Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5884 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yesterday I was looking in a local golf shops used section. I came across some good deals on Titleist 690 mbs and 695 mb. I know they are a bit hard to hit for my handicap(14), but i am going to practice and play about 4-5 times a week. As I am very keen on getting down my handicap. Anyway both have Dynamic Gold S300s. I was wondering are they that stiff? And Would the 690 MBs lose a bit of distance as they are 4 years old but groove conditions are good. I can get the 690mbs for €183($274) and the 695 for €325($485)
Also i am a student in high school and am doing physical training(Stegth) and yardages have been coming along nicely. Would I be able for the stiff flex?
My yardages PW 110 yards
7i 135 yards
5i 145-150 yards

In my X86 Bag:
Driver:909 D2Diamana Whiteboard
3 Wood: 909 F2 Diamana Whiteboard
Hybrid: 23 DegreeAldila NVS
Irons: ZB 2 Iron & 695 MB 3-PW S300s60 Degree: RAC Z TPS300Putter: iSeries(G10) AnserGolf Balls:(Practice)(Competition) Pro V1 '09


Posted
Yesterday I was looking in a local golf shops used section. I came across some good deals on Titleist 690 mbs and 695 mb. I know they are a bit hard to hit for my handicap(14), but i am going to practice and play about 4-5 times a week. As I am very keen on getting down my handicap. Anyway both have Dynamic Gold S300s. I was wondering are they that stiff? And Would the 690 MBs lose a bit of distance as they are 4 years old but groove conditions are good. I can get the 690mbs for €183($274) and the 695 for €325($485)

I know that Imperial gallons are bigger than US gallons, but I think yards are the same - unless you're hitting irons from the 1940s, your yardages make me think the S300s are bit much for you. When you can consistently hit your 7 iron > 165 yards (without having to swing outta your shoes) or if everything is a snap hook, then look at stiff shafts.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Can you explain the snap hook part of your response? I've found that over time, my ball flight has gone from a slight draw, to a really exaggerated draw/hook when i hit a poor shot. How does the shaft stiffness come into play?

I used to play 5 days a week and did so with my current irons since I purchased them back in the winter of 2007-2008. Could the shafts in my irons (AP2 Project X 5.5) really be worn to the point that they're negatively effecting my game? I also used to hit off mats all winter when I lived in NY. I suppose I'll look for any excuse That said, I recognize most times it's the Indian, not the arrow. I apologize in advance for the minor threadjack.

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


Posted
Can you explain the snap hook part of your response? I've found that over time, my ball flight has gone from a slight draw, to a really exaggerated draw/hook when i hit a poor shot. How does the shaft stiffness come into play?

No prob, ya I heard that as well off golf digest i think, and that was the reason of me checking the S300s before I pull the trigger

In my X86 Bag:
Driver:909 D2Diamana Whiteboard
3 Wood: 909 F2 Diamana Whiteboard
Hybrid: 23 DegreeAldila NVS
Irons: ZB 2 Iron & 695 MB 3-PW S300s60 Degree: RAC Z TPS300Putter: iSeries(G10) AnserGolf Balls:(Practice)(Competition) Pro V1 '09


Posted
Are you talking in metres or yards?
If your talking about yards leave the stiff.
If your talking about metres it's still close.

I hit my 7 iron 145-150m (159-165 yards)
I play with regular shafts but that's just me.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
Are you talking in metres or yards?

It is yards and as my distance is rising quickly i do really not know what to do as i can get there real cheap and dont mind a 5-10yard decrease now for a 5-10 yard increase in 1 or 2s year

In my X86 Bag:
Driver:909 D2Diamana Whiteboard
3 Wood: 909 F2 Diamana Whiteboard
Hybrid: 23 DegreeAldila NVS
Irons: ZB 2 Iron & 695 MB 3-PW S300s60 Degree: RAC Z TPS300Putter: iSeries(G10) AnserGolf Balls:(Practice)(Competition) Pro V1 '09


Posted
Would the 690 MBs lose a bit of distance as they are 4 years old but groove conditions are good.

why would they lose distance just because they are 4 years old? im not sure if i understand what you mean by that


Posted
I was wondering are they that stiff? And Would the 690 MBs lose a bit of distance as they are 4 years old but groove conditions are good.

if you would always think what if then i would say get them,and mine are just fine after being 4 years old


Posted
i hit my 7 iron 155 yards, and I use s300's....

I actually think my swing speed has slowed down since working on my tempo, and my ball flight has only improved by doing this. I really dont think s300's play that stiff...

Honestly, if you gave me an unlabeled shaft and had me hit the 7 irons both in reg and stiff, I honestly probably wouldn't feel the difference. as Im sure most people wouldnt.

Jim

In my Ogio Blade Stand Bag:
 

TaylorMade Burner 10.5*

Adams Insight BUL 15*
Taylormade RBZ 3H

TaylorMade RBZ 4-AW

Vokey SM4 54-11

Cleveland CG14 58 2 dot wedge

Ping Karsten Series Craz-E putter

Top Flite Gamer


Posted
Anyway both have Dynamic Gold S300s. I was wondering are they that stiff?

You need to realize that the DG S300 shaft...

* Is a fairly heavy shaft (127 gram average) - this slows down the swing speed * Has a high kickpoint - this gives a lower than average trajectory With your current distance, I would say the stiffs - especially ones designed for low trajectory - might be a bit much for you. I am 58 years old, and I went the other way this spring - from stiff shaft to regular. My last couple of years with stiff, I had noticeable loss of distance, and messed up my swing timing also. Keep up the strength training - work on flexibility also - and make your switch to stiff when you get above 150 yards on 7-iron distance. Also, when you eventually play in the British Open, put snaphook96 on your bag so the Sand Trap crew knows its you.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
There is a huge difference when you switch from regs to s300. Your whole game CAN go down tHe dump. The weight changes, trajectory changes, shaping shots. If I were you stick to tge regs until your 7 iron can go 150 without hitting it hard. And also your weight training I think it should be 70% flexibility and stretching and 30% weight training. To get more distance it's all about the coil, not how buff you are.


Keep working on the game man!

Driver: R7 SuperQuad S-Flex
3 Wood: SQ Dymo
5 Wood: SQ Dymo
Irons: Victory Red Blades 2-PW
Wedges: Victory Red 60 & CG10 56Putter: No Name brand


Posted
Yesterday I was looking in a local golf shops used section. I came across some good deals on Titleist 690 mbs and 695 mb. I know they are a bit hard to hit for my handicap(14), but i am going to practice and play about 4-5 times a week. As I am very keen on getting down my handicap. Anyway both have Dynamic Gold S300s. I was wondering are they that stiff? And Would the 690 MBs lose a bit of distance as they are 4 years old but groove conditions are good. I can get the 690mbs for €183($274) and the 695 for €325($485)

I believe that the s300's frequency out at 5.5 to 5.8.

Basically I agree with other posters who have said that your 7i yardage doesn't translate into a s300 well. OTOH, you are young, doing strength training and learning the golf swing. This in my mind suggests that your swing speed will increase. This will bring the s300's back into the mix. So I guess the question is do you want to keep play'n the s300 or go down to r300's? If money is an object and you know how to pull shafts, I'd say soft step the s300's once or twice. Also if you do that it has been my experience that DG's spines are all over the place, subtle to very pronouned, so I'd suggest spining them before putting them back into the heads--just my .02 cents.

Posted
I believe that the s300's frequency out at 5.5 to 5.8.

0.02 cents?

Anyway, you can usually pick up a set of vintage blades (e.g. MacGregors or even old Titleists) with R shafts - cheap like borscht!

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I believe that the s300's frequency out at 5.5 to 5.8.

Thanks see I have never much experiance with dg shafts barr a couple of shots with my friends tw blades with r300s.. I play N.S Nippon Pros in mine. Would I lose much distance with the stiff?

Thanks everyine who contributed

In my X86 Bag:
Driver:909 D2Diamana Whiteboard
3 Wood: 909 F2 Diamana Whiteboard
Hybrid: 23 DegreeAldila NVS
Irons: ZB 2 Iron & 695 MB 3-PW S300s60 Degree: RAC Z TPS300Putter: iSeries(G10) AnserGolf Balls:(Practice)(Competition) Pro V1 '09


Posted
Thanks see I have never much experiance with dg shafts barr a couple of shots with my friends tw blades with r300s.. I play N.S Nippon Pros in mine. Would I lose much distance with the stiff?

You wouldn't feel much of a difference with the distance.

It's the dispersion I'd be worried about.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
i would stick with the regulars and switch when you can hit a 7 iron 150-160.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
DG's spines are all over the place, subtle to very pronouned, so I'd suggest spining them before putting them back into the heads--just my .02 cents.
Are you serious? Could you tell the differnce between a spined and non spined club? I doubt there are more than a handful of people in the world that could.
My advice? Stick with the clubs you've got the now, spend £20 getting a fitting for irons, then you'll know exactly what to get. I used to use X100's on a set of 990s when I was your age (I should have had regular) and I managed to get down to 2 with them so don't listen too much to all the advice being put your way. It doesn't matter how far you hit it, its how well!

Posted
I found an interesting item when I was trying out various configurations of the new Mizunos.

It's called a Shaft Optimizer. Looks like a regular iron except it has this plastic box on the shaft (I am guessing it has a Thomson strain gauge or something similar) and it measures several different parameters of your swing and makes recommendations. For example, my parameters were:

Tempo: 4
headspeed: 88
Toe Down: 3
Kick Angle: 5
Release Factor: 5

Tempo and headspeed were then graphed and I landed between a s and xs as far as stiffness goes. Shaft recommendations were DG S300, PX 5.5, and KBS stiff. Went with the 5.5s as I had intended because my previous irons had 6.0s in them and they were a tad too stiff for me.

If you have a shop local that has the Mizuno fitting cart, give it a try!

Bill

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Note: This thread is 5884 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.