Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jathames

Taylormade XFT Wedge

15 posts in this topic

Guys

I have been playing the old original Rac Chrome. I have used the vokeys and Clevelands in the past and have liked both, but really like the Taylormade RAC better. My grooves are wore out and looking for a new wedge. Any reviews or comments on the XFT wedge would be appreciated. I know Taylormade is coming with a new wedge in the spring, anyone got any insight on that.. should I wait......
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

i like my xFT's
similar shape to a Vokey, heavier than a Vokey, soft feel for a cast wedge and being able to change out the face for fresh or conforming grooves is awesome

i think TM hit something good with these wedges for sure
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^ Agreed! I love how you can swap out for some fresh grooves and they are pretty cheap for a new set of grooves as well. I love the feel of them as well. Tho I am a bit of a TM ••••• haha.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anybody know if they are going to be able to make the Z groove inserts after the end of the year? I'm thinking of making the switch and I'm not sure if I need to "stock up" on the inserts as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are great wedges, most wedges are cheep made now and are not forged so don;t worry about then being cast. The face insert thing is abit of a have, but not a had idea. If you only play like once a week you should not need new grooves for like 2 years +
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much of a TM guy but I really like the XFTs. Nice feel, useful grind and damn good looking too. As far as the inserts go, I'm pretty sure they've already churned out enough of those that you'll be able to pick them up on ebay for many years to come. If you're worried, just stock up on half a dozen now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Local golf shop is having a Christmas sale on these. $50 off and one free replacement face. I cracked and bought a 56/12 as my Mizzy SW is beat to hell.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow, that's a great deal! TGW.com is having a 15% off sale which takes these to $76.50 and free shipping. I think I'm going to bite. I gotta get two so I have a replacement for both my 52 and 58. At least the face plates are the same on all models.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are great wedges, most wedges are cheep made now and are not forged so don;t worry about then being cast. The face insert thing is abit of a have, but not a had idea. If you only play like once a week you should not need new grooves for like 2 years +

But don't they feel 10000000x worse than a forged wedge?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I spent about two hours around the practice green with the XFT this evening. Really like the feel and everything works well for me except longer pitches from frog hair lies. The sole seems quite grabby/stubby in its turf interaction compared to the sharp leading edge I'm used to with the Mizunos. If I went to a full set, I would probably get the 60/06 for this particular duty.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Very happy with these wedges. Picked up a full set and, with the free replacement faces, should be good for a while.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hit them for a while up against a Mizuno and CG15 at the PGA Tour Superstore. I didn't like the feel at all. My plan for sharp U grooves for years to come has been foiled. Very disappointed.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the Mizunos before and actually prefer the feel of the XFTs around the green. On fuller swings, the XFTs do feel heavier and more inert -- probably because the exchangeable face stuff at the back sets up like a big muscle pad. Won't suit everyone but doesn't bother me.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I tried a 50° after losing my gap wedge.  Loved it.  Just replaced my 56.12 RAC TP Satin with a 54.12 xft.  Going to replace my 60° TP Satin with an xft next.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just switched to XFT wedges 50, 54, & 58; I love em. They feel heavier than the average wedge, which I like because the club head gets through the grass and dirt really well with less effort. But, I was told by a friend that I couldn't use my wedges in an upcoming tournament because the grooves are not post 2010 (v grooves); I'm using the XFT- "Z" grooves. Thank you Taylormade for saving me money; I can replace the face with a new regulation face insert instead of buying new wedges. I hope Taylormade brings the XFT back in some shape or form; it was a true innovation to a club that has not seen much innovation throughout the years.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • These are myths that I hear a lot. Some are just eye rolling trivia but some can hurt. 1. Tour pros continuously vary their shot shape based on hole demand. Not true. They have one predominant shot shape they play almost all the time. Only when in jail or extreme condition do they actually try anything out of their comfort zone - which is smaller than most folks think. 2. Tour pros are like swing doctors. They know everything there is to know about the golf swing. Nope - they are simply phenomenal listeners and executors. 3. You must understand the swing in it's entirety to learn and become better - Yeah, good luck on that path.   4. To have lag just hold the angle of the shaft to forearm until impact. - Lag is a result of good mechanics and club position and path. Can't force it. 5. You must have a superlight grip pressure (2-3 on a scale of 1 to 10) to hit good shots. - While white knuckling is just bad, you do need more grip pressure than you think.
    •   The problem is the twitter length version, get it as close to the hole as possible, is easy to read as, hit the longest club.  Really the argument in LSW (backed by stats), is around a multi-faceted risk assessment.  Simplifying less than the twitter version, hit it as far as possible without bringing "too much" risk into play.  The long version is basically a law of total probability argument, where you assess the probability of various outcomes with each current shot choice, and weight them by the average shots to hole out given each outcome, and choose the lowest. For example, you're sitting at 250 on a par 5.  You go through the potential outcomes of an 8i and 3i and estimate average shots to hole out from each: on target, slightly off target, chunk, blade, in jail, in hazard, open look but super penal rough, OB, whatever.  Then you think about the chances of these outcomes, and calculate the total expected score from each choice. The point in LSW is that you can't go through a bunch of equations for every shot, but if you're accurate about your average shot dispersions across clubs, then the typical bogey or better golfer is often overestimating the increase in risk from going for the longer shot, and underestimating the decrease in expected number of shots to hole out from getting it closer. The rule of thumb is that if there's not something in the layout that is a big risk at the longer distance but not at the short one – so in your case lateral hazard or big fairway thinning or big fairway bunker or much or penal rough or the like that starts at 75 yards out – then generally your lower expected total score is from hitting the longer club.  The strokes you lose when you do hit an errant long iron but wouldn't have hit an errant short iron are more than made up for by the strokes you gain from having an approach half as long when you don't hit an errant shot. Of course, it's always case by case and player by player.
    • I've been working on changing that for two years!
    • If this is true, then club fitting would be purely entertainment also and make no difference.  We could all use different clubs every time we played with no measurable effect on our score.  I'm not so sure all the time, money and effort that has gone towards studying the benefits of club fitting and developing custom club programs and fitting carts and training techs how to conduct a club fitting session would have been spent if it's all just "entertainment". Now, will there be a huge difference between the e6 and e7 for the average player?  No.  They are both 3 piece distance balls with the same type of cover, so the differences are not huge.  Noticeable, but not huge.  The difference between an e6 and a Pro V1 though will be dramatic.  And the number of players that played the Pro V that have been recommended the e6 are in the tens of thousands.  Not only is there a difference in the performance of those balls, but when you factor in the tendencies of the player the results can be substantial.  If a 10-15 yard gain won't have any affect on the average player's score, then you wouldn't mind if you had to give up 10-15 yards of distance off your drives and 5-7 off your irons, correct?  How would it affect your score if you had to tee off 25 yds  further back on every hole?  I'm guessing it would cost at least a couple of shots. Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon