Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Have you been professionally fitted?


Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Have you ever been professionally fittted?

    • Yes
      70
    • No
      91


Recommended Posts

Posted
I did a quick search and found a few threads about getting fitted, but I am curious to know who here has actually been fitted and did you notice an immediate impact?

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
no
always off the shelf
i have "fitted" myself for a driver shaft if that counts? haha!
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
My advice..don't get fitted until you have a decent game goin' for you (i.e. single dig handicap). Most irons are one size fit all except for really tall or short people. It's just a big hassel and if you change setup or posture you may be in trouble. So i mean it is a personal choice and more power to you if you do.

*Former High School Golfer*
*Playing at Cabrillo College starting Fall 2009*
* Taylormade R7 460 10.5 degree with ProForce V2 stiff shaft cut to 42"*
* Taylormade R7 TP 15 degree 5 wood
* Taylormade R7 TP 18 degree hybrid** Titleist AP2 3-PW w/ Project X 6.0** Titleist Vokey Design 52.10...


Posted
No, but i'm getting a new set of irons in the next couple weeks and i'm definitely going to get them fitted.

Lefty Golfer!
In my light stand bag:
R7 Limited Driver 9.5* Matrix Ozik xcon 5.5 Stiff Shaft
A3os 3 (19*) and 4 (22*) Hybrids Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum Stiff shafts
X-22's 5-AW Regular Flex Uniflex Steel Shafts X-Forged SW 56* & LW 60* 35" Studio Stainless Newport 2.5 ('04 version) with a...


Posted
No, cuz I hate having someone tell me what works best for me and I'm standard height, swing, grip, etc..so there is no need.

stand bag:

Driver: DDH 10*
Woods: DDH 3W-15*, 5W-21*
Irons: DDH 3-SWWedge: VR LW 60*Putter: VSL


Posted
Ha all no's so far.

I put no as well, because I don't count the few times I've hit off the launch monitor at Golfsmith or whatever as a fitting. I'd be interested to get a true professional fitting at a center with a good reputation some time, but for now I just do my own research about clubs, try hitting friends' clubs to compare, and I've even messed around with impact tape and stuff like that on my own.
Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Posted
I got fit for my first set, a not-name-brand set of irons from a club-builder in Orange County. I was barely swinging at the time, so it was mostly static measurements, but even once I got into the swing, the clubs set up well at address. I firmly believe that it is easier to get good at golf if you start with well-fit clubs and lessons. Considering the former is no more expensive - and in some cases, less expensive - than off-the-shelf, I don't understand why people don't do this.



When I got my MP-57s, I got fit by the Mizuno representative and I'm exceptionally glad that I did.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm standard height and my wrists are just about standard so there's no point in getting custom fitting for me...

In my bag:
'07 Burner (10.5*) Driver
Unknown model 3 & 5 Woods (next to get replaced)
Rescue (21*) Hybrid
Di7 4i-GW 56/08 Oil Can Wedge Rossa Blade Putter NXT Tour Balls


Posted
I've been fitted twice, and like I've seen written on here already, don't get fitted unless you have a decent and repeatable swing...

When I first started playing 9 years ago, I had what I thought was repeatable but it had it's flaws. When I bought my first set of clubs, I got fitted and the fitting made adjustments for those flaws. My first purchased set was 1/2" long and 2 degrees upright.

Fast forward a few years while still trying to improve my action and new flaws started to crop up. I wanted to get a new set of sticks, too, and so I opted for another fitting and results this time were standard length, standard lie.

I've bought one other set since then and didn't get fitted, just buying the standard set and I've had no problems.

..................
No brand loyalty at all!

Driver: Speedline 10.5*
Fairway woods: 905F 15* and Big Bertha 19*Hybrid: DWS 3HIrons: 2008 FP 4-GWWedge: Carnoustie 56*Putter: Zing Anser 2i


Posted
I haven't been fitted for all my clubs in the traditional since..i.e. lie angle, launch angle, height, club length, swing speed, angle of decent, ball backspin, sidespin, velocity, trajectory..etc

But I recently went down to Golfsmith and Edwin Watts to be fitted for a new shaft and to get a new hybrid and I did notice immediate results. With the launch monitor I was able to optimize my ball speed and trajectory with the tweaking of my swing and with the numbers was able to pick a shaft that best suited my driver and my swing.

Posted
I would agree that you should reach a certain level of playing before getting fitted but the same would be said about about a decent set of clubs.

I've seen a lot of people comment that they are standard height, etc. so they don't need to be fitted. Here's the thing, just because you are a standard height doesn't mean you have a standard swing. If you go to a good pro he will not necessarily try to change your swing but fit you so that your clubs are right for your swing (provided you don't have a total train wreck of a swing).

I am 5'11 and most clubs are designed off the shelf for guys 5'10 to 5'11, however I found that I had a problem staying down on the ball and would top or duff shots fairly often. When I got fitted the pro told me that I "stood tall" during my swing. Not a bad swing, just what was comfortable for me. He fit my irons and told me that the length is something he might usually see in someone who is 6'1 or 6'2. I immediately saw the benefits. A comfortable swing makes good contact now and I rarely top the ball. Also, adjusts to the lie angle, etc. helped eliminate my tendency to push right. I was amazed when he would hand me different clubs and say "this is going left" or "this one should be right" or "this one is going to go pretty straight" and be right every time. A good pro and fitting can make a world of difference.

If the pro just takes your measurements and doesn't have you swing various clubs and check you on a black board, etc. you need a different pro.

Slim 11
Driver: Cobra F-Speed 10.5*
3 wood: Cobra F Speed
5 wood: Cobra F Speed
Irons: Cobra 3100H/I 3-PWSW: Pixl 56*Putter: Monza Rossa MalletBall: Slazenger Raw Feel


Posted
I know a lot of people swear by it and I've dont it twice. It didn't help me at all infact actually I couldn't hit them at all. It could be one of those weird things where my swing just matches up with the off the shelf set fine.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
I know a lot of people swear by it and I've dont it twice. It didn't help me at all infact actually I couldn't hit them at all. It could be one of those weird things where my swing just matches up with the off the shelf set fine.

I am sure a lot of people end up pretty close or the same as a standard set. I am surprised that fitting would hurt you (I can understand not seeing a difference). Possibly your fitter just wanted to make changes to seem like he knew what he was doing or to charge you a little more (my fitting was included in the price of my clubs). I have friends who have gone to my guy and he told them they didn't need an adjustment, the standard was right for them. I think a lot depends on your pro.

Slim 11
Driver: Cobra F-Speed 10.5*
3 wood: Cobra F Speed
5 wood: Cobra F Speed
Irons: Cobra 3100H/I 3-PWSW: Pixl 56*Putter: Monza Rossa MalletBall: Slazenger Raw Feel


Posted
I have never been fitted either, so I am not sure I know a lot about the fitting process, but I didn't think that Height and wrist position was the end of it. Don't they see what your impact is and that weighs on what they do to the club. I would think that how the club impacts the ball is more important than how it sits at address.

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


Posted
I have never been fitted either, so I am not sure I know a lot about the fitting process, but I didn't think that Height and wrist position was the end of it. Don't they see what your impact is and that weighs on what they do to the club. I would think that how the club impacts the ball is more important than how it sits at address.

There are a lot of factors in fitting, but it also depends on your swing and your ability. They can't spend all day with you trying to see the one or two perfect strokes you put on the ball. Mostly they check your impact on a black board that will show how the club is contacting the ground. It will show if you are coming inside or outside, open or closed face, too steep or too shallow, etc. That is a big reason I don;t think you should get fitted until you are a semi-decent player. You don't need to be a single handicap but you should be able to make consistent, good contact and have a fairly repeatable swing. I would say if you are under a 20 handicap, it is worth it. Again, this is about the same point that I would say it is worth spending the money on a premium set of clubs.

Slim 11
Driver: Cobra F-Speed 10.5*
3 wood: Cobra F Speed
5 wood: Cobra F Speed
Irons: Cobra 3100H/I 3-PWSW: Pixl 56*Putter: Monza Rossa MalletBall: Slazenger Raw Feel


Posted
I would never have gotten fitted for anything if it wasn't for the fact that my friends dad is a major titliest rep.

R9 10.5 Aldila Voodo Stiff
S9-1 3W Stiff
Baffler 20 Degree
AP2 (3-PW) KBS Stiff
Vokey Design (52,56,60) Redwood


Posted
I would never have gotten fitted for anything if it wasn't for the fact that my friends dad is a major titliest rep.

Did it help you?

Slim 11
Driver: Cobra F-Speed 10.5*
3 wood: Cobra F Speed
5 wood: Cobra F Speed
Irons: Cobra 3100H/I 3-PWSW: Pixl 56*Putter: Monza Rossa MalletBall: Slazenger Raw Feel


Posted
Yes, my current set was fitted by Titleist and my club pro. And yes it has tremendously helped my game.

But, it could be just that I was playing a 15 year old set of Ram Fx2 (great clubs for their time) and now I'm playing AP2s.

I spent 2 hours with my club pro who fitted me with proper length, lie angle and shaft, for the Nike Split Cavity, Titleist AP2, Calloway X-22 tour, Cleveland CG7 Reds.

And honestly when I was tweaking the AP2s I could immediately feel the difference and see the results between an unfitted AP2 and a fitted one.

I would never, ever invest in new equipment without it fitting me perfectly regardless if I was a scratch golfer or a hacker.

Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.