Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

left arm

keiko

By keiko
in Instruction and Playing Tips

 Share
Note: This thread is 5675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

keiko Established Member

keiko

Posted
Posted

Watching many who struggle, I notice most if not all have no clue how to use the left arm since most are right handed and think somehow the right side is most important or at least they allow their right side to control the swing.
For those who have striking or directional problems, check out your left arm and see if it is straight-not rigid-on backswing and straight-not rigid-at impact. You may find it is not.
When the left arm is allowed to free wheel it or when it is ignored, there is an early bend on backswing and chicken wing at impact.
Just my two cents worth.


Paradox Great Member

Paradox

Posted
Posted
I think its important for people to understand that the left arm isn't supposed to be stiff. A little bending in the left arm, specifically in the backswing, will not kill you. Bending at impact will always cause problems, though.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


  • Moderator
TN94z Super Member

TN94z

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted
I used to have the chicken wing on my follow through. It is actually something that was hard to tell I was doing without seeing it on video. It causes a wide variety of issues in ball flight. Not to mention, it looks terrible on video. My teacher (who I like for his brutal honesty) said "Man that hurts me just looking at it." I busted out laughing when he said that.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

saevel25 Incredible Member

saevel25

Posted
Posted
It doesn't matter, there are players who are left dominate in the swing, some are both, some are totally right side dominate, you can play golf either way.

Do not keep your arm straight in the backswing, only 5% of the tour pro's keep it totally straight, keep it at what ever is relaxing for you.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: :titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

CarlSpackler Incredible Member

CarlSpackler

Posted
Posted
I think that keeping the left arm completely straight causes a lot of tension. I use the feeling of my right hand gently pulling my left arm to the top of the backswing with my forearms "banded together".

I also discovered "the dreaded chicken wing" last year on video. I fixed it by swinging with a glove tucked in my left arm pit.

seavel - Good to see a fellow Daytonian on here. Send me a PM is you want to play some time.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1

HytrewQasdfg Dedicated Member

HytrewQasdfg

Posted
Posted
I think its important for people to understand that the left arm isn't supposed to be stiff. A little bending in the left arm, specifically in the backswing, will not kill you. Bending at impact will always cause problems, though.

I'm sure that is why the OP's comments contained this line:

check out your left arm and see if it is straight-not rigid-on backswing and straight-not rigid-at impact.

Take a few minutes to look around at any driving range, and you'll see plenty of people (probably the majority) that allow their left arms to bend 30, 45, or even 90 degrees on the backswing. These are probably the poor souls the OP was referring to. The last thing they need in their head is a swing thought that says "don't keep you arm too straight." That's just going to reinforce their excessive arm bending.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Paradox Great Member

Paradox

Posted
Posted
I'm sure that is why the OP's comments contained this line:

No kidding? I never would have guessed thats why he said that! God, thanks so much for pointing that out or I never woulda known. MY point was that...even a less than straight arm in the backswing is not going to hurt a swing, but bending at impact always will. Thats why I said "...isn't supposed to be stiff.

A little bending in the left arm, specifically in the backswing , will not kill you..."

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


sean_miller Incredible Member

sean_miller

Posted
Posted
No kidding? I never would have guessed thats why he said that!

I didn't get that from the OP either. I assumed he was promoting less right arm dominance, which is probably a good idea for some people, but not everyone.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • iacas
      Mizuno Jpx One Driver & Fairway Woods

      By iacas · Posted

      Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • M2R
      Mizuno Jpx One Driver & Fairway Woods

      By M2R · Posted

      Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • coachjimsc
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By coachjimsc · Posted

      Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • boogielicious
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By boogielicious · Posted

      Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • iacas
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By iacas · Posted

      Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept