Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Choked down driver =


Note: This thread is 5597 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
In my round yesterday I found that if I choked down on my driver and swung "easy", I not only was way more accurate, but I actually picked up distance. My previous grip was with the butt of the club about .5" beyond the heel pad of my grip. I was yet again spraying the ball, but I made the decision to continue hitting it, and see if I could work it out.

I wasn't having any luck, until I accidentally choked down on the club. I hit a nice long straight drive and I was like WTF?!? I looked down at my grip and saw that it was choked down about an inch (meaning 1.5" of club past heel pad). I'm not sure how I got there, but I'm glad I did. I made the mistake a few times during the rest of the round of not gripping down on it, and the result was either a monster hook, or gigantic slice.

When I focused and gripped down, the ball went straight... EVERY TIME! I even hit my first 300+ yard drive. About 265-270 carry rolled out to 308 per Google earth.

In the bag
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
Fairway: Launcher 2009 17*
Irons: X-18r 4-SW
Gap Wedge: CG15 52*Wedge: X Tour 60*Putter: Crimson 550Ball: E5


Posted

Anthony Kim always chokes down, on all his clubs actually. check out the pic below with his driver, you can clearly see he is choked a good 1.5 inches or so.

Sergio garcia does it as well, but I'm not sure if he does it with his driver, definitely with irons though, about 1 inch.




Posted
Isn't AK a short guy to begin with?

 

In my Mizuno Aerolite IV Stand Bag:

Driver: Titleist 910D2 (9.5°, RIP Alpha 70S)
Wood: Titleist 910F (15°, RIP Alpha 70S)

Irons: Mizuno MP-68 Irons (3 - PW, C-Taper S+), Mizuno MP-33 2 Iron (C-Taper S+)

Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled (56.11 - Bent to 54°, 60.07 Tour Chrome, C-Taper S+ DSS)

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 (34")

Ball: Titleist Pro-V1x

GPS: Garmin Approach g5

Most useful training aids (for me) that I use: Tour Striker Pro 7 Iron, Swingyde, Tour Sticks alignment sticks, Dave Pelz Putting Tutor


Posted
He's 5'10" (177cm). Not very tall, but not very low either.

Either way, the fact that he choke down on his clubs and still compete in the top of the PGA Tour should be sufficient to tell us that if it works, it works, no matter what style you have.

It is strange how choking up just a little bit makes the swing a whole lot easier.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm 5'10" as well and a few days ago I was having a bit of trouble with the driver at the range and I figured I'd choke down and was pleasantly surprised how well I was hitting the ball. At first I felt like I was cheating myself because I figured I would lose some distance, but I was a lot more consistent.

What's In My Golf Bag:

  Nike Machspeed Black 10.5* callaway.gif Diablo Edge 5 Wood, callaway.gifDiablo Edge 4 Hybrid
callaway.gif 5- Pw Big Bertha Irons Graphite Shafts
vokey.gif52* 8* Bouncevokey.gif56* 8* Bouncevokey.gif60* 7* Bouncerife.gifHybrid Tour Mallet


Posted
I started doing this every drive and have noticed along with s&t; practice a much cleaner drive. It still isnt perfect but losing a bit of length helped alot. Everybody commented on how I would technically lose distance....Its hard to lose distance when you never knew what that was to begin with:) I am a consistent 225-250 yd drive now. Sometimes I'll flub a shot, but its the percentages have definitely flip flopped from the beginning of this year.

09 Burner driver
3-pw Dci 962 irons
54-11 gw
Backstryke 2 Ball putter


  • Moderator
Posted
At first I felt like I was cheating myself because I figured I would lose some distance, but I was a lot more consistent.

No choking down and not hitting the sweet spot will not gain any distance over choking down and hitting the sweet spot more times than not.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I started doing this every drive and have noticed along with s&t; practice a much cleaner drive. It still isnt perfect but losing a bit of length helped alot. Everybody commented on how I would technically lose distance....Its hard to lose distance when you never knew what that was to begin with:) I am a consistent 225-250 yd drive now. Sometimes I'll flub a shot, but its the percentages have definitely flip flopped from the beginning of this year.

Yeah the "you'll lose distance" argument is a common one. Maybe for someone who hits it dead flush almost every time, like a tour pro. But I think for the average joe like me that hits it all over the face of the driver on any given day, I'm likely to either gain a little distance (on average) or at least stay the same with gained accuracy.

I would sacrifice 10-15 yards or whatever to be in the fairway more often anyway. As long as it's further than my 3 wood I'm happy.

Posted
I can understand the "need" for a short guy to choke down some. But A.K. @ 5'10" isn't short, and @ 6'3" neither am I. My gains in both accuracy, and distance can only be explained by a little more club control. When I hit my 3W, and don't fat it (only happens occasionally) I am usually right on target either nice and straight or with a slight 5-yard fade.

Choking down on the driver helps me make contact closer to the sweet spot. Easing up on the swing certainly adds control. Both of which have apparently given me added distance.

I loaned a driver to a guy almost two years ago that I just got back. The sole of the club was horribly dented, so I yanked the shaft from it (Aldilla VS Proto-DR 65-S), and another driver that I hated (UST Competition 65). When I pulled the Aldilla I damaged the tip, so I had to cut off about an inch. Don't know what that's going to do to the performance of the shaft, but I'm looking forward to giving the club a try. The new combo is the above mentioned Aldilla in a Maltby KE4 Beta 9* head. Hopefully it turns out to be a fortunate accident.

In the bag
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
Fairway: Launcher 2009 17*
Irons: X-18r 4-SW
Gap Wedge: CG15 52*Wedge: X Tour 60*Putter: Crimson 550Ball: E5


Posted
+1 here too. I think I read a thread or two here, and decided to try it. It's been working pretty good. I am hitting quite similar to STACK04 above.
I think I have lost a little distance but it beats looking in the woods for your ball. I am hitting an FT-IQ 9* with 1* closed face with a Reg flex shaft.

Driver: X460 tour- 9.5*
3-wood: 3+ - 13*
Hybrid: BB HW 20*
Hybrid: 24*
Irons: X-20 Uniflex SteelWedges: Colonial 56* & 60*Putter: XG SabertoothBall: GPS-8âIf you are caught on a golf course during a storm and are afraid of lightning, hold up a 1-iron. Not even God...


Posted
An interesting note is that I've read in many places that tour players typically play driver shafts 44-45" (there's exceptions of course). Tiger was experimenting with a 43.5 shaft at one time I believe. Meanwhile, you've got certain club manufacturers, like Taylor Made, that have their stock shafts 45.5 and even 46" in some models. Crazy. That 1-2" makes a huge difference.

Posted
I've been choking down on all my clubs for around 3 months. the driver, especially, gets the best results from this

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
He's 5'10" (177cm). Not very tall, but not very low either.

Kim is doing that because as a youngster he had too long clubs and he grew up taking the grip a bit lower and has not been able to give this up. It has nothing to do with gaining accuracy.

However, I am really astonished that a guy with HCI 22.5 or something drives 300+ with a choked driver. I use choking to gain lower trajectory and accuracy and manage to reach distances almost the same than a normal drive (250-260 yds) but only when the fairway is dry and hard. The trajectory is very much lower (understandable, as there is much less kick from the shaft) so carry must be maybe 50 to 60 % of that of a normal drive.

Posted
An interesting note is that I've read in many places that tour players typically play driver shafts 44-45" (there's exceptions of course). Tiger was experimenting with a 43.5 shaft at one time I believe. Meanwhile, you've got certain club manufacturers, like Taylor Made, that have their stock shafts 45.5 and even 46" in some models. Crazy. That 1-2" makes a huge difference.

I think I know the reasoning behind this approach. Most "average" Golfers generally don't make solid contact in the sweet-spot, and therefore are not achieving optimum distance for their particular swing-speed.

So, the bright-sparks at TaylorMade must have realised that adding a few extra inches to the shaft length will compensate for the above mentioned flaw.

  • Moderator
Posted
Kim is doing that because as a youngster he had too long clubs and he grew up taking the grip a bit lower and has not been able to give this up. It has nothing to do with gaining accuracy.

I remember him saying that Nike made him a shorter driver so he wouldn't have to choke up, but every time he hit it, he would choke up automatically. It is just what he feels comfortable doing. If I could hit the ball as far as he does, I wouldn't change it either.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5597 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.