Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
misty_mountainhop

Reflections on the Wilson FG Tour ball

4 posts in this topic

Thought I'd write a few thoughts on some recent experimentation with the new FG Tour ball from Wilson. Having seen the specs and noted the price point (~£21/$30) I thought it sounded like a ball that would be worth a bit of research with the Summer on the way.

I currently play either the Bridgestone B330-RX or the 330-RXS; both of which are excellent balls. They're mooted for slower swings but I like them a lot even though I'm probably supposed to play the B330-S on Bridgestone's fittings. I particularly like the softer feel for chipping/putting. That said, I have tried at one time or another most of the "tour" balls, the exception being those from Callaway.

I love the (in?)famous ProV1 but they're over-priced (IMO) and a I find a lot of the other equivalent balls don't have the durability that they should have given their prices.

So. I purchased a dozen FG Tours and have been using them the last week or two; sometimes alongside another "tour" ball during practice. Here are some of the observations:-

Driver:

I have no idea what my SS is really but a typical decent drive with no adverse conditions might average out at ~270 yards this time of year. The FG Tour was a very decent ball off the big stick; long without pulling up any trees so like most other "tour" balls I guess. I found it pretty similar to the ProV1, albeit with a slightly softer feel; not too mushy though. Trajectory was a nice mid-flight and somewhat lower than I was expecting (not sure why!); I've not had one balloon on me so far either. Decent carry with reasonable roll out. Not the straightest ball if you put a bad swing on it but that can be useful feature and a bad swing is a bad swing - no technology is going to save it.

Fairway woods:

Decent off these. My current fairway wood/shaft combination (Geek DCT w/ UST Proforce 75S) tends to give a lowish, penetrating flight whatever ball I use and the FG Tour is no different. Nice feel.

Long Irons:

Actually reasonably decent off these. No real trouble getting the ball airborne. Found the ball to be pretty workable when needed; after one cut tee shot (accidental!) which finished behind a tree, I was able to hit a really nice, big fade with a 3-iron around the tree onto the fringe of the green. Also able to hit a decent draw when required.

Mid-Irons:

Nice, mid flight. Good feel. Ball really shone with these. Reasonable stickability hitting into the putting surfaces.

Short Irons:

Exceptional, for me at least. Genuine "one hop and stop" behaviour with anything from the 7-iron down. Real fizz off some of the shorter irons at times when required. Mid-high flight. It's worth saying that in the week or two I was testing these we have had no rain and that there has been negligible for the ~2 weeks prior either. Courses are running fairly firm at the moment and all the greens I've been playing in to are pretty unyielding.

Putter:

Loved the ball off the flat stick. Quite soft feel which dovetails well with my insert-free Scotty.

Chipping:

I like a softer feeling ball for the short game and this fits the bill nicely. Quite similar in feel to the Bridgestone B330-RX but spins better.

Feel:

As the reader has probably gathered, I prefer a softer feeling ball but this is where some people may be put off using the FG Tour. To me at least, it's one of the softer feeling "tour" balls out there (softer than, say, the ProV1) and if you like a firmer feel off your irons/chips/putts it probably won't be for you.

Durability:

Another area where this ball shone. One ball was still good enough from the point of view of cover durability to still be in use for 56 holes. For one 18 hole round I was deliberately hitting the shorter club (and hitting it hard) when faced with a decision between two when approaching the green. Sometimes this meant really hitting all out with a GW or SW; not the most accurate(!) but the cover really stood up to the mistreatment. Far better than most other "tour" balls I've used.

Cons:

Well, there had to be some I guess. A minor con is that the cover, which is brilliant white to start with, dulls somewhat quite quickly. Not a lot, it's just noticeable. The ball may also be too soft in the feel department for some people, especially those that like the ProV1x/Z-StarX/B330 type of ball. The one major potential drawback however is this - on the 56th hole with one ball, it cracked. Not a cut in the cover, a proper crack in the ball. Now, 56 holes with the same ball is pretty good and to be fair it was getting a bit beaten up by now anyway but was definitely still playable. However, in addition to this one that I cracked a friend has told me he's cracked two himself but not sure after how many holes. Seen mention on GolfWRX of a similar instance as well; wonder what Wilson have to say on it? Not a deal breaker yet but worth keeping an eye on it.

Summary:

Good enough, especially at their price, to replace the Bridgestones in my bag as my ball of choice this Summer but will keep an eye on major structural failures. Wilson have a very good ball here but whether it will get the exposure it perhaps deserves is something I doubt.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

great review
not sure if that was you on wrx commenting on the ball cracking, BUT i have read that over there too
thats a lot of holes w one ball, but cracking shouldnt happen

i have heard good things about this ball for sure
I think Wilson Staff is making a BIG comeback
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review, where have you seen them at £21? I haven't seen them for less than £29.99.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review, where have you seen them at £21? I haven't seen them for less than £29.99.

I got them at £21 from

best4balls.com . Went back there the other day to order a few more dozen and they're now £24.99/doz. or £23.99/doz. for 3 or more dozen. When I got them they were £19.99/doz. for 3 or more. Free shipping on 2 dozen or more I think. Shop around; quite a few online sellers doing them at under £29.99/doz.
great review

Wasn't me at WRX. I read it before I bought them but didn't take it in until I cracked one myself and went back to make sure I didn't imagine it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Yeah i think you make a good point. it might be easy to dial it back if you have a solid full swing, but i don't think a half swing is the same as a chipping swing ya know. and i think you're absolutely right, there is a little bit of a turn in the half swing as well. that is what i alluded to earlier i think. it was just the amount to focus on a full turn vs. 3/4 turn/ vs. half turn.  That is so true as well. I could stand to limit some difficult second shots, and potential drops from a hazard. I actually didn't think about this that much. The other thought i have on this is the feedback from the distribution of practice, is that whether i am in position at the top of the full swing or not, my mind is able to get the club face back to the ball to at least compensate for being out of position and get the ball out in play, meaning that the practice itself( not the outcome of perfect practice) is not always as beneficial although it can have more benefits in its mastery! Where as the half swing, if you are not in position at the top of a half swing, it is very very difficult to compensate and get back to the ball, while not as much improvement, the improvement is easier to come by i would think. The swing really does have to be very precise to even be able to make solid contact. So that is the dilemma I see in placing more emphasis on one or the other. Ill revise my thinking and say that they are both more so equally important. for every full swing, there needs to be a 3/4 swing as well as a half swing so that you can still make sure to keep good position throughout the entire swing. But that we also match up the benefits of different types of practice with their ease of mastery and what that is dependent on. I think i will see where that philosophy leads. start to practice them equally as much and see how the improvement goes. It is always great to hear this feedback to help me revise my thoughts on the golf swing. appreciate it @DaveP043
    • Well it is not as simple as just throwing my leg up. It would be more of a result of increased momentum of my turn. I do try to catch the ball on my upswing  and hope to carry it through.
    • I don't think you would want to do it on purpose.  Meaning like @MRR stated you don't want to do it consciously as this involves different muscles and memory patterns and will probably throw your swing off.  I'm not sure that any of these guys realize they are doing it.  Obviously they have seen it while watching themselves, but I don't think its something they were trying to do for extra power.  Bubba Watson does it too, so its not just the "vertically challenged" that do it they are just swinging at 120+mph so that's the result of it.
    •  If Donald Ross didn't visit the site of a golf course when asked to design it, what process did he use to design the golf courses? Did he required any sort of geographical information, like a survey? Here's an excerpt from a letter he wrote to Ponkapoag:
      "I will require a general plan of the property on a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet and contours at five foot intervals to be supplied by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. After the course is laid out I will submit a general plan of the whole layout and also individual plans and specifications for each hole. Mr. Walter B. Hatch, my Associate...expects to call on you..." In the case of Ponkapoag, he did visit. However, the letter gives you some sense of how part of that process worked. ......................................................
          How would you describe his philosophy when it came to designing a golf course? Ah, one could write an entire book on that alone. There's a large chapter on that in the Ross book (I did another book on how they transformed the barren wasteland of Pinehurst into a dreamworld previously: amazon.com/author/chrisbuie)
      He tried to incorporate all the natural features of the land. He tried to accommodate a wide variety of playing levels. He wanted thinking/strategy to be part of the experience. There are many, many different parts to how he approached design.
      Basically, he tried to make his designs as invigorating and intriguing and enjoyable as he could. ......................................................
       Did he actually visit the Lucerne area to see the course or was this a "postcard" design?  And are there very many Donald Ross 9 hole courses remaining?
      I don't think there are an abundance of 9 hole courses. In the appendix of my book there is a complete list (as we know it at this time) of all his courses. One of the items noted is how many holes he designed at each course. Regarding Lucerne, have a look here and tell me what you think and we'll discuss further:
      http://givenmemoriallibrary.net/vex/vex1/67EEF659-E134-4E4C-8C8E-397028601766.htm That is from the Tufts Archives in Pinehurst, by the way. It is an organization absolutely worth supporting.
      http://giventufts.org/tufts-archives You can find information on many of the individual courses here:
      http://givenmemoriallibrary.net/vex/vex1/toc.htm  
    • Now THERE is a VLOG! I just wanted to bump this thread for a few reasons: To get it going again. I want people to consider vlogging their rounds this season. It's fun, and editing can be fun (and it can be pretty painless, especially once you get good at it). To point out that we have a new VLOG award! It's not been awarded to anyone yet, but you can find it here: https://thesandtrap.com/awards/category/2-site-awards/. To earn this badge you have to have completed 3 VLOGs and posted them here. VLOGs should be at least seven holes, since that's what counts for a nine-hole round posted for handicap. To encourage people to post VLOGs of OTHER people playing. It doesn't just have to be us. It can be like the above. I think the Newport Cup applications have led to some really nice VLOGs already. Let's see some more!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Judah Ben-Hur
      Judah Ben-Hur
      (55 years old)
    2. Kalnoky
      Kalnoky
      (41 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon