Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Side note and totally off track here;

I wouldn't say they're unattractive per se, but you bring up a good point. I prefer boobs to be in proportion to body size. Unfortunately too many women have been conditioned to think we men want women with big breasts and as a result undergo unnecessary breast enlargement surgery. I like boobs as much as the next guy but unlike beer and cars you can overdo them.

My Implements of Destruction (carried in a Hoofer Lite bag):

DRIVER: Big Bertha Diablo 10 degree draw, Aldila regular flex
FAIRWAY WOODS: G2 14 degree 3 wood & 17 degree 5 wood
IRONS: S59 3-PWWEDGES: M/B 54, 58, & 60 degree PUTTER: I Series Anser 4 (or G5i Anser, Anser 2F, or original...

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Shanks, i think the only reasonable solution is right in front of your nose... 3-some obviously, life is to short to to only have one!!

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  


Posted
Shanks, i think the only reasonable solution is right in front of your nose... 3-some obviously, life is to short to to only have one!!

I've actually been offered that by a girlfriend. Everytime I'd make a suggestion on one of her friends to invite as a third, she'd give me this shocked and accusing response, "you think she's hot?!"


Posted
Now I know why I don't wander into the Grill Room very often. Misogynist Central, apparently.

And I'm sorry, Shanks, but I've seen you in your videos, and I could do without the thought of you naked or the thoughts of the type of women who'd sleep with you (at the same time?) sans clothes, too.

I need to take a shower. Wash this feeling off my skin.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I've actually been offered that by a girlfriend. Everytime I'd make a suggestion on one of her friends to invite as a third, she'd give me this shocked and accusing response, "you think she's hot?!"

I've been asked to be in a threesome once... you think I would of jumped for joy, but when it came down to it I freaked out and said no. I guess I'm not one of those guys

And no, women are not as shallow as men. I've known too many ugly dudes with hot chicks, mind you none of them were fat and they are all cool guys.
Now I know why I don't wander into the Grill Room very often. Misogynist Central, apparently.

You think this is bad you should hear what chicks say in a girls only conversation.


Posted
Guys who think being fat means anything are probably guys who can't get women. The basic fundamental truth is that women are attracted to your personality, not your looks (well, to a degree). I've dated many very attractive women, and many not so attractive women, because, to be honest, I don't care that much about looks either.

Posted
You mean they actually make low maintenance women these days?

Yes they do ...... you just deflate them and store them in the cupboard till next time.


Posted
There is one thing that will help you attract hot women even if you're not a great looking guy..............money

BING BING BING WINNAH

Then again I got Money-Looks-HockeyPlayer Ruggedness;; I got a GF and I think that causes more girlies to come to *talk*.... Swinging a big driver helps too boys
 Driver:callaway.gifBig Bertha 460cc 10* Hybrids: adams.gif A7 3-4H  Irons: adams.gif A7 5i-PW
Wedges: cleveland.gifCG 12 50*, CG 14 56*, CG12 60* Putt Putt:odyssey.gif White ICE Tour Bronze 1 Putter

Posted
Yes they do ...... you just deflate them and store them in the cupboard till next time.

If only they were self cleaning, we'd never need another thread like this ever again.


Posted
If only they were self cleaning, we'd never need another thread like this ever again.

I wish that it was that simple. Problem is, I do want kids one day, and heck, I like sleeping with ladies, so this type of stuff is going to happen again and again. No big deal, all part of life. I imagine when you're married, there's a whole secondary bunch of crap to deal with.


Posted
I wish that it was that simple. Problem is, I do want kids one day, and heck, I like sleeping with ladies, so this type of stuff is going to happen again and again. No big deal, all part of life. I imagine when you're married, there's a whole secondary bunch of crap to deal with.

No ....... there is just crap to deal with


Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.