Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jfrain2004

Open club face drill?

13 posts in this topic

HAve been doing some analysis of my swing and have figured out that my fade is due to an open clubface as opposed to an out to in swing plane. Ball starts straight and then veers off right. If I exagerate a closed clubface at setup I can get a perfect straight to draw ball flight.
Question is how can I tell my hands to get the club closed at impact? I would think that if it's a timing thing then it's probably costing me some club head speed too and hence even more yardage.
What drills can you reccomed to correct this? I have read stuff on rotating my grip to the right to get the club closed at impact but that is more of a band aid than a proper fix.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

HAve been doing some analysis of my swing and have figured out that my fade is due to an open clubface as opposed to an out to in swing plane. Ball starts straight and then veers off right.

That's wrong. If the ball starts straight and curves to the right, your clubface was close to square, but your swing path was out-to-in.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, The initial direction of the ball is determined by the direction of the clubhead. In to out swing path will produce a ball flight that starts right. Out to In will start the ball Left. How the ball flies after that is determinde by the side spin on it, left side (or right side spin, which in is put on the ball by the open/closed club face.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HAve been doing some analysis of my swing and have figured out that my fade is due to an open clubface as opposed to an out to in swing plane. Ball starts straight and then veers off right. If I exagerate a closed clubface at setup I can get a perfect straight to draw ball flight.

As was said above, you're incorrect. If the ball starts straight and curves right, it's impossible to not have an out to in swing path. A lot of beginners and even lower handicap amateurs try to rationalize their slice as "a fade" that they hit with an in to out path, but it's so rare that it's hard to believe without evidence. Out to in club paths are very common, even on the PGA tour, many players hit with an out to in swing.

If the club path is inside out or straight, and the ball starts straight or left, it cannot turn back to the right under any circumstances, ever.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, The initial direction of the ball is determined by the direction of the clubhead. In to out swing path will produce a ball flight that starts right. Out to In will start the ball Left. How the ball flies after that is determinde by the side spin on it, left side (or right side spin, which in is put on the ball by the open/closed club face.

Nope. Knowing and understanding the ball flight laws are crucial to analysing a shot and figuring out what is causing it.

There is no point in arguing really, this is a proven fact. If you are still not convinced, read the material on these pages: http://thesandtrap.com/playing_tips/ball_flight_laws http://thesandtrap.com/forum/threads...-Flight-Thread
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When I used to have a big problem with hooking the ball, I posted some swings on swing academy. The analysis all said that it was impossible that I was hooking the ball, because the face was clearly open at impact. But the wise observer knows that people who hook the ball usually have an open face at impact, and people who slice it usually have a square or closed face at impact.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Food for thought. Jack Nicklaus' clubface was "open" at impact and I believe he faded the ball to 18 Majors. GDIB
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Food for thought. Jack Nicklaus' clubface was "open" at impact and I believe he faded the ball to 18 Majors. GDIB

Jack Nicklaus was a push fader. So was Ben Hogan. Their clubface was open to their stance and swing path but, relative to the target, was aimed LEFT.

The OP has an over-the-top move.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Jack Nicklaus was a push fader. So was Ben Hogan. Their clubface was open to their stance and swing path but, relative to the target, was aimed LEFT.

Finally, the cavalry has arrived.

I've wondered about that a bit. My pro here says Hogan actually hit a very mild draw as his stock shot, but he would very often hit the fade he was so famous for. I didn't think that sounded correct, I had always heard Hogan hit a push-cut. Trevino is a good example of a push-cutter who swung in to out and hit a fade. Look how far left his feet are aimed! Davis love, on the other hand, has a straight to slight outside in swing that at times can become a vicious pull. Who on tour swings out to in? I think K.J. Choi does. Miguel Angel Jimenez does, I think Vijay does too.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw some clips of Kenny Perry on TV one day from his win at The Memorial. Back then, he hit a fade. I saw his ball starting left, thinking "Oh no, pull", but then it came back. Today, he's hitting big hooks.

If OP need some help, I suggest posting a video.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nope. Knowing and understanding the ball flight laws are crucial to analysing a shot and figuring out what is causing it.

The only concern I have with that first video is that the initial launch angle which is only one component of the end result. I don't have any info on the frictional coefficients of the club/ball interaction but the spin imparted on the ball will have a much larger long term effect than the initial face vector.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That video is meant to demonstrate that the old ball flight "laws" are wrong, nothing else. Of course, how much the ball spins sideways is crucial to the end result. I don't think anyone can calculate it accurately, but by experimentation, you can get a good idea. Using Trackman or similar equipment can probably help there. A degree or two at impact can cause a huge difference to the end result.

Knowing that the ball starts 85-100% along the club face angle is important to know. Using that information to analyse a shot, we can tell what happened. The OP says his ball starts out straight, but curves off to the right. So, we know that the club face angle is close to square. Being able to see the correct launch angle is of course impossible with the naked eye, and the ball will move off it a bit, depending on the swing path angle. But if the ball starts what looks straight to you, the club face is close to that angle. His ball curves to the right, so the swing path has created sidespin on the ball, which can only happen by the swing path angle being open to the club face angle, which essentially is left of the target. The reason for it is where you have to start to fix the problem. Could be that he is aiming his body left, without knowing it, or he could be coming over the top, which is pretty common.

How many degrees the swing path is out-to-in doesn't really matter. If the ball curves 20 or 40 yards to the right is not important, we know the swing path is wrong and have to work on it. By getting the swing path closer to square, and keeping the same club face angle, the ball will start going straighter. Once you get a better swing path, being in-to-out, in-to-in or out-to-in, you can start working on changing the club face angle at address to hit different shaped shots. You can play good golf with any swing path really, but a slight in-to-out is generally adviced.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • These are myths that I hear a lot. Some are just eye rolling trivia but some can hurt. 1. Tour pros continuously vary their shot shape based on hole demand. Not true. They have one predominant shot shape they play almost all the time. Only when in jail or extreme condition do they actually try anything out of their comfort zone - which is smaller than most folks think. 2. Tour pros are like swing doctors. They know everything there is to know about the golf swing. Nope - they are simply phenomenal listeners and executors. 3. You must understand the swing in it's entirety to learn and become better - Yeah, good luck on that path.   4. To have lag just hold the angle of the shaft to forearm until impact. - Lag is a result of good mechanics and club position and path. Can't force it. 5. You must have a superlight grip pressure (2-3 on a scale of 1 to 10) to hit good shots. - While white knuckling is just bad, you do need more grip pressure than you think.
    •   The problem is the twitter length version, get it as close to the hole as possible, is easy to read as, hit the longest club.  Really the argument in LSW (backed by stats), is around a multi-faceted risk assessment.  Simplifying less than the twitter version, hit it as far as possible without bringing "too much" risk into play.  The long version is basically a law of total probability argument, where you assess the probability of various outcomes with each current shot choice, and weight them by the average shots to hole out given each outcome, and choose the lowest. For example, you're sitting at 250 on a par 5.  You go through the potential outcomes of an 8i and 3i and estimate average shots to hole out from each: on target, slightly off target, chunk, blade, in jail, in hazard, open look but super penal rough, OB, whatever.  Then you think about the chances of these outcomes, and calculate the total expected score from each choice. The point in LSW is that you can't go through a bunch of equations for every shot, but if you're accurate about your average shot dispersions across clubs, then the typical bogey or better golfer is often overestimating the increase in risk from going for the longer shot, and underestimating the decrease in expected number of shots to hole out from getting it closer. The rule of thumb is that if there's not something in the layout that is a big risk at the longer distance but not at the short one – so in your case lateral hazard or big fairway thinning or big fairway bunker or much or penal rough or the like that starts at 75 yards out – then generally your lower expected total score is from hitting the longer club.  The strokes you lose when you do hit an errant long iron but wouldn't have hit an errant short iron are more than made up for by the strokes you gain from having an approach half as long when you don't hit an errant shot. Of course, it's always case by case and player by player.
    • I've been working on changing that for two years!
    • If this is true, then club fitting would be purely entertainment also and make no difference.  We could all use different clubs every time we played with no measurable effect on our score.  I'm not so sure all the time, money and effort that has gone towards studying the benefits of club fitting and developing custom club programs and fitting carts and training techs how to conduct a club fitting session would have been spent if it's all just "entertainment". Now, will there be a huge difference between the e6 and e7 for the average player?  No.  They are both 3 piece distance balls with the same type of cover, so the differences are not huge.  Noticeable, but not huge.  The difference between an e6 and a Pro V1 though will be dramatic.  And the number of players that played the Pro V that have been recommended the e6 are in the tens of thousands.  Not only is there a difference in the performance of those balls, but when you factor in the tendencies of the player the results can be substantial.  If a 10-15 yard gain won't have any affect on the average player's score, then you wouldn't mind if you had to give up 10-15 yards of distance off your drives and 5-7 off your irons, correct?  How would it affect your score if you had to tee off 25 yds  further back on every hole?  I'm guessing it would cost at least a couple of shots. Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon