Jump to content
IGNORED

9 Hole Rounds and Handicaps


Uthinkso
Note: This thread is 3800 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts



Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Tin Man

The 9 hole courses I play are short. Most greens are within 7 iron range.  Half of my clubs stay in the car.

How would I not end up with a low handicap that would make me a joke on a regulation course?

Do you know what the total yardage is or the rating?  As others have said the low rating will help some, but  I could see where a handicap index from primarily playing at a very short course may not travel well.  In other words, you may not get enough strokes at harder courses that you play.

The course has to be 1500 yards long (9 holes) at a minimum or 3000 yards for 18 to allow posting for a USGA handicap.  Anything shorter, and you would be limited to a "short course" handicap which are designated with a "SL".  This handicap would only be applicable at the short course where it was established.

According to an earlier post, the course has an official rating of 65.8/113 - so appears to be a legitimately rated course, not a short course.

I am curious as well about the total yardage though...

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think we're getting Jlanm and Tin Man mixed up, or at least I am.

Jlanm, I'm assuming those are 9 hole yardages.  Seems like a reasonable rating.

Tin Man, when you said you were hitting 7 irons on every hole, I wasn't sure if that meant from the tee or your second shot.  You probably meant your second shot.

I think I'm just confusing everyone.............

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


Originally Posted by Dormie1360

I think we're getting Jlanm and Tin Man mixed up, or at least I am.

Jlanm, I'm assuming those are 9 hole yardages.  Seems like a reasonable rating.

Tin Man, when you said you were hitting 7 irons on every hole, I wasn't sure if that meant from the tee or your second shot.  You probably meant your second shot.

I think I'm just confusing everyone.............


Oh, you're right, I was thinking they were the same poster.  I thought the "7 irons on every hole" comment was with respect to the course we already knew had the 65.8 rating for 18 holes. So I assumed those were second shots, not tee shots - since you knew it was *not* the same poster, you were right to wonder whether they were second shots or tee shots.

Good news is I don't think the confusion changes any of our answers... As you say, for Jlanm the rating is reasonable, and for Tin Min the yardages are reasonable.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


well..the math is making some sense to me, i understand how you arrived at the 22..now..to play better and lower it!

Thank you guys very much for your insight and help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It now makes sense.

I will go for an SL handicap.

The course down the street has some guys who have out aged their long games, but are deadly when short. The competition is there.

(I have completed the "out aged" part and am working on dangerous......deadly is my goal.)

Thanks Everybody!

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you signed up for the SCGA, then you can post your scores there. I am willing to bet the course would be listed and you can post 9 holes. After you submit xscores, it will calculate your hcp. I have seen a few of the executinve 9 hole courses listed with the option to post a scores for 9 holes.

Which course is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The Lakes at El Segundo, and the Hotel behind Marvel Studios.

Ones a knobby hill and the other a gully. I'm sure the Lakes are eligible. I have my doubts about the Hotel.

PS: The 7 iron bit is for those who only want to carry 3 clubs.

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Strange I just went to see if i could pick The Lakes on the SCGA site to enter a score and couldn't find it. There is a manual entry option and it should still work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm having trouble with the handicap, as I mostly play 9 holes, in fact only played 18 holes once so far this year.

My scores this year are as follows:

101 - 70.1/121

45 - 34.5 / 122

43 - 34.5 / 122

49 - 34.5 / 122

Originally I just put in 18 in golfshot, but tried to use their automated handicap system, and ended up with like a 36.4 or something, does that seem accurate??

How does the math work? Where does the differential come from?

What would be the most accurate way to assess a handicap given mostly 9 hole scores?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

I'm having trouble with the handicap, as I mostly play 9 holes, in fact only played 18 holes once so far this year.

My scores this year are as follows:

101 - 70.1/121

45 - 34.5 / 122

43 - 34.5 / 122

49 - 34.5 / 122

Originally I just put in 18 in golfshot, but tried to use their automated handicap system, and ended up with like a 36.4 or something, does that seem accurate??

How does the math work? Where does the differential come from?

What would be the most accurate way to assess a handicap given mostly 9 hole scores?


Plenty of answers out there (even in this thread) so...

Combine nine hole scores.

(Score - Course Rating) * 113/Slope * 0.96. There's your differential. Average the best 10 of the last 20 and that's your handicap index.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

I'm having trouble with the handicap, as I mostly play 9 holes, in fact only played 18 holes once so far this year.

My scores this year are as follows:

101 - 70.1/121

45 - 34.5 / 122

43 - 34.5 / 122

49 - 34.5 / 122

Originally I just put in 18 in golfshot, but tried to use their automated handicap system, and ended up with like a 36.4 or something, does that seem accurate??

How does the math work? Where does the differential come from?

What would be the most accurate way to assess a handicap given mostly 9 hole scores?

This should help get you started.  As noted the differential is:  the score you shot minus the course rating.  Take that number and multiply by 113.  Take that result and divide by the course slope.  Round to the nearest  10th.  .5 round higher

101-70.1 = 30.9
30.9*113 = 3491.7
3491.7/121 = 28.85
Differential is 28.9

When you combine 9 hole scores you add the course ratings together but not the slope.  The slopes get averaged.

For your first two 9 hole scores:


45+43 = 98
The rating would be 69.0/122

98-69.0 =29
29*113 =3277
3277/122 = 26.86
Differential is 26.9

Once you get 20 differentials take  the 10 lowest.  Compute the average of these 10.  Take that number and multiply by .96  This result does not get rounded  up.  Just drop any numbers after the 10th.  That's your handicap index.

To find out what your handicap is for a particular course take your  handicap index and multiply it by the slope of the tees you're playing and then divide the result by 113.  Round to the nearest whole number, .5 rounded higher.

Until  your reach 20 differentials you can start computing a handicap index with just 5 differentials.

If you have 5-6 scores  use the 1 lowest differential.
7-8 scores use the lowest 2 differentials
9-10 scores use the lowest 3 differentials
11-12 scores use the lowest 4 differentials
13-14..........................lowest 5
15-16..........................lowest 6
17...............................lowest 7
18................................lowest 8
19................................lowest 9
20...............................lowest 10


Once you have more than 20 scores, use the most recent 20 to get your lowest 10 differentials


If you want to know how what a "R" index is and how to compute it.......that's going to have to wait.



Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...

I'm reviving an old one here, but I've got a little twist and I didn't want to start a new thread on the same topic.

Yesterday, I showed up at 630am without a tee time.  Normally they have no trouble squeezing in a single, and I planned on playing two rounds.

They put me off the back and said when I come around the front they'll squeeze me in.  I shot a 46 and finished around 830.  Due to a tournament that started at about that time, they couldn't squeeze me on right away, but after a long wait I got back out there. I played the full 18, shooting a 40 on the front, and a 47 on the back.  Because of the delay, I didn't play holes 28-36.  So, do I post an 86 and a 47 or 46 and an 87?

The difference seems insignificant, but its my best score at my new home course.  Actually, an 86 on this course would also be either my best or second best round ever, per differential.

Facts favoring 86/47: I planned to play 36.  Throughout the first 9 hole round, I expected to follow it immediately with the other 9 holes.  I walk, and my feet were killing me on the last 9 (walked 36 the day before)--fatigue definitely set in more than usual so the first 18 holes i played are closer to normal fatigue levels.

Facts favoring 87/46:  The 18 consecutive holes, front then back, are logically connected.  The break between the rounds (about 2hrs) separates them further.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Post them as three separate nine-hole rounds. Or not. One stroke either way isn't going to make much of a difference.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

But then I don't have a course record. I'll take that as neither is incorrect and post my course record 86. :-D

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...

Going out to play 27 hole round today (last of the season I'm guessing) which is perfect because I have a 9 hole round that's waiting for a dance partner, I keep an unofficial handicap and the site I use doesn't compute 9 hole rounds.

I want to decide ahead of time which 9 holes I will use to complete the left over round so I don't get tempted to cherry pick to create the best round.

Can't decide which is better:

a) use the first 9 to complete the left-over and treat the following 18 holes as an independent round

b) play the first 18 as a whole round and use the final 9 to complete my left over

I'm thinking there are some score impacting factors such as not being in the groove at the beginning and/or fatigue at the end. I suppose it doesn't make a ton of difference, just wondering what other people do and if there is a protocol?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Going out to play 27 hole round today (last of the season I'm guessing) which is perfect because I have a 9 hole round that's waiting for a dance partner, I keep an unofficial handicap and the site I use doesn't compute 9 hole rounds.

I want to decide ahead of time which 9 holes I will use to complete the left over round so I don't get tempted to cherry pick to create the best round.

Can't decide which is better:

a) use the first 9 to complete the left-over and treat the following 18 holes as an independent round

b) play the first 18 as a whole round and use the final 9 to complete my left over

I'm thinking there are some score impacting factors such as not being in the groove at the beginning and/or fatigue at the end. I suppose it doesn't make a ton of difference, just wondering what other people do and if there is a protocol?

Heading out soon, unless someone chimes in with a compelling reason to do otherwise, I'll be combining my first 9 with the left over and treating the next 18 holes as an independent round. Wish me luck!

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3800 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, that makes sense. I was trying to wrap my head around that concept when I was writing my post.   
    • 78 today at Minnesott (36 front / 42 back) - a new first with an even par on the front.  A big day of up and downs for par.  Only 26 putts against 4 GIR and 5 nGIR.  Was a CPO (cart path only) day due to recent rains.  Overall game was on - until 18 where I was looking at having a first “no-sixes” and made a triple 7 (tee shot in the lake, 2nd tee in fairway, shot 4 approach to right of green pin high, shot 5 bogie on the green, long two putts for triple 7.  Still a solid round and new personal best. 
    • I believe that 76 bpms is the tour average (or somewhere around that). I think that's from taking it back to impact. I'm not 100% sure of exactly how it works since a typical pendulum is already moving when it starts going back. The putter on the throughswing ideally would work pretty much exactly like a pendulum though. To get the exact same time period from starting the putter back to impact, you'll have to accelerate it a lot faster on a longer putt right at the beginning until it gets to the speed it needs to be to make the putter move the right distance. Probably all way too much to think about while actually hitting a putt, but bottom line is I agree entirely that a metronome is a good thing to use if you're working on your putting tempo. As to the split between backstroke and downstroke, the tour tempo lot said 2:1 is the ideal. 3:1 for full swing. 2:1 for short game and putting. Whenever I go on a SAM I am about 1.7:1 I think and I can't for the life of me get my backstroke to be slow enough to get it to 2:1. Ho hum. Last comment - if you do have a perfect pendulum putting stroke and you have the ball slightly forward of the center of your stance, then the putter should be just starting to rise again at impact and with the way that pendulum motion works, it should be very slightly decelerating at impact, which I believe someone may have suggested once 😛 
    • Was going to chime in on Erik’s videos - they were and are solid teaching on better putting.  
    • I'm a big fan of the metronome. I forget what my actual numbers were, but something like 0.59 seconds: my backswings, regardless of the length of the putt, is 0.59 seconds (or 0.72 or whatever the actual number was). The period of a pendulum is determined by the length of the pendulum. So, to hit a putt harder, you take it back farther… in the same amount of time. So you have to swing it faster, and thus, it comes through faster. The putter head has to travel faster to travel farther in the same amount of time. Everyone tends to have a "beat" that they like. For some it's slower, and they have to make bigger backswings to make a putt go the same distance as someone like Brandt Snedeker. It also has a metronome IIRC. 😄 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...