Jump to content
IGNORED

Cleveland Classic #1 Putter?


Note: This thread is 4447 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Anyone else use this putter? I picked one up today on sale, because I absolutely hated my Itsy Bitsy Spider. I couldn't make any putts with it, so I wanted to go back to a blade style putter and see if the extra feel would help me out, and this one was cheap.

I absolutely love this putter. It was an immediate improvement over the Itsy Bitsy Spider (for less than half the price). It has such a soft touch, I think I'll be keeping this one for quite a while, and drop some strokes on the green!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I recently tried the Cleveland Classic heel shafted that resembles Phil's putter.

I thought it was an exceptional value.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


almost bought one, but then found a rife for the same price and thought the rife had better feel for me

In my bag

Driver - c3 bullet 10.5 degree
Woods- c3 bullet 5 wood
Hybrids- 3dx 3 and 4Irons- 3dx 5-pwWedges- Purespin golf tour series gw,sw,lwPutter- antiguaBall - :taylormade: Burner TP

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tried one. I didn't really like it after the first couple "honeymoon" rounds. If I hit it anywhere towards the toe it was terrible, for me. Had to hit it from the alignment mark in towards the heel or I'd get a bad roll.

Not necessarily the putter's fault, as many seem to like it, but just didn't work for me.

Driver: i15 8* UST Axivcore Red 69S
3w: CB1 15* Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum 75s
5w: G10 18.5* UST V2 HL
3h: HiFli CLK 20* UST V2 Hybrid
4h: 3DX 23* UST V2 Hybrid5i-pw: MX-23 TT Dynalite Gold S300GW/SW: RAC 52*and 56*Putter: SabertoothBag: KingPin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've tried out the number 1 putter....I thought the ball came off the face really hot. I'm really interested in trying out the new cleveland classic bronze series (same putter, bronze heads with inserts) to see if that helps out the feel for me any. None of the stores around me seem to have any of those in yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...

Kind of late to the discussion,

But I bought a Cleveland Classic putter a few years back to replace my Odyssey White Steel # 1. My Odyssey had the ball coming off the face, just too hot.

I tried a Cleveland classic # 1 at local NOrthway 8 golf and loved this club. The face is soft, yet responsive. I compared the cleveland against every ping and scotty cameron in the building and still prefered the cleveland. And for $69 (and I had a $25 gift card) how could I go wrong. I replaced the grip with a winn mid-sized and never looked back.

The only issue I have is the club feels alitte heavy for a 34". However I have been unable to find a putter with such a soft feel, for the comparable price!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Cleveland Classics are great putters.  Theyd be a great putter at any price but the fact that they are so inexpensive is a huge plus, IMO.  Ive owned a few Cleveland Classics: a CC1 BRZ, CC2 Platinum and a CC3 Platinum and they were all good to me.  If this X-Ray Tau doesnt work out, I will likely end up with another CC1.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4447 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You’ve yet to propose anything else. And yet it was, and the rules tell you how to deal with it. Your question has been answered. The Committee can declare them GUR. I disagree with your assessment of common sense. 😀 And yet they didn’t really change this one. Looks like this is about wrapped up? “That Rule is So Unfair!” A Rules Geek’s Generalized Guide to Hot Takes and Overreactions | Rules Geeks I apologize for the length of this post. If I had more time I’d have written a shorter one. – Erik J...  
    • When you are penalized for hitting into the sand trap the penalty is having to hit it out of the sand, not out of three inches of water. A sand trap is not the same as a water hazard. A sand trap is not supposed to be under water. It is a unique condition caused  by weather and poor drainage. Most local leagues like ours allow the free drop in this type of situation, as long as there is no area in the bunker to legally drop. This is what I’m talking about, sometimes the official rules of golf don’t align with common sense. That’s why they are finally starting to change them. For example, when wind blows your ball off the green. That was a stupid rule. People being able to call the tv network to say they saw a players ball move. That was a stupid rule. I’m just saying, these are rules made up a long time ago, and it’s time to modernize them.
    • Consider it another way: normally, it's a two-stroke penalty to move your ball out of a bunker (unplayable). The ACC reduces it to just one.
    • No, hitting into a hazard that is supposed to be avoided and is designed to be penalizing is not the same as hitting it into the middle of the fairway.   You are penalized because you hit it into a hazard. Based on your logic let's say you hit it into a red staked penalty area and you could normally play it but it's in temporary casual water from rain. Would you expect a free drop from there too??
    • They could have declared it GUR, sure. It is. It's temporary water, and as I said before, an abnormal course condition (ACC). That's what rule 16 is about — ACCs. No, a bunker ≠ the middle of the fairway. You are penalized because you hit it into a bunker. As for the rest… let's stick to the topic. Yep.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...