Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why are some people so hostile to square head drivers and woods? I understand that for a low handicapped golfer they dont make much sense due to their lack of workability, but for anyone who isn't lucky enough to shoot a 72 on a bad day, why would you reject a piece of equipment that enables straighter ball flight based on the fact that you dont like the shape or sound?

FT-iQ 10* driver
FT-i Squareway 3 Wood
X-22's Irons
X Series JAWS Chrome 56*, 60*
Zinc Dual Sided Blade Putter HX Hot Bite X-22 Stand Bag


Posted
For me it has a lot to do with confidence over the ball. I just don't feel confident with a square head and that leads to a less consistent swing for me.

Posted
To each his own. I have a square driver and I feel more confident with it than my last non square driver. Until that time I regularly teed off with a three wood.

Posted
To each his own. I have a square driver and I feel more confident with it than my last non square driver. Until that time I regularly teed off with a three wood.

i totally agree, find a head that you feel confident over then get fitted for a shaft. Confidence over the ball is one of the most important things to consider when picking a new club.


Posted
I hit one once it wasn't as good as my driver but the shaft when you waggled the club head moved 4 inches roughly so i recon it was the shaft

Posted
Depends on your home course too
Course iused to play with i could play with a square driver because its all open wide straight holes for the most part
the course i play now would be a nightmare because there are doglegs at the 270-280 and i'm hittng drives 295-310 and i need something that can move a bit

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


Posted
I have had both square driver and 3W (Callaway FT-IQ and FT-I). I bought these because they are very forgiving and very straight clubs. Even on mis-hits, they like to go straight due to the additional weight at toe and heel that you don't get on a "traditional" shaped driver. The square shape didn't bother me, but I can see where it would bother some. I actually am switching to a non square driver as my game has improved to a point where I want to begin to work the ball of the tee a bit more than the square clubs will allow me to. I am parting ways with both of these Callaways if anyone is interested - both in excellent condition.

Driver : ping.gifG15 10.5* Serrano Stiff
3W: callaway.gif RAZR 15*
Hybrids : adams.gif A7 19*
4- PW : mizuno.gif MP - 63
Wedges : vokey.gif50*, 54*, 60*Putter: cameron.gif Scotty Newport 2.5Bag: sunmountain.gif 2011 SunMountain C-130


Posted
I had the Nike SQ squared 3W, and it was a good club, but the shape just made is too hard to hit off the deck. It wasn't a problem of looks, just practicality.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well my 2 cents....

Personally don't like them at address, but I have no issue using one if it in fact helps me play better. I have played the Nike Sumo and and the Cally Ft-IQ...I didn't like them...nothing to do with head, just the results and feel.

Nike drivers sound like a tin can to me....I don't like the sound....in fact I hate the sound the driver makes, and that alone was enough to turn me away. I do have to say that they are not bad...I had decent results with it, and was able to do some shaping.

Cally's FT-iQ...I just could get anything worth while out of it..maybe I was just me, but I couldn't hit it for anything. That same day I tried Titleist 909 D2, D3 And Comp, a G10, a V2, a Mizuno Mx560 ( I think) and was getting good results form the Titleist and g10, but the V2 and FT-iQ were no good for me, and the Mizuno sounded like the nike, but louder....

All in all it comes down to player preference, I have friends that hate mallet putters because they lok massive and out of place, but for me, they out perform a blade.....
It's the indian, not the arrow! But it sure is nice to have good arrows!!!!!

Driver : r7 Limited 9.5* Matrix Ozik X-Con 5.5 (Reg) | Fairway: 906F4 15.5* (Reg) | Hybrids: DWS Baffler 3/R 20* (Reg) & Baffler Rail H 4-H 22* (Reg) | Irons: AP1 5-G (Reg) | Wedges: SW - SM56-10 & LW - SM60-04 | Putter:.....

Posted
I never thought I'd get a driver with a square head. I was a fan of the "traditional" rounded head shape.

I tried the Callaway FTIQ because I was having problems fighting a slice. I hit it so straight, the trajectory was ideal and loved the sound and feel.....so I bought it. It took me about two driving range sessions and I completely forgot it has a square head.

Doesn't take long to adapt to asthetics.

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Posted
I hit a driver straighter than a 3 wood, i'd prefer a square 3 wood. I know it's wierd by the way... I am working on it. The article about swing path has really helped, but now if it'd just get warm enough to work on it at the range i'd be happy.

909D2 - 10.5º
909 F2 3 wood15º
AP 2 3-PW PX 5.5
52º Black Nickle and 60º oil can Both Spin Milled
reg 588 56º White Ice Rossie Z Star Tour YELLOWSG3


Posted
. . . hostile to square head drivers and woods. . .

Does a 100% chance of not putting a square driver in bag constitute hostility? They seem fugly and awkward, but if you like them, fill your boots.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I have had both square driver and 3W (Callaway FT-IQ and FT-I). I bought these because they are very forgiving and very straight clubs. Even on mis-hits, they like to go straight due to the additional weight at toe and heel that you don't get on a "traditional" shaped driver. The square shape didn't bother me, but I can see where it would bother some. I actually am switching to a non square driver as my game has improved to a point where I want to begin to work the ball of the tee a bit more than the square clubs will allow me to. I am parting ways with both of these Callaways if anyone is interested - both in excellent condition.

I think this post really answers the use of square over traditional drivers. Use it till your gaming much better then move up. I looked at the Nike 5900 square a couple years ago, but like some I just couldn't get over the looks at address.

Driver.... Nickent DX Evolver V2 65 stiff /07 Burner YS6+ stiff .
4 wood..... Nickent 4DX
Hybrids.....Tour Edge Geomax 22* 25* 28*
Irons.....TM R7 6-P + AW,SW,LW
Putter.....Odyssey White Hot XG 2 BallBag.......Callaway ORG 14 A.L.I.C.E. Ball........Bridgestone e6 / Srixon Soft Feel...


Posted
I have the Callaway FT-iq in my bag now. The driver before this one was the FTi. I love them. They are easy to hit and very forgiving. You can work them however the draw is a harder shot to hit. Callaway improved the look as well as the sound with the FT-iq and the Fubuki shaft is great. It is also longer than the FTi. It did take me a couple of rounds to get used to the look at address but now I don't think twice about it. It helps me find more fairways so I could care less about look or sound.

In the bag.
Driver- Callaway X-Hot 10*
Woods- Callaway X2 Hot 15*
Hybrid- Callaway X-Hot 19*
Irons-Ping G20 4-GW  Wedges- Ping iwedge 56*,58*  Putter- Ping D67 IN   Ball-Callaway Tour-ix


Posted
Well i actully took a Square driver out for a test the other day, (not that im looking to buy a new one, just to see) So here is what i found:

Bit weird and new at setup, not bad though.
Horrible sound!
I could still work the ball quite well.
Launched to high.


So thats just what i think of square drivers, it's not that i don't like them, but im a real traditionalist, so i like stick with what i like the look of + Im quite a good driver of the ball, so ill stick with the norm pear shaped club.

Driver: 909D3 8.5* Diamana White Board X
3 Wood: MP 630 15* GRAFALLOY PROLAUNCH RED X
Hybrid: 909H 19* "Real" VooDoo X
3 - P: MP-68 KBS Tour Black Nickel X
56* 10 Wedge Vr60* 06 Wedge: VrPutter: Custom Made.Golf Ball: TOUR B330SI am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was....


Posted
Depends on your home course too

No you aren't and no you don't.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Posted
i have gotten used to playing my current driver which is not forgiving and is quite hard to work so as soon as i hit the titleist 909 d2 i had found a driver which outperformed mine in many areas. i have tried a nike square headed driver but i didn't have a change to find the right shaft so i was hitting moonballs with it. for me its about looks as well as workability so i think it's right for me to continue playing with a traditional driver.
i have no problems with people using square drivers, i just haven't had enough opportunities to hit them. as a matter of fact, some pros use them (justin leonard, glover, cink just to name a few)

Note: This thread is 5775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,638 3/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • It may not have been block practice, though, is one of the main points here. You may have been serving and from the same place, but you were likely trying to do slightly different things. It seems that would only be blocked practice if you were trying to hit the same exact ball hit to you to the same exact place in the far court. I'm not sure that's as random as if the ball that you're given to hit is at different places, too, but again…
    • I played tennis in college. I thought block practice was great for serves because you were starting the point and  you could easily adjust where you wanted to place the ball based off the same motion. I equate those to tee balls. I despised block practice for groundstrokes once you reached a certain level and your fundamentals were good. To me, hitting a 100 crosscourt backhands in a row was silly because I would never do that in a match. I needed to randomize it by hitting some deep, some angled, all with different speeds and spins. I share that same thought about iron play. Because we seldom hit the same approach shots hole after hole, I prefer to practice irons randomly. 
    • Wordle 1,638 2/6* 🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,638 3/6* ⬛🟦⬛⬛⬛ 🟦⬛⬛🟦🟦 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.