Jump to content
IGNORED

Shorts On the PGA Tour (Updated 2013, 2016)


Note: This thread is 1905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

39 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the PGA Tour allow its players to wear shorts during tournament rounds?

    • Yes
      2
    • Yes, with stipulations
      18
    • No
      27


Recommended Posts

Jesper Parnevik instantly came to mind,

For me it was Duffy Waldorf and Kevin Stadler.

Bury me with a golf glove in my pocket - just in case!


  • 4 years later...

So do you think male pro golfers should be banned from wearing shorts during competition? I can't think of one logical reason for shorts to be banned for men in competition. We know pro girls can wear them. What are your thoughts?


That's because woman's legs are easier to look at

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter




Originally Posted by Kieran123

That's because woman's legs are easier to look at



well yes I like to look at womens legs over men but thats not a logical reason.




Originally Posted by RedFox999

I can't think of one logical reason for shorts to be banned for men in competition.


There isn't a logical reason, except for tradition and professionalism.  I don't think in this day and age that it would be that big of a deal for most people, but I am sure the folks at the Masters would never let it happen.  I do recall seeing some high level USGA amateur events that allowed shorts and it never struck me as odd that the players wore them.  I wear shorts 98% of the time except when it is below 50, like in my picture.  That was a cold day.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Rad Tour 16.5* | Dark Speed 21* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey SM10 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1 | Vice Pro+




Originally Posted by TourSpoon

There isn't a logical reason, except for tradition and professionalism.  I don't think in this day and age that it would be that big of a deal for most people, but I am sure the folks at the Masters would never let it happen.  I do recall seeing some high level USGA amateur events that allowed shorts and it never struck me as odd that the players wore them.  I wear shorts 98% of the time except when it is below 50, like in my picture.  That was a cold day.




yea Im pretty sure the PGA tour for men is the only tournaments where no shorts is a rule, and I think European tour. AM's are allowed to wear shorts




Originally Posted by RedFox999

well yes I like to look at womens legs over men but thats not a logical reason.


The money to put golf on TV comes from advertisers. Advertisers know that they will lose a large percentage of their target market (those buying Cadillacs, Viagra, and investment plans) if they fail to project a professional image. Advertisers allow shorts on women golfers for exactly the same reason (more viewers).

Bill


I predict this Tour rule will fall within the next few years.     For years golf was dominated by classic clothing with wools and cottons and classic styling, but we now find athletic fabrics are pretty much dominating at the Tour level, and the cut and graphics in shirts are getting farther away from that classic Hogan-like image.     As we see this trend go further and have more pure athletes come on Tour, I'd expect the Tour to eventually follow suit and change the appearance from being a "sportsman" to an "athletic wear".     But hopefully some decorum will still remain and we won't see the outfits following the style trends of the NBA - I really don't want to see the long baggy hip-hop shorts and guys covered with tats.




Originally Posted by RedFox999

well yes I like to look at womens legs over men but thats not a logical reason.


It's not?

Oh.....

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter



Originally Posted by sacm3bill

The money to put golf on TV comes from advertisers. Advertisers know that they will lose a large percentage of their target market (those buying Cadillacs, Viagra, and investment plans) if they fail to project a professional image. Advertisers allow shorts on women golfers for exactly the same reason (more viewers).


They allow the pro women to wear shorts because it will draw more viewers, I doubt that is the reason haha. I think that would be the opposite of professionalism and go into sexist or whatever




Originally Posted by RedFox999

well yes I like to look at womens legs over men but thats not a logical reason.



But as illogical reasons go, it's a really good one!


Men should be allowed to wear shorts if they want.  The fact that women are allow to and men are not is sexist.  The problem is you have a handful of stuffed shirts running the PGA who dont think that shorts look dignified, so shorts are banned.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S




Originally Posted by RedFox999

They allow the pro women to wear shorts because it will draw more viewers, I doubt that is the reason haha. I think that would be the opposite of professionalism and go into sexist or whatever

You may have misread my post. Advertisers want men to wear pants because they'll get more viewers if the men look professional. Advertisers want women to wear shorts because they'll get more viewers if the women look sexy. That may be sexist but it's the way the world works - it would be naive to think otherwise. Sure, some fans of women's golf watch for the golf, but I don't think they're in the majority.

Originally Posted by TitleistWI

Men should be allowed to wear shorts if they want.  The fact that women are allow to and men are not is sexist.

Not necessarily. Is it sexist that at a formal occasion men don't wear shorts but women can wear shorts or a skirt? It's simply a matter of what the cultural style dictates.

Originally Posted by TitleistWI

The problem is you have a handful of stuffed shirts running the PGA who dont think that shorts look dignified, so shorts are banned.


Can't argue with you there, but again, I think it comes down to advertising dollars.

Bill


I don't think they should be allowed. It's how its always been and how ti always should be. You don't want to wear a skirt to a job where you have to wear dress pants do you?

There will never be a correct answer to this, but lets be honest, it will never effect any of us here, so what difference does it make?


One thing no one pointed out is the fact that this is their job it's not a saturday morning group. I don't know about most of you but I certainly could never show up at my job wearing shorts because it's not a professional look. The pga requires them to wear pants because they are professionals plus with the newer fabrics out there they don't get uncomfortable. I could care less if they wore shorts or not but it's definitely never going to happen. One other thing saying it's because of a "handful of stuffed shirts running the pga who don't think that shorts look dignified, so shorts are banned" isn't a great point. I mean how many companies in the US or anywhere must be run by stuffed shirts since none of their employees can wear shorts. Also just clarify I do wear shorts when I golf...

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 



Originally Posted by clubchamp

One thing no one pointed out is the fact that this is their job it's not a saturday morning group. I don't know about most of you but I certainly could never show up at my job wearing shorts because it's not a professional look. The pga requires them to wear pants because they are professionals plus with the newer fabrics out there they don't get uncomfortable. I could care less if they wore shorts or not but it's definitely never going to happen. One other thing saying it's because of a "handful of stuffed shirts running the pga who don't think that shorts look dignified, so shorts are banned" isn't a great point. I mean how many companies in the US or anywhere must be run by stuffed shirts since none of their employees can wear shorts. Also just clarify I do wear shorts when I golf...



Well the big difference here is we are talking about a sport, not a office job or whatever. Pro tennis players play tennis as their daily job but wear shorts, basketball same. I play many sports and on the golf course I get just as hot and sweaty as playing other sports.


I wear shorts playing golf during warm weather myself.

On the other hand, I think the PGA players should not wear them. I used to think differently until I saw a few episodes of "Playing Lessons from the Pros", and some of them were wearing shorts.

I believe one of them was Anthony Kim. Just seemed to look bush league.




Originally Posted by RedFox999

Well the big difference here is we are talking about a sport, not a office job or whatever. Pro tennis players play tennis as their daily job but wear shorts, basketball same. I play many sports and on the golf course I get just as hot and sweaty as playing other sports.


I agree but basketball (they have to wear suits to all their games), baseball, soccer, and football all have leagues that require them to wear uniforms. I'm guessing tennis players could wear pants but that would be rough with all running and change of direction. My point is much like any office job everyone has a dress code and the part of the pga's dress code is pants.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Note: This thread is 1905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
    • I would definitely attend if my calendar allows.
    • Finland: I've played Mid-Night Golf in Finland. Really cool. I looked at the schedule for my week out there and I saw that we were teeing off at 9PM... Feels weird, 9 PM tee time. But it was really great. We finished well after 1AM and sat around and drank on the golf course terrace. It was cool. It's really easy to loose track of time when the sun doesn't set.  Here's a picture of me in Finland hitting my approach on the final hole. It's roughly 1:30AM in this photo.  Egypt: Another cool experience was playing golf in Egypt. The entire course is sand. The greens are called browns, cuz they are just sand with oil poured on them and pounded down a bit. Your ball gets kind of oily when you putt, but the caddy cleans it for you after each hole. You carry around a little piece of fake grass (maybe 2 foot square) and place your ball on it each time before you hit. That is except when you go into a sandtrap. The sandtraps are just areas marked off where you don't get to use your little piece of astro-turf. Sometimes they are dug down a bit to make a bunker, sometimes not.  Spain: No special events or anything, but I played a bunch of golf in Spain in the mid-1990's. At that time Spain's economy wasn't doing the best and Europe hadn't quite switched to the Euro. So Spain was using the Peseta. The country of Spain has some incredibly breathtaking courses. (incredible scenery in general) But because of the conversion from the dollar to the Peseta (If memory serves it was 150 to 1), I got to play them for what I remember as being incredibly inexpensive prices. Gorgeous country and really nice people.  Holland or The Netherlands: I lived for a couple of years in what's called The Flevoland in Holland. It's one of the Dutch provinces and it's all land that was recovered from the sea. So, it's all under sea-level. One of the courses I played a few times out there had flags on every hole to show just how deep the water would be if it wasn't for the dams. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...