Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5677 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I played with 3 golf balls today.
Top Flite XL, Pro V1, Pro V1x
All in perfect condition.

Distance:
Top Flite and Pro V1x went around the same distance V1 was slightly behind.

Accuracy:
Now here's a thing a lot of people forget. If you play with a softer ball you'll not only get more backspin but also more sidespin.
The top flite was the most accurate for me.

Spin:
Pro V1 did 1 hop and stop from full wedge shots, V1x rolled out a bit more and the Top Flite ended up 5-10 feet away from the pitch mark.

Durability:
V1 and V1x were pretty bad after only 9 hole, the Top Flite looked nearly brand new.

Overall:
V1 and V1x aren't what they're hyped up to be. Yes they spin more but that's it, They get destroyed after 9 holes and accentuate fades/draws.

I'd happily play with a Top Flite XL instead of a Pro V

What do you think?

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The Pro V1 might not suit you, but that doesn't mean it don't suit others.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
While you mght be looking for every extra yard you can get, and just want to hit the ball as straight as possible, some of us might not need an extra 10 yards and prefer to have a more responsive ball for our short game. Plus once you have a decently consistent swing, there are lots of situations where being able to work the ball is much to your advantage. Personally, i just think TopFlites and most two piece balls feel rock hard and i hate putting and chipping with them.

-Gibby

Posted
While you mght be looking for every extra yard you can get, and just want to hit the ball as straight as possible, some of us might not need an extra 10 yards and prefer to have a more responsive ball for our short game. Plus once you have a decently consistent swing, there are lots of situations where being able to work the ball is much to your advantage. Personally, i just think TopFlites and most two piece balls feel rock hard and i hate putting and chipping with them.

I also use them mainly for the short game,top flites e.t.c are just like rocks.

aeroburner tp 10.5 stiff
superfast tp 2.0 3 wood stiff
Halo 25 and taylormade tp 19 degree hybrids
miura cb 202 and wedge
tp 52* wedge, tp 56* taylormade spider mallet putter


Posted
yea those top flights are like rocks. chipping with them its like you hit a peice of metal. Good driving balls though. Pinnacle is the same, good for driving but are like rocks.

Posted
While I agree a lot of what you say James, I have to disagree overall. I hit the ball really hard and can spin anything with a full shot. So from tee to green, I would have no problem with a Top Flight. Provided of course that they actually go a similar distance off the tee for me. The main reason why I use a Pro V is the spin you can get on partial shots and on chip shots around the green. That is where the scoring is done, so that is where I need to get the most out of the ball.

The last time I played I faced a 40-50 yard shot to a two-tier green with the hole in the back. I was able to carry to the second tier, the ball takes two hops and stops dead on the second. That just isn't going to happen with a Top Flight.

As far as them getting beat up, I don't really care. That just goes with the territory.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
I think there is a good amount of misperception over balls like the ProV1 and V1x (as well as others). If you struggle to hit fairways off the tee, this ball really shouldn't be in your bag to begin with.

For a mid handicap, balls like the bridgestone e6 would be a better fit. For better players who aren't as concerned with reducing sidespin, the Pro V1, B330 series, etc offer control around the green that distance balls cannot match.

For better players, being able to get up and down around missed GIRs is crucial to scoring. This is where the tour-level multilayer balls excel. A mid-level player would benefit from a high spin ball in these situations as well, however, they'll likely add strokes off the tee due to poor accuracy.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
To be honest, I find the whole "It spins less so is more accurate" statements to be the same hype as "adjustable drivers straighten wayward shots."

If a shot has side-spin, it has side-spin because of issues with clubface angle / swing path... and no piece of equipment is going to correct that. I seriously doubt that even the "straightest" equipment is even going to do much to mitigate the above mentioned swing flaws.

I can play any piece of equipment and range from pretty good to embarassingly poor, so it makes little difference in the end what I choose.

Thus, I choose equipment based on feel more than anything else; and rock hard, two-piece distance balls don't feel particularly nice to me.

Posted
To be honest, I find the whole "It spins less so is more accurate" statements to be the same hype as "adjustable drivers straighten wayward shots." If a shot has side-spin, it has side-spin because of issues with clubface angle / swing path... and no piece of equipment is going to correct that. I seriously doubt that even the "straightest" equipment is even going to do much to mitigate the above mentioned swing flaws.

I'd disagree. You're absolutely right that if you put sidespin on a ball due to swingpath it ain't going straight. However, if your golf ball choice puts 50% more spin on a shot, that's not just backspin, and your ball will travel even more wayward (but maybe into the next fairway if you're lucky for a clean lie!).

And as one who plays an adjustable driver, I disagree also that equipment doesn't make any difference, at least if your misses are fairly consistent. Tweaking my Nickent Evolver 4Dx to 1* closed has almost eliminated my fade, and now my driver flight is almost dead straight, resulting in 5-10 more yards. I'd agree if you miss all over the place equipment isn't going to help much though; but if you always slice your driver, an offset or "draw" driver will probably help. Yes it's a quick fix, but for those without the time for tons of lessons and just want to go out & play it may be a lot more preferable.

Driver: Cleveland Classic 270, 10.5*
Fairway Woods: Adams Speedline LP (3 & 5)
Hybrids: Wilson Staff Fybrids 21*, 24*, UST V2 stiff
Irons: Callaway X-20 Tour, 5-PW, Rifle Project-X (flighted) 6.0
Wedges: Cleveland CG15 DSG 52* & 58* +/- 56* Niblick

Putter: Yes! Amy


Posted
I like the Pro V alot myself. But will also play a Top Flite XL in a heart beat. Tee too green they are simular of of my clubs. I like the Pro V more with pitching and chipping. But I like the Top Flite more with my putter.... because of the louder sound.

Posted
The Pro V1 might not suit you, but that doesn't mean it don't suit others.

I think if more people took the time to objectively evaluate different balls like the OP did they would be really surprised by their result. The average player simply does not have the game to differentiate between balls. Take the print off the outside of the ball and there would go 90% of the incentive to play specific balls.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
I'd love to have the time to try a bunch of balls out, but I usually just try a dozen at a time. I recently got the Titleist NXT Tour and really like them. I get the spin I want around the greens and the distance of a two-piece. Try em out...and the price isn't to bad either. If I could afford it, I'd play the new Srixon, I've heard its amazing.
Whats In My Hoofer Bag

R9 460 9.5 degrees
909 F2 15.5 degrees
909H 19 degrees AP2 4-PW (Rifle Project X 5.5) Spin Milled 52, 56 & 60 Degrees Studio Select Squareback 2 Pro V-1 Favorite golfer: Zach Johnson

Posted
I will not play most Top Flites purely because putting with them is comparable to hitting a rock. Simple.
What I Play:
Wilson Mini Stand Bag | PING G10, 10.5°, Proforce V2 HL S | PING G5, 15°, 18°, Aldila NV 75 S | PING G5, 19°, Aldila VS Proto By You 80 S
Mizuno MX200 4-PW S | Ping Tour W 50/12 X | Ping Tour W 58/TS X | A selection of putters, all 35.5 inches.

Posted
I'd love to have the time to try a bunch of balls out, but I usually just try a dozen at a time. I recently got the Titleist NXT Tour and really like them. I get the spin I want around the greens and the distance of a two-piece. Try em out...and the price isn't to bad either. If I could afford it, I'd play the new Srixon, I've heard its amazing.

I agree with you. For the price, the performance of the NXT Tour is pretty tough to beat.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I play a Pro V1x because of the greenside spin and the trajectory that is more suitable than a Pro V1 (at least for me). However, I disagree when people say that it will only last 9 holes. That is simply not true as I've played my current ball for exactly 36 holes. I've hit a couple of full wedge shots which leave groove marks on the ball but I think I'll still play it until I lose it. It could be that I'm more accurate (with my swing), but I've never been able to play a ball for 18+ holes without losing it and I'm averaging 36 since I started playing with the Pro V1x. I might not be as picky with my ball as most people who will throw it away after 9 holes but I will definately stop playing the ball when I can tell that the extensive usage is affecting its performance, otherwise i'll keep on playing it.

Posted
i have 27 holes on my prov1x and its still going strong with 3 brand new wedges in the bag this year one being a 64 degree spin mille vokey that i hit 2 60 yard shots with and this ball is still fine

driver. taylormade tour burner tp ust avixcore tour green 75 x
3 wood 909 f3 13* voodo xnv8
3 hybrid adams idea pro vs proto 95x
irons 3 no 4 5-pw nike cci forged blades
gap wedge nike sv tour blacksand wedge cg14 56* 14flopadopolous vokey spin milled 64 7putter scotty cameron classics newport...


Posted
i have 27 holes on my prov1x and its still going strong with 3 brand new wedges in the bag this year one being a 64 degree spin mille vokey that i hit 2 60 yard shots with and this ball is still fine

You should take the plastic shrink wrap off your new wedges. ;)

Seriously, I can't seem to get an entire 18 holes out of a ProV1/V1x without scuffing one on an approach. I'll still play them when I can afford to do so however.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I've found the ProV to be the least durable of the tour golf balls. Try a different brand.

Note: This thread is 5677 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.