can't make go both ways... but some are certainly better than others. The sqaure face helps... as will a slightly reduced MOI... and more compact clubhead, preferably with a neutral or slightly open face.

My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
In all honesty I think any club is as workable as the next, so long as you know what you're doing. That being said, If you want maximum workability [draw and fade] a wise choice would be a club with a square face with no offset and a shaft fitted to your swing.

Couldn't have said it bettter.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


  • Administrator
Posted
In all honesty I think any club is as workable as the next, so long as you know what you're doing.

That's true to a point, but I suspect you know it only goes so far or you wouldn't have contradicted yourself a little:

That being said, If you want maximum workability [draw and fade] a wise choice would be a club with a square face with no offset and a shaft fitted to your swing.

That's the key. Get fitted and find a club that's neutral. You can still fade an R9 set to "Left" with all the weight in the heel, but it's gonna be REALLY hard to do it consistently.

I had more trouble than I should have drawing my 907D2, but that's because I had to play the ball up a bit more than I like to try to eliminate some backspin. So get a driver and shaft that's fitted for your launch conditions (spin, angle, ball speed), doesn't have super high MOI (which has more to do with the CG being further back, reducing workability - this kind of eliminates most of the square ones), is as neutral as possible (might be the "Tour" version of some clubs), and looks good to you. Then swing away.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That's true to a point, but I suspect you know it only goes so far or you wouldn't have contradicted yourself a little:

Yeah, that's why I made that distinction. More for the average Joe golfer.

A few months back I was hitting balls on the range when a member approached me with one of these, 2008 Callaway Big Bertha Irons , and said to me that when he looked down on the thing he thought there was no way he'd be able to fade the thing, and asked me to try. Not only did I pull off a little baby fade, but I was able to hit a banana slice with it too. So yeah, anything can be worked. But some clubs will be easier than others...

Callaway RazrFit Extreme 9.5 w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XHot Pro 15* 3Wood w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XTour 18* 2h w/S300
Callaway XHot Pro 4/5 irons w/S300
Callaway XForged III 5-PW irons w/S300
Callaway Forged 52*/58* Wedges
Odyssey 7 Versa 90
Callaway Hex Black Tour


Posted
I can draw and fade my HiBoreXL pretty well.... most of the time it's a baby fade b/c that's my natural shot.... but if need be I've learned how to work it....i found it hard to work a "tour" driver...it made me think...wow that driver is much harder..even though it's only 2 degrees open....everything i hit wasn't as accurate as when i hit on the sim and range with my driver.
but i've tried this year's
hibore
tour edge xcd
the burner and burner tour
r9
the rapture.
last year's exotics cb2 tour proto

out of all of them.. loved the look of the rapture.. but found the sound annoying.
loved the feel of the exotics tour proto... but hit the burner the best....
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
you'll want a driver with low MOI, and a square face. I i were you i would try the r7 425 TP. I have the regular version of this driver, and its definetly workable due to its small size.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
...The sqaure face helps... as will a slightly reduced MOI... and more compact clubhead, preferably with a neutral or slightly open face.

I found taking a step back to a smaller head makes it much easier to work the ball. I have both a Titleist 905s and 983e, both do not have the heel weighting most clubs have today, so fading a ball is easier, which seems rather difficult with the larger 460cc heads that have alot of heel weight to help people keep it left, as most better players have no problem moving the ball left or, in my case, way left.

In the Titleist bag on the ClicGear 2.0:

PILOT: Titleist 910 D2 Axivore Tour Red

3 WOOD: Callaway 3-Deep 13*

Hybrid: TaylorMade RBZ 22*

IRONS 3-PW: Mizuno MP-32

WEDGES: Vokey TVD 54* SM5 58*K

PUTTER: Rife 2-Bar Blade

BALL: Penta 5


Posted
In all honesty I think any club is as workable as the next, so long as you know what you're doing. That being said, If you want maximum workability [draw and fade] a wise choice would be a club with a square face with no offset and a shaft fitted to your swing. I've got an FT-9 Tour and can do what I want with it.

I have to agree with this post. I believe that correct technique will allow a draw and certainly a strong fade with any driver.

I feel as if a lot of hackers would love the opportunity to say that they hit some of the new square drivers great, but they are "too straight" because it implies a high degree of precision and control. I have played a lot of courses and holes which favour a fade or a draw, but have yet to see one where a straightish drive is going to penalise you. Having said that, I would think that a 905 series Titleist fits the bill.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  • Moderator
Posted
I just got a Mizuno MP600 and that things is very workable. I played today and could hit a nice draw and a nice fade any time I wanted. It has been one of the better drivers I have had as far as being able to work the ball. I have never (I don't know why) owned a Titleist but I would imagine it is the same way. I agree with Ben...any driver that has a square clubface should get the job done.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.